探索数字健康素养的社区成员和医疗团队在深南方:一项准实验研究。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251325581
Gabrielle B Rocque, Nicole L Henderson, Keyonsis Hildreth, Noon Eltoum, Omari Whitlow, Loretta Herring, Stacey Ingram, Daniel I Chu, Connie C Shao, Claudia Hardy, Timiya S Nolan, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Courtney P Williams
{"title":"探索数字健康素养的社区成员和医疗团队在深南方:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Gabrielle B Rocque, Nicole L Henderson, Keyonsis Hildreth, Noon Eltoum, Omari Whitlow, Loretta Herring, Stacey Ingram, Daniel I Chu, Connie C Shao, Claudia Hardy, Timiya S Nolan, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Courtney P Williams","doi":"10.1177/20552076251325581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given increasing technology reliance, there is a need for a deeper understanding of individual and community-level comfort with technology as it pertains to basic and more complex healthcare-related skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to engage participants in conversations about digital health literacy to facilitate awareness and to compare digital health literacy for community members, healthcare providers, non-clinical navigators, and community health advisors and county coordinators (henceforth referred to as CHAs) in the Deep South (AL, MS, FL). Interactive community conversations on digital health literacy were given in community (n = 16) and clinical (n = 5) settings. Participants completed pre- and post- surveys assessing personal comfort performing technological tasks on a 5-point scale. Mixed models estimated both within- and between-role changes in self-reported comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 248 participants, 56% were community members, 18% healthcare providers, 17% CHAs, and 8% non-clinical navigators. Community members had the lowest personal comfort performing every task assessed (all p < .05). In the pre-test, the largest differences in reported personal comfort performing tasks were seen for basic skills including scanning QR codes (mean comfort score: community members 2.7 [SD 1.5] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001) and sharing a website (mean comfort score: community members 2.9 [SD 1.6] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001). Pre- vs. post-community conversation, community members experienced significant increases in their personal comfort scanning QR codes (β=0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.0), creating an online account (general use) (β=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), and using a smartphone (β=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As technological advances continue to be implemented, gaps in digital health literacy must be addressed. Non-clinical navigators may play a future role in teaching patients technology skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251325581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of digital health literacy among community members and healthcare teams in the deep south: A quasi-experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle B Rocque, Nicole L Henderson, Keyonsis Hildreth, Noon Eltoum, Omari Whitlow, Loretta Herring, Stacey Ingram, Daniel I Chu, Connie C Shao, Claudia Hardy, Timiya S Nolan, Chelsea McGowan, Jennifer Young Pierce, Courtney P Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076251325581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given increasing technology reliance, there is a need for a deeper understanding of individual and community-level comfort with technology as it pertains to basic and more complex healthcare-related skills.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to engage participants in conversations about digital health literacy to facilitate awareness and to compare digital health literacy for community members, healthcare providers, non-clinical navigators, and community health advisors and county coordinators (henceforth referred to as CHAs) in the Deep South (AL, MS, FL). Interactive community conversations on digital health literacy were given in community (n = 16) and clinical (n = 5) settings. Participants completed pre- and post- surveys assessing personal comfort performing technological tasks on a 5-point scale. Mixed models estimated both within- and between-role changes in self-reported comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 248 participants, 56% were community members, 18% healthcare providers, 17% CHAs, and 8% non-clinical navigators. Community members had the lowest personal comfort performing every task assessed (all p < .05). In the pre-test, the largest differences in reported personal comfort performing tasks were seen for basic skills including scanning QR codes (mean comfort score: community members 2.7 [SD 1.5] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001) and sharing a website (mean comfort score: community members 2.9 [SD 1.6] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001). Pre- vs. post-community conversation, community members experienced significant increases in their personal comfort scanning QR codes (β=0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.0), creating an online account (general use) (β=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), and using a smartphone (β=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As technological advances continue to be implemented, gaps in digital health literacy must be addressed. Non-clinical navigators may play a future role in teaching patients technology skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20552076251325581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952038/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251325581\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251325581","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于对技术的依赖日益增加,有必要更深入地了解个人和社区对技术的满意程度,因为它涉及基本和更复杂的卫生保健相关技能。方法:这项准实验研究的目的是让参与者参与关于数字健康素养的对话,以促进认识,并比较深南(AL, MS, FL)社区成员、医疗保健提供者、非临床导航员、社区健康顾问和县协调员(以下简称cha)的数字健康素养。在社区(n = 16)和临床(n = 5)环境中进行了关于数字健康素养的互动社区对话。参与者完成了以5分制评估个人执行技术任务舒适度的前后调查。混合模型估计了自我报告的舒适度在角色内和角色间的变化。结果:248名参与者中,56%是社区成员,18%是医疗保健提供者,17%是CHAs, 8%是非临床导航员。社区成员在执行所评估的每项任务时的个人舒适度最低(所有p结论:随着技术进步的继续实施,必须解决数字卫生素养方面的差距。未来,非临床导航员可能会在教授患者技术技能方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of digital health literacy among community members and healthcare teams in the deep south: A quasi-experimental study.

Background: Given increasing technology reliance, there is a need for a deeper understanding of individual and community-level comfort with technology as it pertains to basic and more complex healthcare-related skills.

Methods: The objective of this quasi-experimental study was to engage participants in conversations about digital health literacy to facilitate awareness and to compare digital health literacy for community members, healthcare providers, non-clinical navigators, and community health advisors and county coordinators (henceforth referred to as CHAs) in the Deep South (AL, MS, FL). Interactive community conversations on digital health literacy were given in community (n = 16) and clinical (n = 5) settings. Participants completed pre- and post- surveys assessing personal comfort performing technological tasks on a 5-point scale. Mixed models estimated both within- and between-role changes in self-reported comfort.

Results: Of 248 participants, 56% were community members, 18% healthcare providers, 17% CHAs, and 8% non-clinical navigators. Community members had the lowest personal comfort performing every task assessed (all p < .05). In the pre-test, the largest differences in reported personal comfort performing tasks were seen for basic skills including scanning QR codes (mean comfort score: community members 2.7 [SD 1.5] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001) and sharing a website (mean comfort score: community members 2.9 [SD 1.6] vs. non-clinical navigator 4.5 [1.0], p < .001). Pre- vs. post-community conversation, community members experienced significant increases in their personal comfort scanning QR codes (β=0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.0), creating an online account (general use) (β=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.6), and using a smartphone (β=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.5).

Conclusions: As technological advances continue to be implemented, gaps in digital health literacy must be addressed. Non-clinical navigators may play a future role in teaching patients technology skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信