脊柱麻醉下剖宫产血压管理:英国多中心审计(2023)

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
J Blackburn , EJ Yates , MS Jarvis , CL Small , J Kerr , J Patel , J Yeung , on behalf of West Midlands Trainee Research in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Network (WMTRAIN) Collaborators
{"title":"脊柱麻醉下剖宫产血压管理:英国多中心审计(2023)","authors":"J Blackburn ,&nbsp;EJ Yates ,&nbsp;MS Jarvis ,&nbsp;CL Small ,&nbsp;J Kerr ,&nbsp;J Patel ,&nbsp;J Yeung ,&nbsp;on behalf of West Midlands Trainee Research in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Network (WMTRAIN) Collaborators","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Untreated sympathetic blockade after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery can cause profound maternal hypotension. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends systolic blood pressure (SBP) should be maintained ≥90% of the baseline. This multi-centre audit assessed compliance with guidance regarding choice and administration method of vasopressors during caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multi-centre prospective audit of adult patients undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia was undertaken across the West Midlands, UK. Anonymised patient data was obtained during routine peri-operative care and audited across primary, process and clinical outcomes. The primary audit outcome was maintenance of intra-operative SBP at ≥90% baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five-hundred-and-twenty-six patients were included. The primary outcome was achieved in 9.1% of cases. SBP was maintained within 80–90% of baseline in 65.0%, and below 80% of baseline in 25.9%. Phenylephrine was the first-line vasopressor in 91% of cases, administered via a rate-controlled device in 73.8%. Compliance with the international consensus recommendation for prophylactic phenylephrine via a rate-controlled device at 25–50 μg/min was 37.6%. Clinician-reported incidence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting were 24.9% and 8.4% respectively. Secondary analysis found that use of rate-controlled pump devices to administer prophylactic vasopressors was associated with reduced incidence of SBP decrease to &lt;80% of baseline (<em>P</em> &lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intraoperative hypotension is common, and there is lack of adherence to guidance, including variation in choice and administration method of prophylactic vasopressors. Optimal management of hypotension should be incorporated into departmental guidance for enhanced recovery.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 104352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood pressure management for caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: a UK multi-centre audit (2023)\",\"authors\":\"J Blackburn ,&nbsp;EJ Yates ,&nbsp;MS Jarvis ,&nbsp;CL Small ,&nbsp;J Kerr ,&nbsp;J Patel ,&nbsp;J Yeung ,&nbsp;on behalf of West Midlands Trainee Research in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Network (WMTRAIN) Collaborators\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Untreated sympathetic blockade after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery can cause profound maternal hypotension. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends systolic blood pressure (SBP) should be maintained ≥90% of the baseline. This multi-centre audit assessed compliance with guidance regarding choice and administration method of vasopressors during caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multi-centre prospective audit of adult patients undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia was undertaken across the West Midlands, UK. Anonymised patient data was obtained during routine peri-operative care and audited across primary, process and clinical outcomes. The primary audit outcome was maintenance of intra-operative SBP at ≥90% baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five-hundred-and-twenty-six patients were included. The primary outcome was achieved in 9.1% of cases. SBP was maintained within 80–90% of baseline in 65.0%, and below 80% of baseline in 25.9%. Phenylephrine was the first-line vasopressor in 91% of cases, administered via a rate-controlled device in 73.8%. Compliance with the international consensus recommendation for prophylactic phenylephrine via a rate-controlled device at 25–50 μg/min was 37.6%. Clinician-reported incidence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting were 24.9% and 8.4% respectively. Secondary analysis found that use of rate-controlled pump devices to administer prophylactic vasopressors was associated with reduced incidence of SBP decrease to &lt;80% of baseline (<em>P</em> &lt;0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Intraoperative hypotension is common, and there is lack of adherence to guidance, including variation in choice and administration method of prophylactic vasopressors. Optimal management of hypotension should be incorporated into departmental guidance for enhanced recovery.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of obstetric anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X2500024X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X2500024X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剖宫产脊髓麻醉后交感神经阻滞治疗可引起重度低血压。国家健康与护理卓越研究所(NICE)指南建议收缩压(SBP)应维持≥基线的90%。这项多中心审核评估了脊柱麻醉下剖宫产时血管加压药的选择和给药方法的依从性。方法对英国西米德兰兹郡脊髓麻醉下剖宫产的成年患者进行多中心前瞻性审计。在常规围手术期护理期间获得匿名患者数据,并对主要、过程和临床结果进行审计。主要审计结果是术中收缩压维持在≥90%基线。结果共纳入526例患者。9.1%的病例达到了主要结局。65.0%的患者收缩压维持在基线的80-90%,25.9%的患者收缩压低于基线的80%。在91%的病例中,苯肾上腺素是一线血管加压药,73.8%的病例通过速率控制装置给药。通过速率控制装置以25-50 μg/min使用预防性苯肾上腺素,符合国际共识建议的比例为37.6%。临床报告的术中恶心和呕吐发生率分别为24.9%和8.4%。二次分析发现,使用速率控制泵装置给予预防性血管加压药物与收缩压发生率降低至基线的80%相关(P <0.01)。结论术中低血压较为常见,但缺乏对指导的坚持,包括预防性血管加压药物的选择和给药方法存在差异。低血压的最佳管理应纳入部门指导,以促进恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blood pressure management for caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia: a UK multi-centre audit (2023)

Background

Untreated sympathetic blockade after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery can cause profound maternal hypotension. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance recommends systolic blood pressure (SBP) should be maintained ≥90% of the baseline. This multi-centre audit assessed compliance with guidance regarding choice and administration method of vasopressors during caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia.

Methods

A multi-centre prospective audit of adult patients undergoing caesarean delivery under spinal anaesthesia was undertaken across the West Midlands, UK. Anonymised patient data was obtained during routine peri-operative care and audited across primary, process and clinical outcomes. The primary audit outcome was maintenance of intra-operative SBP at ≥90% baseline.

Results

Five-hundred-and-twenty-six patients were included. The primary outcome was achieved in 9.1% of cases. SBP was maintained within 80–90% of baseline in 65.0%, and below 80% of baseline in 25.9%. Phenylephrine was the first-line vasopressor in 91% of cases, administered via a rate-controlled device in 73.8%. Compliance with the international consensus recommendation for prophylactic phenylephrine via a rate-controlled device at 25–50 μg/min was 37.6%. Clinician-reported incidence of intra-operative nausea and vomiting were 24.9% and 8.4% respectively. Secondary analysis found that use of rate-controlled pump devices to administer prophylactic vasopressors was associated with reduced incidence of SBP decrease to <80% of baseline (P <0.01).

Conclusions

Intraoperative hypotension is common, and there is lack of adherence to guidance, including variation in choice and administration method of prophylactic vasopressors. Optimal management of hypotension should be incorporated into departmental guidance for enhanced recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信