难民创伤后压力:感知社会支持的调节作用

IF 3.9 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria Sophie Boettcher, Frank Neuner
{"title":"难民创伤后压力:感知社会支持的调节作用","authors":"Victoria Sophie Boettcher,&nbsp;Frank Neuner","doi":"10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Social support has been associated with the mental health of refugees. However, little is known about the characteristics and effects of social support in this group. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective role of social support, specifically through the perceived opportunity to confide in someone. We hypothesized that the opportunity to confide would have a moderating influence on the dose-effect relationship between trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical face-to-face interviews were conducted with 65 adult refugees who were living in the north-east of North Rhine-Westphalia. Interpreters (Arabic, Farsi, Kurmancî) were present if necessary. Interviews included a detailed assessment of traumatic event types, PTSD symptoms (assessed via the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)), and social support experienced by the participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multiple hierarchical regression analysis revealed a significant moderation of the perceived opportunity to confide on the association of number of traumatic event types reported and PTSD symptomatology. For refugees with limited trauma exposure, opportunity to confide was associated with lower PTSD symptoms. Most confidants were located within the countries of reception, while contacts in the home countries were less often identified as protective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Social support, in particular the opportunity to confide, seems to act as a buffering factor up to a certain number of experienced traumatic event types. Specialized interventions may be necessary for people with a high trauma load and / or high symptom level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34448,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Migration and Health","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100323"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttraumatic stress among refugees: The moderating effect of perceived social support\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Sophie Boettcher,&nbsp;Frank Neuner\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmh.2025.100323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Social support has been associated with the mental health of refugees. However, little is known about the characteristics and effects of social support in this group. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective role of social support, specifically through the perceived opportunity to confide in someone. We hypothesized that the opportunity to confide would have a moderating influence on the dose-effect relationship between trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Clinical face-to-face interviews were conducted with 65 adult refugees who were living in the north-east of North Rhine-Westphalia. Interpreters (Arabic, Farsi, Kurmancî) were present if necessary. Interviews included a detailed assessment of traumatic event types, PTSD symptoms (assessed via the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)), and social support experienced by the participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The multiple hierarchical regression analysis revealed a significant moderation of the perceived opportunity to confide on the association of number of traumatic event types reported and PTSD symptomatology. For refugees with limited trauma exposure, opportunity to confide was associated with lower PTSD symptoms. Most confidants were located within the countries of reception, while contacts in the home countries were less often identified as protective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Social support, in particular the opportunity to confide, seems to act as a buffering factor up to a certain number of experienced traumatic event types. Specialized interventions may be necessary for people with a high trauma load and / or high symptom level.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Migration and Health\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Migration and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623525000224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Migration and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666623525000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的社会支持与难民的心理健康密切相关。然而,人们对这一群体中社会支持的特征和影响知之甚少。这项研究的目的是调查社会支持的保护作用,特别是通过感知到的向某人倾诉的机会。我们假设,在创伤暴露和创伤后应激障碍症状之间的剂量效应关系中,吐露心事的机会会起到调节作用。方法对居住在北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州东北部的65名成年难民进行临床面对面访谈。口译员(阿拉伯语、波斯语、Kurmancî)在必要时在场。访谈包括对创伤事件类型、创伤后应激障碍症状(通过DSM-5 (PCL-5)的创伤后应激障碍检查表进行评估)和参与者所经历的社会支持的详细评估。结果多层次回归分析显示,创伤性事件类型数量与创伤后应激障碍症状之间的关系对感知机会有显著的调节作用。对于创伤暴露有限的难民来说,倾诉的机会与较低的创伤后应激障碍症状有关。大多数知己都在接待国境内,而在母国的接触较少被认定为保护。社会支持,特别是倾诉的机会,似乎在一定数量的创伤性事件类型中起着缓冲作用。对于高创伤负荷和/或高症状水平的人,可能需要专门的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Posttraumatic stress among refugees: The moderating effect of perceived social support

Objective

Social support has been associated with the mental health of refugees. However, little is known about the characteristics and effects of social support in this group. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective role of social support, specifically through the perceived opportunity to confide in someone. We hypothesized that the opportunity to confide would have a moderating influence on the dose-effect relationship between trauma exposure and PTSD symptoms.

Methods

Clinical face-to-face interviews were conducted with 65 adult refugees who were living in the north-east of North Rhine-Westphalia. Interpreters (Arabic, Farsi, Kurmancî) were present if necessary. Interviews included a detailed assessment of traumatic event types, PTSD symptoms (assessed via the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)), and social support experienced by the participants.

Results

The multiple hierarchical regression analysis revealed a significant moderation of the perceived opportunity to confide on the association of number of traumatic event types reported and PTSD symptomatology. For refugees with limited trauma exposure, opportunity to confide was associated with lower PTSD symptoms. Most confidants were located within the countries of reception, while contacts in the home countries were less often identified as protective.

Conclusions

Social support, in particular the opportunity to confide, seems to act as a buffering factor up to a certain number of experienced traumatic event types. Specialized interventions may be necessary for people with a high trauma load and / or high symptom level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Migration and Health
Journal of Migration and Health Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
65
审稿时长
153 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信