急诊科急性心衰治疗心衰亚型综合分析

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai, Dillon J Dzikowicz, Ying Xue, Robert Block, Rebecca G Tucker, Mary G Carey
{"title":"急诊科急性心衰治疗心衰亚型综合分析","authors":"Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai, Dillon J Dzikowicz, Ying Xue, Robert Block, Rebecca G Tucker, Mary G Carey","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients' characteristics across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presenting at the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; P < .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, and orthopnea (34% and 51%; P < .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .001), and hematocrit differences (P < .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses' recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive Analysis of Heart Failure Subtypes Presenting at Emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure Management.\",\"authors\":\"Sunita Pokhrel Bhattarai, Dillon J Dzikowicz, Ying Xue, Robert Block, Rebecca G Tucker, Mary G Carey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients' characteristics across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presenting at the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; P < .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, and orthopnea (34% and 51%; P < .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .001), and hematocrit differences (P < .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses' recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:尽管超声心动图和生物标志物有了进步,但心衰类别的病理生理复杂性仍然不完全清楚。本研究分析了急诊科出现的射血分数降低型心衰、射血分数中等型心衰和射血分数保留型心衰患者的特征。方法:对2016-2023年954例急性心力衰竭患者的电子病历进行回顾性分析。数据收集于病人分诊、急诊科和住院期间。生存分析采用Kaplan-Meier估计,弹性网络模型用于处理多重共线性和预测变量的高维性。结果:患者(年龄中位数为71岁)分为射血分数降低的心力衰竭(n = 363)、射血分数中等的心力衰竭(n = 131)和射血分数保持的心力衰竭(n = 460)。保留射血分数的心力衰竭患者年龄较大(80岁vs 77岁vs 74岁;P < 0.001)。心力衰竭伴射血分数降低时,心脏扩大、胸腔积液和矫形通气的患病率更高(34%和51%;P < 0.001),舒张压升高(P < 0.001),肌酐,n端前b型利钠肽(P < 0.001)和红细胞压积差异(P < 0.05)与保留射血分数的心力衰竭相比。超声心动图测量结果在不同亚型间差异显著。院内预测模型的曲线下面积为0.84(灵敏度91%,特异性50%);30天模型的曲线下面积为0.80(灵敏度98%,特异性50%)。讨论:HF亚型表现出不同的临床和生物标志物特征。急诊护士在初步评估时对这些差异的认识可能会加强风险分层和量身定制的干预措施(例如,对射血分数降低的心力衰竭优先使用利尿剂,对射血分数保留的心力衰竭的合并症进行管理),改善结果。将特定亚型的数据整合到协议中可以优化急诊科的护理,特别是在长时间的住院期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive Analysis of Heart Failure Subtypes Presenting at Emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure Management.

Introduction: Despite advances in echocardiography and biomarkers, the pathophysiological complexities among heart failure categories remain incompletely understood. This study analyzed patients' characteristics across heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, heart failure with midrange ejection fraction, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction presenting at the emergency department.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 954 patients with acute heart failure (2016-2023) using electronic health records. Data were collected from patient triage and the emergency department and during hospitalization. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and an elastic net model was used to handle multicollinearity and high dimensionality in predictor variables.

Results: Patients (median age, 71 years) were categorized as heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 363), heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (n = 131), and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n = 460). Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction were older (80 vs 77 vs 74 years; P < .001). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction showed higher prevalence of cardiomegaly, pleural effusion, and orthopnea (34% and 51%; P < .001), elevated diastolic blood pressure (P < .001), creatinine, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P < .001), and hematocrit differences (P < .05) than heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Echocardiographic measures differed significantly across subtypes. In-hospital prediction models achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (91% sensitivity, 50% specificity); 30-day models had an area under the curve of 0.80 (98% sensitivity, 50% specificity).

Discussion: HF subtypes exhibit distinct clinical and biomarker profiles. Emergency nurses' recognition of these differences during initial assessment may enhance risk stratification and tailored interventions (eg, prioritizing diuretics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, managing comorbidities in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction), improving outcomes. Integrating subtype-specific data into protocols could optimize emergency department care, particularly during prolonged boarding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信