{"title":"诱导健康步行者不对称步态:综述。","authors":"Gert Van Der Velde, Henri Laloyaux, Renaud Ronsse","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1463382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gait symmetry between both legs is a typical hallmark of healthy walking. In contrast, several pathologies induce asymmetry in the gait pattern, regarding both spatial and temporal features. This can be due to either an asymmetrical change of the body morphology-e.g., after an amputation or an injury-or a damage in the brain-such as stroke or cerebral palsy. This deficit in gait symmetry usually induces higher metabolic effort in locomotion and might further accelerate severe comorbidities such as osteoarthritis and low back pain. Consequently, several assistive devices-such as active exoskeletons or prostheses-are currently developed to mitigate gait asymmetry and restore a healthier gait pattern. Typically, the development of such devices requires extensive tests and validations, and it is practically and ethically not always desirable to recruit disabled patients to run these tests in the preliminary stages of development. In this review paper, we collect and analyse the different reversible interventions described in the literature that can induce asymmetry in the gait pattern of healthy walkers. We perform a systematic literature research by exploring five databases, i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. This narrative review identifies more than 150 articles reporting 16 different interventional methods used to induce asymmetric gait pattern in healthy walkers or with the potential to do so. These interventions are categorized according to their mode of action, and their effects on spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics are summarized adopting a macroscopic viewpoint. Interventions are compared in terms of efficacy, maturity of the results, and applicability. Recommendations are provided for guiding researchers in the field in using each of the identified manipulations in its most relevant research contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1463382"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.\",\"authors\":\"Gert Van Der Velde, Henri Laloyaux, Renaud Ronsse\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fresc.2025.1463382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gait symmetry between both legs is a typical hallmark of healthy walking. In contrast, several pathologies induce asymmetry in the gait pattern, regarding both spatial and temporal features. This can be due to either an asymmetrical change of the body morphology-e.g., after an amputation or an injury-or a damage in the brain-such as stroke or cerebral palsy. This deficit in gait symmetry usually induces higher metabolic effort in locomotion and might further accelerate severe comorbidities such as osteoarthritis and low back pain. Consequently, several assistive devices-such as active exoskeletons or prostheses-are currently developed to mitigate gait asymmetry and restore a healthier gait pattern. Typically, the development of such devices requires extensive tests and validations, and it is practically and ethically not always desirable to recruit disabled patients to run these tests in the preliminary stages of development. In this review paper, we collect and analyse the different reversible interventions described in the literature that can induce asymmetry in the gait pattern of healthy walkers. We perform a systematic literature research by exploring five databases, i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. This narrative review identifies more than 150 articles reporting 16 different interventional methods used to induce asymmetric gait pattern in healthy walkers or with the potential to do so. These interventions are categorized according to their mode of action, and their effects on spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics are summarized adopting a macroscopic viewpoint. Interventions are compared in terms of efficacy, maturity of the results, and applicability. Recommendations are provided for guiding researchers in the field in using each of the identified manipulations in its most relevant research contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1463382\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955677/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1463382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1463382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
双腿匀称的步态是健康行走的典型标志。相反,一些病理诱导不对称的步态模式,关于空间和时间特征。这可能是由于身体形态的不对称变化,例如:在截肢或受伤或大脑受损后,如中风或脑瘫。这种步态对称的缺陷通常会导致运动时更高的代谢努力,并可能进一步加速严重的合并症,如骨关节炎和腰痛。因此,一些辅助设备,如主动外骨骼或假体,目前正在开发减轻步态不对称和恢复健康的步态模式。通常,这种设备的开发需要大量的测试和验证,在开发的初步阶段招募残疾患者进行这些测试在实践和道德上并不总是可取的。在这篇综述文章中,我们收集并分析了文献中描述的不同的可逆干预措施,这些干预措施可以诱导健康步行者的步态模式不对称。我们通过检索Pubmed、Embase、Web of Science、b谷歌Scholar和Scopus五个数据库进行了系统的文献研究。这篇叙述性综述确定了150多篇文章,报道了16种不同的干预方法,用于诱导健康步行者的不对称步态模式或有可能这样做。这些干预措施按其作用方式进行了分类,并从宏观角度总结了它们对时空参数、关节运动学和动力学的影响。对干预措施的有效性、结果的成熟度和适用性进行比较。为指导该领域的研究人员在其最相关的研究背景下使用每种确定的操作提供了建议。
Inducing asymmetric gait in healthy walkers: a review.
Gait symmetry between both legs is a typical hallmark of healthy walking. In contrast, several pathologies induce asymmetry in the gait pattern, regarding both spatial and temporal features. This can be due to either an asymmetrical change of the body morphology-e.g., after an amputation or an injury-or a damage in the brain-such as stroke or cerebral palsy. This deficit in gait symmetry usually induces higher metabolic effort in locomotion and might further accelerate severe comorbidities such as osteoarthritis and low back pain. Consequently, several assistive devices-such as active exoskeletons or prostheses-are currently developed to mitigate gait asymmetry and restore a healthier gait pattern. Typically, the development of such devices requires extensive tests and validations, and it is practically and ethically not always desirable to recruit disabled patients to run these tests in the preliminary stages of development. In this review paper, we collect and analyse the different reversible interventions described in the literature that can induce asymmetry in the gait pattern of healthy walkers. We perform a systematic literature research by exploring five databases, i.e., Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus. This narrative review identifies more than 150 articles reporting 16 different interventional methods used to induce asymmetric gait pattern in healthy walkers or with the potential to do so. These interventions are categorized according to their mode of action, and their effects on spatiotemporal parameters, joint kinematics and kinetics are summarized adopting a macroscopic viewpoint. Interventions are compared in terms of efficacy, maturity of the results, and applicability. Recommendations are provided for guiding researchers in the field in using each of the identified manipulations in its most relevant research contexts.