如果火神是一个行星质量的原始黑洞?

IF 1.1 4区 物理与天体物理 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Souren P. Pogossian
{"title":"如果火神是一个行星质量的原始黑洞?","authors":"Souren P. Pogossian","doi":"10.1007/s12036-025-10046-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, I re-examine the question of whether a hypothetical planet, Vulcan, could explain the anomalous advance of Mercury’s perihelion. I propose that Vulcan might be considered a type of primordial black hole with a planetary mass. The detection of this type of celestial body has become possible through modern experimental techniques, including the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Recently, an excess of ultra-short microlensing events with crossing times of 0.1–0.3 days has been reported, suggesting the possible existence of sub-Earth-mass primordial black holes in our solar system. The primordial black hole Vulcan planetary mass hypothesis could then explain the anomalous advance of Mercury’s perihelion under the influence of its gravitational attraction, remaining hidden from astronomers’ telescopes. But in this case, it will also influence the perihelion advance of the other planets. To this end, I first calculate the mutual partial contributions to the perihelion motion of all the planets by two different methods without Vulcan in a model of the simplified solar system consisting of the Sun and eight planets. Next, I include Vulcan in this model within the framework of the Newtonian theory of classical gravitation and analyze Vulcan’s influence on the perihelion advance of the inner planets, using Vulcan parameters from my previous work. These results are compared with the perihelion advances of the inner planets predicted by the theory of general relativity and with the data obtained by modern observations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If Vulcan was a primordial black hole of planetary-mass?\",\"authors\":\"Souren P. Pogossian\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12036-025-10046-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, I re-examine the question of whether a hypothetical planet, Vulcan, could explain the anomalous advance of Mercury’s perihelion. I propose that Vulcan might be considered a type of primordial black hole with a planetary mass. The detection of this type of celestial body has become possible through modern experimental techniques, including the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Recently, an excess of ultra-short microlensing events with crossing times of 0.1–0.3 days has been reported, suggesting the possible existence of sub-Earth-mass primordial black holes in our solar system. The primordial black hole Vulcan planetary mass hypothesis could then explain the anomalous advance of Mercury’s perihelion under the influence of its gravitational attraction, remaining hidden from astronomers’ telescopes. But in this case, it will also influence the perihelion advance of the other planets. To this end, I first calculate the mutual partial contributions to the perihelion motion of all the planets by two different methods without Vulcan in a model of the simplified solar system consisting of the Sun and eight planets. Next, I include Vulcan in this model within the framework of the Newtonian theory of classical gravitation and analyze Vulcan’s influence on the perihelion advance of the inner planets, using Vulcan parameters from my previous work. These results are compared with the perihelion advances of the inner planets predicted by the theory of general relativity and with the data obtained by modern observations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12036-025-10046-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12036-025-10046-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我重新审视了一个假设的行星,火神,是否可以解释水星近日点的异常推进的问题。我认为火神星可能被认为是一种具有行星质量的原始黑洞。通过现代实验技术,包括光学引力透镜实验,探测这类天体已经成为可能。最近,超短微透镜事件的交叉时间超过0.1-0.3天,这表明我们的太阳系中可能存在低于地球质量的原始黑洞。原始黑洞火神行星质量假说可以解释水星近日点在引力作用下的异常推进,这是天文学家望远镜无法观测到的。但在这种情况下,它也会影响其他行星的近日点前进。为此,我首先在一个由太阳和八颗行星组成的简化的太阳系模型中,不考虑火神星,用两种不同的方法计算了所有行星对近日点运动的相互部分贡献。接下来,我在牛顿经典万有引力理论的框架内将火神星纳入这个模型,并使用我之前工作中的火神星参数分析火神星对内行星近日点推进的影响。这些结果与广义相对论所预测的内行星的近日点推进和现代观测所得的数据进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
If Vulcan was a primordial black hole of planetary-mass?

In this study, I re-examine the question of whether a hypothetical planet, Vulcan, could explain the anomalous advance of Mercury’s perihelion. I propose that Vulcan might be considered a type of primordial black hole with a planetary mass. The detection of this type of celestial body has become possible through modern experimental techniques, including the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment. Recently, an excess of ultra-short microlensing events with crossing times of 0.1–0.3 days has been reported, suggesting the possible existence of sub-Earth-mass primordial black holes in our solar system. The primordial black hole Vulcan planetary mass hypothesis could then explain the anomalous advance of Mercury’s perihelion under the influence of its gravitational attraction, remaining hidden from astronomers’ telescopes. But in this case, it will also influence the perihelion advance of the other planets. To this end, I first calculate the mutual partial contributions to the perihelion motion of all the planets by two different methods without Vulcan in a model of the simplified solar system consisting of the Sun and eight planets. Next, I include Vulcan in this model within the framework of the Newtonian theory of classical gravitation and analyze Vulcan’s influence on the perihelion advance of the inner planets, using Vulcan parameters from my previous work. These results are compared with the perihelion advances of the inner planets predicted by the theory of general relativity and with the data obtained by modern observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers on all aspects of astrophysics and astronomy, including instrumentation, laboratory astrophysics, and cosmology. Critical reviews of topical fields are also published. Articles submitted as letters will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信