范围不确定度对强度调制混合电子-光子放射治疗的影响。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/mp.17771
Veng Jean Heng, Marc-André Renaud, Monica Serban, Jan Seuntjens
{"title":"范围不确定度对强度调制混合电子-光子放射治疗的影响。","authors":"Veng Jean Heng,&nbsp;Marc-André Renaud,&nbsp;Monica Serban,&nbsp;Jan Seuntjens","doi":"10.1002/mp.17771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In the context of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy (MBRT), while the necessity of robust optimization to setup uncertainties is well-established, range uncertainties have yet to be investigated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study provides the first assessment of the impact of range uncertainties on MBRT plans.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The percent depth dose of 2 electron beams (6 MeV and 20 MeV) and 1 photon beam (6 MV) are calculated by Monte Carlo using EGSnrc in slab phantoms. Range uncertainties are simulated by generating two copies of the phantom with each voxel's mass density upscaled or downscaled by 3.5%. Two clinical plans for a leg sarcoma case and a post-mastectomy breast case were replanned with MBRT with 2 optimization methods: once without robust optimization and once with robust to both setup and range uncertainties.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Dose discrepancies between the percent depth doses of density-scaled phantoms and the nominal phantom were found to be much larger for electron beams than photons with maximum differences of 6.9% (6 MeV) and 5.5% (20 MeV) versus 1.6% (6 MV) of the maximum dose. In both clinical cases, the region of largest dose discrepancy between the range and nominal scenarios was found to be along the electron's beam path, starting immediately downstream from the target and within a few cm. Even without robust optimization, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of all relevant structures were not meaningfully degraded under range scenarios. In the breast plan, the ipsilateral lung's V20Gy increased by 1.9% under the worst range scenario. No substantial change in the DVHs of range scenarios were observed between the robustly and non-robustly optimized plan.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In the two investigated cases, robustness to range uncertainties was not improved in robustly optimized versus non-robustly optimized plans. A larger study comprising more patients and treatment sites remains to be performed to adequately assess the necessity of robust optimization of MBRT plans to range uncertainties.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 6","pages":"4785-4792"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17771","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of range uncertainties for intensity-modulated mixed electron-photon radiation therapy\",\"authors\":\"Veng Jean Heng,&nbsp;Marc-André Renaud,&nbsp;Monica Serban,&nbsp;Jan Seuntjens\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the context of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy (MBRT), while the necessity of robust optimization to setup uncertainties is well-established, range uncertainties have yet to be investigated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study provides the first assessment of the impact of range uncertainties on MBRT plans.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The percent depth dose of 2 electron beams (6 MeV and 20 MeV) and 1 photon beam (6 MV) are calculated by Monte Carlo using EGSnrc in slab phantoms. Range uncertainties are simulated by generating two copies of the phantom with each voxel's mass density upscaled or downscaled by 3.5%. Two clinical plans for a leg sarcoma case and a post-mastectomy breast case were replanned with MBRT with 2 optimization methods: once without robust optimization and once with robust to both setup and range uncertainties.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Dose discrepancies between the percent depth doses of density-scaled phantoms and the nominal phantom were found to be much larger for electron beams than photons with maximum differences of 6.9% (6 MeV) and 5.5% (20 MeV) versus 1.6% (6 MV) of the maximum dose. In both clinical cases, the region of largest dose discrepancy between the range and nominal scenarios was found to be along the electron's beam path, starting immediately downstream from the target and within a few cm. Even without robust optimization, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of all relevant structures were not meaningfully degraded under range scenarios. In the breast plan, the ipsilateral lung's V20Gy increased by 1.9% under the worst range scenario. No substantial change in the DVHs of range scenarios were observed between the robustly and non-robustly optimized plan.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the two investigated cases, robustness to range uncertainties was not improved in robustly optimized versus non-robustly optimized plans. A larger study comprising more patients and treatment sites remains to be performed to adequately assess the necessity of robust optimization of MBRT plans to range uncertainties.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 6\",\"pages\":\"4785-4792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.17771\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17771\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.17771","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在混合电子-光子放射治疗(MBRT)的背景下,虽然建立不确定性的鲁棒优化的必要性已经确立,但范围不确定性尚未得到研究。目的:本研究首次评估距离不确定性对MBRT计划的影响。方法:利用EGSnrc,用蒙特卡罗方法计算了2束电子束(6 MeV和20 MeV)和1束光子(6 MV)在板状幻影中的百分比深度剂量。范围不确定性通过生成两个幻影副本来模拟,每个体素的质量密度按3.5%的比例放大或缩小。用MBRT重新规划了一个腿部肉瘤病例和一个乳房切除术后乳房病例的两个临床计划,有2种优化方法:一次没有鲁棒优化,一次对设置和范围不确定性都有鲁棒优化。结果:电子束的密度标度幻像与标称幻像的百分比深度剂量差异比光子大得多,最大差异为6.9% (6 MeV)和5.5% (20 MeV),最大剂量差异为1.6% (6 MV)。在这两个临床病例中,范围和标称情况之间的最大剂量差异区域被发现沿着电子束路径,从目标下游开始,在几厘米内。即使没有稳健的优化,所有相关结构的剂量-体积直方图(dvh)在范围情景下也没有明显的退化。在乳腺方案中,最差范围下同侧肺V20Gy增加1.9%。在稳健优化方案和非稳健优化方案之间,距离方案的dvh没有明显变化。结论:在两个研究案例中,鲁棒优化方案与非鲁棒优化方案相比,对距离不确定性的鲁棒性没有提高。一项包含更多患者和治疗地点的更大规模的研究仍有待进行,以充分评估MBRT计划稳健优化的必要性,以应对不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of range uncertainties for intensity-modulated mixed electron-photon radiation therapy

Impact of range uncertainties for intensity-modulated mixed electron-photon radiation therapy

Background

In the context of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy (MBRT), while the necessity of robust optimization to setup uncertainties is well-established, range uncertainties have yet to be investigated.

Purpose

This study provides the first assessment of the impact of range uncertainties on MBRT plans.

Methods

The percent depth dose of 2 electron beams (6 MeV and 20 MeV) and 1 photon beam (6 MV) are calculated by Monte Carlo using EGSnrc in slab phantoms. Range uncertainties are simulated by generating two copies of the phantom with each voxel's mass density upscaled or downscaled by 3.5%. Two clinical plans for a leg sarcoma case and a post-mastectomy breast case were replanned with MBRT with 2 optimization methods: once without robust optimization and once with robust to both setup and range uncertainties.

Results

Dose discrepancies between the percent depth doses of density-scaled phantoms and the nominal phantom were found to be much larger for electron beams than photons with maximum differences of 6.9% (6 MeV) and 5.5% (20 MeV) versus 1.6% (6 MV) of the maximum dose. In both clinical cases, the region of largest dose discrepancy between the range and nominal scenarios was found to be along the electron's beam path, starting immediately downstream from the target and within a few cm. Even without robust optimization, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of all relevant structures were not meaningfully degraded under range scenarios. In the breast plan, the ipsilateral lung's V20Gy increased by 1.9% under the worst range scenario. No substantial change in the DVHs of range scenarios were observed between the robustly and non-robustly optimized plan.

Conclusion

In the two investigated cases, robustness to range uncertainties was not improved in robustly optimized versus non-robustly optimized plans. A larger study comprising more patients and treatment sites remains to be performed to adequately assess the necessity of robust optimization of MBRT plans to range uncertainties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信