膀胱内注射吉西他滨和多西他赛vs.再诱导卡介苗Guerin作为非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的一线挽救治疗

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70012
Kylie Yen-Yi Lim, Tran Ngoc An Huynh, Gavin Wei, Jincy Kuriakose, Obaidullah Fazli, David Pook, Sarah Ransley, Janice Downie, Scott Donnellan, Weranja Ranasinghe
{"title":"膀胱内注射吉西他滨和多西他赛vs.再诱导卡介苗Guerin作为非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的一线挽救治疗","authors":"Kylie Yen-Yi Lim,&nbsp;Tran Ngoc An Huynh,&nbsp;Gavin Wei,&nbsp;Jincy Kuriakose,&nbsp;Obaidullah Fazli,&nbsp;David Pook,&nbsp;Sarah Ransley,&nbsp;Janice Downie,&nbsp;Scott Donnellan,&nbsp;Weranja Ranasinghe","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To compare the outcomes between re-induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and sequential intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel (Gem/Doce) therapy in patients with high-grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) following failure of initial induction BCG.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively identified patients who received induction BCG therapy between 2017 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were high-grade NMIBC recurrence post-BCG induction, with subsequent treatment by either re-induction BCG or Gem/Doce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>From 2017 to 2023, 140 patients received induction BCG, with 30 (21.4%) showing persistent HG NMIBC. Of these, five (16.7%) were treated with re-induction BCG and 11 (36.7%) with Gem/Doce. In the re-induction BCG group, four patients (80%) had HGTa and one (20%) had HGT1. In the Gem/Doce group, eight patients (73%) had HGTa, two (18%) had HGT1 and one (9%) had carcinoma in situ (CIS). Initial post-treatment cystoscopy showed recurrence in one re-induction BCG patient (20%) with HGT1 and CIS and in two Gem/Doce patients (18%) with HGTa. No adverse events were reported with Gem/Doce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our initial experience with intravesical Gem/Doce suggests that it is better tolerated, with fewer adverse events and comparable recurrence rates at three months, compared to re-induction BCG in patients with BCG-failure NMIBC.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel vs. re-induction Bacillus Calmette Guerin as first-line salvage therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Yen-Yi Lim,&nbsp;Tran Ngoc An Huynh,&nbsp;Gavin Wei,&nbsp;Jincy Kuriakose,&nbsp;Obaidullah Fazli,&nbsp;David Pook,&nbsp;Sarah Ransley,&nbsp;Janice Downie,&nbsp;Scott Donnellan,&nbsp;Weranja Ranasinghe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To compare the outcomes between re-induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and sequential intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel (Gem/Doce) therapy in patients with high-grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) following failure of initial induction BCG.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively identified patients who received induction BCG therapy between 2017 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were high-grade NMIBC recurrence post-BCG induction, with subsequent treatment by either re-induction BCG or Gem/Doce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>From 2017 to 2023, 140 patients received induction BCG, with 30 (21.4%) showing persistent HG NMIBC. Of these, five (16.7%) were treated with re-induction BCG and 11 (36.7%) with Gem/Doce. In the re-induction BCG group, four patients (80%) had HGTa and one (20%) had HGT1. In the Gem/Doce group, eight patients (73%) had HGTa, two (18%) had HGT1 and one (9%) had carcinoma in situ (CIS). Initial post-treatment cystoscopy showed recurrence in one re-induction BCG patient (20%) with HGT1 and CIS and in two Gem/Doce patients (18%) with HGTa. No adverse events were reported with Gem/Doce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our initial experience with intravesical Gem/Doce suggests that it is better tolerated, with fewer adverse events and comparable recurrence rates at three months, compared to re-induction BCG in patients with BCG-failure NMIBC.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较再诱导卡介苗(BCG)和序贯膀胱内注射吉西他滨-多西他赛(Gem/Doce)治疗原发性非肌性膀胱癌(NMIBC)失败后的疗效。材料和方法回顾性分析2017年至2023年间接受卡介苗诱导治疗的患者。纳入标准为卡介苗诱导后高度NMIBC复发,随后再诱导卡介苗或Gem/Doce治疗。结果2017 - 2023年,140例患者接受了诱导卡介苗治疗,其中30例(21.4%)出现持续性HG NMIBC。其中,再诱导BCG治疗5例(16.7%),Gem/Doce治疗11例(36.7%)。在再诱导BCG组,4例(80%)患者有HGTa, 1例(20%)患者有HGT1。在Gem/Doce组中,8名患者(73%)患有HGTa, 2名患者(18%)患有HGT1, 1名患者(9%)患有原位癌(CIS)。最初的治疗后膀胱镜检查显示,1例合并HGT1和CIS的再诱导BCG患者(20%)和2例合并HGTa的Gem/Doce患者(18%)复发。Gem/Doce无不良事件报告。我们的初步经验表明,与BCG功能衰竭的NMIBC患者相比,膀胱内注射Gem/Doce具有更好的耐受性,不良事件较少,3个月复发率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel vs. re-induction Bacillus Calmette Guerin as first-line salvage therapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Objectives

To compare the outcomes between re-induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and sequential intravesical gemcitabine-docetaxel (Gem/Doce) therapy in patients with high-grade (HG) non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) following failure of initial induction BCG.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified patients who received induction BCG therapy between 2017 and 2023. Inclusion criteria were high-grade NMIBC recurrence post-BCG induction, with subsequent treatment by either re-induction BCG or Gem/Doce.

Results

From 2017 to 2023, 140 patients received induction BCG, with 30 (21.4%) showing persistent HG NMIBC. Of these, five (16.7%) were treated with re-induction BCG and 11 (36.7%) with Gem/Doce. In the re-induction BCG group, four patients (80%) had HGTa and one (20%) had HGT1. In the Gem/Doce group, eight patients (73%) had HGTa, two (18%) had HGT1 and one (9%) had carcinoma in situ (CIS). Initial post-treatment cystoscopy showed recurrence in one re-induction BCG patient (20%) with HGT1 and CIS and in two Gem/Doce patients (18%) with HGTa. No adverse events were reported with Gem/Doce.

Conclusion

Our initial experience with intravesical Gem/Doce suggests that it is better tolerated, with fewer adverse events and comparable recurrence rates at three months, compared to re-induction BCG in patients with BCG-failure NMIBC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信