IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Xingxuan Zhuo , Liuqing Lin , Jiefan Lian
{"title":"Spatiotemporal analysis of the dynamic evolution and driving factors of trade networks in the Belt and Road countries","authors":"Xingxuan Zhuo ,&nbsp;Liuqing Lin ,&nbsp;Jiefan Lian","doi":"10.1016/j.socnet.2025.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) continues to advance, trade networks among BRI countries have evolved significantly. Understanding development patterns within these trade networks is crucial for promoting further growth. This study adopts a spatiotemporal perspective to analyze the dynamic evolution and driving factors of trade networks among BRI countries, utilizing the Separable Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (STERGM) and a change point detection model. These methods assess the impact of endogenous structural variables, exogenous edge-level covariates, and exogenous nodal variables on the formation and dissolution of trade networks, as well as on stage-specific changes within these networks. The findings reveal that: (1) around 2017, the trade networks underwent a significant shift, with high-trade-value relationships growing faster than low-trade-value ones, and the networks have a small-world character. (2) China, Turkey, India, and Russia hold central positions in the trade networks, functioning as “bridges” and “hubs”; the prominence of Poland, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine has increased, while Thailand and United Arab Emirates have seen a relative decline; (3) geographical proximity, bilateral investment treaties, and shared legal origins foster trade network development, whereas exchange rate volatility and political distance have a negative impact. Countries with high urbanization, large populations, and strong economies are more likely to form trade relations. And these effects on the formation and maintenance of trade relations changed significantly before and after 2017. Therefore, while enhancing their own economic and social development, BRI countries should work to strengthen trade relations by bridging political differences and establishing trade agreements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48353,"journal":{"name":"Social Networks","volume":"82 ","pages":"Pages 80-98"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Networks","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873325000140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着 "一带一路 "倡议(BRI)的不断推进,"一带一路 "国家之间的贸易网络也发生了显著变化。了解这些贸易网络的发展模式对于促进进一步发展至关重要。本研究采用时空视角,利用可分离时空指数随机图模型(STERGM)和变化点检测模型,分析金砖国家间贸易网络的动态演化和驱动因素。这些方法评估了内生结构变量、外生边缘级协变量和外生节点变量对贸易网络形成和解体的影响,以及对这些网络内部特定阶段变化的影响。研究结果表明(1)2017 年前后,贸易网络发生了显著变化,高贸易价值关系的增长速度快于低贸易价值关系的增长速度,网络具有小世界特征。(2)中国、土耳其、印度和俄罗斯在贸易网络中占据核心地位,发挥着 "桥梁 "和 "枢纽 "的作用;波兰、捷克和乌克兰的地位有所上升,而泰国和阿联酋的地位相对下降;(3)地理位置接近、双边投资条约和共同的法律渊源促进了贸易网络的发展,而汇率波动和政治距离则产生了负面影响。城市化程度高、人口众多、经济实力雄厚的国家更有可能形成贸易关系。而这些对贸易关系形成和维持的影响在2017年前后发生了显著变化。因此,金砖国家在加强自身经济和社会发展的同时,应努力通过弥合政治分歧和建立贸易协定来加强贸易关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatiotemporal analysis of the dynamic evolution and driving factors of trade networks in the Belt and Road countries
As the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) continues to advance, trade networks among BRI countries have evolved significantly. Understanding development patterns within these trade networks is crucial for promoting further growth. This study adopts a spatiotemporal perspective to analyze the dynamic evolution and driving factors of trade networks among BRI countries, utilizing the Separable Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (STERGM) and a change point detection model. These methods assess the impact of endogenous structural variables, exogenous edge-level covariates, and exogenous nodal variables on the formation and dissolution of trade networks, as well as on stage-specific changes within these networks. The findings reveal that: (1) around 2017, the trade networks underwent a significant shift, with high-trade-value relationships growing faster than low-trade-value ones, and the networks have a small-world character. (2) China, Turkey, India, and Russia hold central positions in the trade networks, functioning as “bridges” and “hubs”; the prominence of Poland, the Czech Republic, and Ukraine has increased, while Thailand and United Arab Emirates have seen a relative decline; (3) geographical proximity, bilateral investment treaties, and shared legal origins foster trade network development, whereas exchange rate volatility and political distance have a negative impact. Countries with high urbanization, large populations, and strong economies are more likely to form trade relations. And these effects on the formation and maintenance of trade relations changed significantly before and after 2017. Therefore, while enhancing their own economic and social development, BRI countries should work to strengthen trade relations by bridging political differences and establishing trade agreements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Networks
Social Networks Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
12.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: Social Networks is an interdisciplinary and international quarterly. It provides a common forum for representatives of anthropology, sociology, history, social psychology, political science, human geography, biology, economics, communications science and other disciplines who share an interest in the study of the empirical structure of social relations and associations that may be expressed in network form. It publishes both theoretical and substantive papers. Critical reviews of major theoretical or methodological approaches using the notion of networks in the analysis of social behaviour are also included, as are reviews of recent books dealing with social networks and social structure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信