患者和临床医生对肌肉骨骼物理治疗服务中远程医疗的看法-对证据基础的系统回顾。

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000789
Anthony Smith, Sue Innes
{"title":"患者和临床医生对肌肉骨骼物理治疗服务中远程医疗的看法-对证据基础的系统回顾。","authors":"Anthony Smith, Sue Innes","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Telehealth has been at the forefront of healthcare delivery since the Covid-19 pandemic with a prompt shift in transition from face-to-face delivery to remote contact. This critical review aims to understand patient and clinician views of telehealth adoption regarding effectiveness and satisfaction within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy services. A systematic process was used to search for evidence within 6 databases (CINAHL, PyscINFO, Medline, AMED, EMCARE, EMBASE) utilising clear inclusion and exclusion criteria in August 2024. Articles published in English between 2019-2024 were searched, a total of 394 articles were identified and 10 articles were included in the review. Methodological quality was evaluated using the CASP, JBI and QuADS tools. Findings were evaluated via consensus and showed clear patient and clinician satisfaction with positive themes of reduced travel, reduced physical burden, flexibility/accessibility and negative themes of reduced physical contact, computer literacy and privacy infringements. Quality analysis identified non-response bias, sampling bias, and participants mix as risks to overall validity. Telehealth has shown to be an effective and transformative model of healthcare delivery for musculoskeletal services, especially in improving access and convenience for patients. Implications for practice suggest a need for a hybrid model of care, enhanced training, and improved data security. Future research should focus on satisfaction within condition specific musculoskeletal health, overall cost-effectiveness, health equity, and the integration of advanced technologies to ensure telehealth can be a sustainable and inclusive part of the healthcare landscape moving forwards.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 3","pages":"e0000789"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and clinician perceptions of telehealth in musculoskeletal physiotherapy services - A systematic review of the evidence-base.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Smith, Sue Innes\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Telehealth has been at the forefront of healthcare delivery since the Covid-19 pandemic with a prompt shift in transition from face-to-face delivery to remote contact. This critical review aims to understand patient and clinician views of telehealth adoption regarding effectiveness and satisfaction within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy services. A systematic process was used to search for evidence within 6 databases (CINAHL, PyscINFO, Medline, AMED, EMCARE, EMBASE) utilising clear inclusion and exclusion criteria in August 2024. Articles published in English between 2019-2024 were searched, a total of 394 articles were identified and 10 articles were included in the review. Methodological quality was evaluated using the CASP, JBI and QuADS tools. Findings were evaluated via consensus and showed clear patient and clinician satisfaction with positive themes of reduced travel, reduced physical burden, flexibility/accessibility and negative themes of reduced physical contact, computer literacy and privacy infringements. Quality analysis identified non-response bias, sampling bias, and participants mix as risks to overall validity. Telehealth has shown to be an effective and transformative model of healthcare delivery for musculoskeletal services, especially in improving access and convenience for patients. Implications for practice suggest a need for a hybrid model of care, enhanced training, and improved data security. Future research should focus on satisfaction within condition specific musculoskeletal health, overall cost-effectiveness, health equity, and the integration of advanced technologies to ensure telehealth can be a sustainable and inclusive part of the healthcare landscape moving forwards.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"e0000789\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957330/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 Covid-19 大流行以来,远程医疗一直处于医疗保健服务的最前沿,并迅速从面对面服务转变为远程联系。本评论旨在了解患者和临床医生对肌肉骨骼(MSK)物理治疗服务中采用远程医疗的有效性和满意度的看法。本研究采用系统化流程,利用明确的纳入和排除标准,于 2024 年 8 月在 6 个数据库(CINAHL、PyscINFO、Medline、AMED、EMCARE、EMBASE)中搜索证据。共检索到 2019-2024 年间发表的英文文章 394 篇,其中 10 篇被纳入综述。采用 CASP、JBI 和 QuADS 工具对方法学质量进行了评估。研究结果通过共识进行评估,显示患者和临床医生对减少旅行、减轻身体负担、灵活性/可及性等积极主题以及减少身体接触、计算机知识和隐私侵犯等消极主题表示满意。质量分析表明,非响应偏差、抽样偏差和参与者混合是影响总体有效性的风险因素。远程医疗已被证明是一种有效的、变革性的肌肉骨骼医疗服务模式,尤其是在改善患者的就医途径和便利性方面。对实践的影响表明,需要采用混合护理模式、加强培训和提高数据安全性。未来的研究应重点关注特定条件下肌肉骨骼健康的满意度、整体成本效益、健康公平性以及先进技术的整合,以确保远程医疗能够成为医疗保健领域可持续发展和具有包容性的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and clinician perceptions of telehealth in musculoskeletal physiotherapy services - A systematic review of the evidence-base.

Telehealth has been at the forefront of healthcare delivery since the Covid-19 pandemic with a prompt shift in transition from face-to-face delivery to remote contact. This critical review aims to understand patient and clinician views of telehealth adoption regarding effectiveness and satisfaction within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy services. A systematic process was used to search for evidence within 6 databases (CINAHL, PyscINFO, Medline, AMED, EMCARE, EMBASE) utilising clear inclusion and exclusion criteria in August 2024. Articles published in English between 2019-2024 were searched, a total of 394 articles were identified and 10 articles were included in the review. Methodological quality was evaluated using the CASP, JBI and QuADS tools. Findings were evaluated via consensus and showed clear patient and clinician satisfaction with positive themes of reduced travel, reduced physical burden, flexibility/accessibility and negative themes of reduced physical contact, computer literacy and privacy infringements. Quality analysis identified non-response bias, sampling bias, and participants mix as risks to overall validity. Telehealth has shown to be an effective and transformative model of healthcare delivery for musculoskeletal services, especially in improving access and convenience for patients. Implications for practice suggest a need for a hybrid model of care, enhanced training, and improved data security. Future research should focus on satisfaction within condition specific musculoskeletal health, overall cost-effectiveness, health equity, and the integration of advanced technologies to ensure telehealth can be a sustainable and inclusive part of the healthcare landscape moving forwards.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信