不同头体位的颅内压和脉搏。

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain communications Pub Date : 2025-03-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf115
Matthew J Bancroft, Eleanor M Moncur, Amy L Peters, Linda D'Antona, Lewis Thorne, Laurence D Watkins, Brian L Day, Ahmed K Toma
{"title":"不同头体位的颅内压和脉搏。","authors":"Matthew J Bancroft, Eleanor M Moncur, Amy L Peters, Linda D'Antona, Lewis Thorne, Laurence D Watkins, Brian L Day, Ahmed K Toma","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracranial pressure (ICP) is typically measured with the head in a neutral position whilst the body is in an upright or supine posture. The effect of body position on ICP is well studied, with ICP greater when supine than when upright. In daily life the head is frequently moved away from the neutral position but how this impacts ICP dynamics is unclear. Knowledge of ICP dynamics in different head-on-body positions may improve future treatments that restore normal ICP dynamics such as CSF drainage shunts. We recruited 57 relatively well, ambulatory patients undergoing clinical ICP monitoring for investigation of possible CSF dynamics disturbances to a single-centre, cross-sectional study. Forty-one patients were non-shunted, seven had a working shunt and nine had a malfunctioning shunt. We measured ICP and ICP pulsatility (pulse amplitude) over 10 or 20 s in different combinations of head and body positions. Positions included right and left head turn and forward tilt in upright (seated, standing) and supine body positions, and right and left lateral tilt and backward tilt in upright body positions. ICP increased by 3-9 mmHg, on average, when the head moved away from neutral to each head position in upright and supine body positions, except for head forward tilt when supine, where ICP did not change. The increase in ICP with head turn and forward tilt in upright body positions was larger in patients with a malfunctioning shunt than with no shunt or a functioning shunt. Pulsatility also increased by 0.5-2 mmHg on average when the head moved away from neutral to each head position in upright and supine body positions, except for head forward tilt in upright body positions where pulsatility slightly decreased by 0.7 mmHg on average. ICP and pulsatility generally increase when the head is moved away from the neutral position, but this depends on a combination of head and body position and shunt status. We propose our results can be explained by a combination of changes to neck vasculature and head orientation relative to gravity. Our findings provide potential reason for patient reports that ICP-related symptoms can be induced and/or exacerbated by head movement and could explain behaviours that avoid excess head movement, such as turning the body rather than the head when looking to the side. Our data describe the predicted change in ICP in different head and body positions and could underpin future smart shunt design.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 2","pages":"fcaf115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial pressure and pulsatility in different head and body positions.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Bancroft, Eleanor M Moncur, Amy L Peters, Linda D'Antona, Lewis Thorne, Laurence D Watkins, Brian L Day, Ahmed K Toma\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intracranial pressure (ICP) is typically measured with the head in a neutral position whilst the body is in an upright or supine posture. The effect of body position on ICP is well studied, with ICP greater when supine than when upright. In daily life the head is frequently moved away from the neutral position but how this impacts ICP dynamics is unclear. Knowledge of ICP dynamics in different head-on-body positions may improve future treatments that restore normal ICP dynamics such as CSF drainage shunts. We recruited 57 relatively well, ambulatory patients undergoing clinical ICP monitoring for investigation of possible CSF dynamics disturbances to a single-centre, cross-sectional study. Forty-one patients were non-shunted, seven had a working shunt and nine had a malfunctioning shunt. We measured ICP and ICP pulsatility (pulse amplitude) over 10 or 20 s in different combinations of head and body positions. Positions included right and left head turn and forward tilt in upright (seated, standing) and supine body positions, and right and left lateral tilt and backward tilt in upright body positions. ICP increased by 3-9 mmHg, on average, when the head moved away from neutral to each head position in upright and supine body positions, except for head forward tilt when supine, where ICP did not change. The increase in ICP with head turn and forward tilt in upright body positions was larger in patients with a malfunctioning shunt than with no shunt or a functioning shunt. Pulsatility also increased by 0.5-2 mmHg on average when the head moved away from neutral to each head position in upright and supine body positions, except for head forward tilt in upright body positions where pulsatility slightly decreased by 0.7 mmHg on average. ICP and pulsatility generally increase when the head is moved away from the neutral position, but this depends on a combination of head and body position and shunt status. We propose our results can be explained by a combination of changes to neck vasculature and head orientation relative to gravity. Our findings provide potential reason for patient reports that ICP-related symptoms can be induced and/or exacerbated by head movement and could explain behaviours that avoid excess head movement, such as turning the body rather than the head when looking to the side. Our data describe the predicted change in ICP in different head and body positions and could underpin future smart shunt design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain communications\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"fcaf115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颅内压(ICP)通常是在头部处于中性位置而身体处于直立或仰卧姿势时测量的。体位对颅内压的影响已被充分研究,仰卧时颅内压大于直立时。在日常生活中,头部经常远离中性位置,但这如何影响ICP动态尚不清楚。了解不同体位的颅内压动力学可以改善未来恢复正常颅内压动力学的治疗方法,如脑脊液引流分流术。我们招募了57名相对较好的门诊患者进行临床ICP监测,以调查可能的脑脊液动力学干扰,进行单中心横断面研究。41例患者未分流,7例分流器正常工作,9例分流器故障。我们测量了不同头部和身体位置组合在10或20秒内的ICP和ICP脉动(脉冲振幅)。体位包括直立(坐、站)和仰卧体位时左右头转动和前倾,直立体位时左右侧倾和后倾。当头部从中性位置移动到直立和仰卧位置时,ICP平均增加3-9 mmHg,除了仰卧时头部前倾,ICP没有变化。在分流器功能不全或分流器功能正常的患者中,头部转动和直立体位前倾的颅内压升高更大。在直立和仰卧体位中,当头部从中性位置移动到每个头部位置时,脉搏率平均增加0.5-2 mmHg,但在直立体位中,头部向前倾斜时,脉搏率平均略有下降0.7 mmHg。当头部远离中性位置时,ICP和脉搏通常会增加,但这取决于头部和身体位置以及分流状态的组合。我们认为我们的结果可以用颈部血管系统的变化和头部相对于重力的方向的变化来解释。我们的研究结果为患者报告的头部运动可诱发和/或加重icp相关症状提供了潜在的原因,并可以解释避免过度头部运动的行为,例如在看向一侧时转动身体而不是头部。我们的数据描述了不同头部和身体姿势下ICP的预测变化,可以为未来的智能分流设计奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial pressure and pulsatility in different head and body positions.

Intracranial pressure (ICP) is typically measured with the head in a neutral position whilst the body is in an upright or supine posture. The effect of body position on ICP is well studied, with ICP greater when supine than when upright. In daily life the head is frequently moved away from the neutral position but how this impacts ICP dynamics is unclear. Knowledge of ICP dynamics in different head-on-body positions may improve future treatments that restore normal ICP dynamics such as CSF drainage shunts. We recruited 57 relatively well, ambulatory patients undergoing clinical ICP monitoring for investigation of possible CSF dynamics disturbances to a single-centre, cross-sectional study. Forty-one patients were non-shunted, seven had a working shunt and nine had a malfunctioning shunt. We measured ICP and ICP pulsatility (pulse amplitude) over 10 or 20 s in different combinations of head and body positions. Positions included right and left head turn and forward tilt in upright (seated, standing) and supine body positions, and right and left lateral tilt and backward tilt in upright body positions. ICP increased by 3-9 mmHg, on average, when the head moved away from neutral to each head position in upright and supine body positions, except for head forward tilt when supine, where ICP did not change. The increase in ICP with head turn and forward tilt in upright body positions was larger in patients with a malfunctioning shunt than with no shunt or a functioning shunt. Pulsatility also increased by 0.5-2 mmHg on average when the head moved away from neutral to each head position in upright and supine body positions, except for head forward tilt in upright body positions where pulsatility slightly decreased by 0.7 mmHg on average. ICP and pulsatility generally increase when the head is moved away from the neutral position, but this depends on a combination of head and body position and shunt status. We propose our results can be explained by a combination of changes to neck vasculature and head orientation relative to gravity. Our findings provide potential reason for patient reports that ICP-related symptoms can be induced and/or exacerbated by head movement and could explain behaviours that avoid excess head movement, such as turning the body rather than the head when looking to the side. Our data describe the predicted change in ICP in different head and body positions and could underpin future smart shunt design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信