Hua Wang, Nan Hao, Nan Liu, Chunying Mou, Jieqiong Li, Lei Meng, Jing Wu
{"title":"协作赋权教育对同时接受化疗放疗的食管癌患者的心理压力、生活质量和营养状况的影响","authors":"Hua Wang, Nan Hao, Nan Liu, Chunying Mou, Jieqiong Li, Lei Meng, Jing Wu","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02618-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Esophageal cancer (EC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) often face significant psychological distress, impaired quality of life (QoL), and poor nutritional status. This study evaluates the impact of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education (MCEE) in addressing these challenges. According to the inclusion criteria, 160 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to either the MCEE group (n = 80) or the control group (n = 80). The MCEE group received a tailored program consisting of psychological support, nutritional counseling, and educational interventions. Outcome measures, including psychological distress (using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), quality of life (using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), and nutritional status (using hemoglobin, serum protein, and albumin levels), were evaluated at baseline and after four cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Post-intervention, the MCEE group showed significant improvements in psychological distress. QoL improvements were noted across all functional domains, including physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functions (all Ps ≤ 0.001), with significant reductions in fatigue, insomnia, and pain. Nutritional status also improved, with higher levels of hemoglobin, serum protein, and albumin, as well as less weight loss in the intervention group (all Ps ≤ 0.001). MCEE effectively reduces psychological distress, improves QoL, and enhances nutritional status in EC patients undergoing CCRT. This patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach offers a promising strategy for improving treatment outcomes and overall well-being in cancer care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Collaborative Empowerment Education on Psychological Distress, Quality of Life, and Nutritional Status in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Hua Wang, Nan Hao, Nan Liu, Chunying Mou, Jieqiong Li, Lei Meng, Jing Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02618-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Esophageal cancer (EC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) often face significant psychological distress, impaired quality of life (QoL), and poor nutritional status. This study evaluates the impact of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education (MCEE) in addressing these challenges. According to the inclusion criteria, 160 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to either the MCEE group (n = 80) or the control group (n = 80). The MCEE group received a tailored program consisting of psychological support, nutritional counseling, and educational interventions. Outcome measures, including psychological distress (using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), quality of life (using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), and nutritional status (using hemoglobin, serum protein, and albumin levels), were evaluated at baseline and after four cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Post-intervention, the MCEE group showed significant improvements in psychological distress. QoL improvements were noted across all functional domains, including physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functions (all Ps ≤ 0.001), with significant reductions in fatigue, insomnia, and pain. Nutritional status also improved, with higher levels of hemoglobin, serum protein, and albumin, as well as less weight loss in the intervention group (all Ps ≤ 0.001). MCEE effectively reduces psychological distress, improves QoL, and enhances nutritional status in EC patients undergoing CCRT. This patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach offers a promising strategy for improving treatment outcomes and overall well-being in cancer care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02618-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02618-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Collaborative Empowerment Education on Psychological Distress, Quality of Life, and Nutritional Status in Esophageal Cancer Patients Undergoing Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
Esophageal cancer (EC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) often face significant psychological distress, impaired quality of life (QoL), and poor nutritional status. This study evaluates the impact of multidisciplinary collaborative empowerment education (MCEE) in addressing these challenges. According to the inclusion criteria, 160 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to either the MCEE group (n = 80) or the control group (n = 80). The MCEE group received a tailored program consisting of psychological support, nutritional counseling, and educational interventions. Outcome measures, including psychological distress (using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), quality of life (using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), and nutritional status (using hemoglobin, serum protein, and albumin levels), were evaluated at baseline and after four cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Post-intervention, the MCEE group showed significant improvements in psychological distress. QoL improvements were noted across all functional domains, including physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functions (all Ps ≤ 0.001), with significant reductions in fatigue, insomnia, and pain. Nutritional status also improved, with higher levels of hemoglobin, serum protein, and albumin, as well as less weight loss in the intervention group (all Ps ≤ 0.001). MCEE effectively reduces psychological distress, improves QoL, and enhances nutritional status in EC patients undergoing CCRT. This patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach offers a promising strategy for improving treatment outcomes and overall well-being in cancer care.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.