一项随机对照试验的放射学分析:与机械对齐相比,运动学对齐可使胫骨关节线角度在单腿站立时更平行于地板。

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Benjamin J Leong, James Corbett, Darren B Chen, George Kirsh, Anthony K L Leong, Jil A Wood, Ashish D Diwan, Gregory C Wernecke, Ian A Harris, Samuel J MacDessi
{"title":"一项随机对照试验的放射学分析:与机械对齐相比,运动学对齐可使胫骨关节线角度在单腿站立时更平行于地板。","authors":"Benjamin J Leong, James Corbett, Darren B Chen, George Kirsh, Anthony K L Leong, Jil A Wood, Ashish D Diwan, Gregory C Wernecke, Ian A Harris, Samuel J MacDessi","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0204.R3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Previous research on knee kinematics has demonstrated that achieving a tibial joint line angle (TJLA) parallel to the floor in the single-leg stance phase of gait may restore native knee kinematics and optimize compartmental compressive loads in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is currently unclear which surgical alignment strategy best achieves this. Therefore, this study sought to determine whether kinematically aligned (KA) or mechanically aligned (MA) TKAs produce a TJLA closer to parallel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 patients were randomized to KA (n = 46) or MA (n = 49). Constitutional joint line obliquity (JLO) was measured from preoperative radiographs; TJLA was measured from postoperative radiographs. The primary outcome was the mean difference in TJLA between KA and MA in single-leg stance. Secondary outcomes included differences in TJLA between apex distal and neutral JLO knees, the proportion of patients with TJLA within approximately 2° of neutral, and changes in constitutional JLO between alignment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In single-leg stance, the mean TJLA was closer to parallel with KA (-2.0° (SD 2.6°)) than MA (-4.5° (SD 1.9°); p < 0.001). Similar mean differences were observed in patients with apex distal JLO (KA -1.4° (SD 2.1°); MA -4.9° (SD 1.8°); p < 0.001) but not neutral JLO (KA -3.7° (SD 2.8°); MA -3.7° (SD 1.9°); p = 0.776). More patients had a TJLA within 2° of parallel with KA (n = 24; 52.2%) than MA (n = 4; 8.2%; p < 0.001), and KA resulted in significantly less change to constitutional JLO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A TJLA parallel to the floor in single-leg stance is achieved more readily with KA than MA, but is dependent on constitutional JLO. A parallel TJLA during this phase of gait is more likely achieved when alignment is individualized to the patient's native anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 4","pages":"413-422"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic alignment achieves a tibial joint line angle that is more parallel to the floor in single-leg stance than mechanical alignment : a radiological analysis of a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin J Leong, James Corbett, Darren B Chen, George Kirsh, Anthony K L Leong, Jil A Wood, Ashish D Diwan, Gregory C Wernecke, Ian A Harris, Samuel J MacDessi\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0204.R3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Previous research on knee kinematics has demonstrated that achieving a tibial joint line angle (TJLA) parallel to the floor in the single-leg stance phase of gait may restore native knee kinematics and optimize compartmental compressive loads in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is currently unclear which surgical alignment strategy best achieves this. Therefore, this study sought to determine whether kinematically aligned (KA) or mechanically aligned (MA) TKAs produce a TJLA closer to parallel.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 patients were randomized to KA (n = 46) or MA (n = 49). Constitutional joint line obliquity (JLO) was measured from preoperative radiographs; TJLA was measured from postoperative radiographs. The primary outcome was the mean difference in TJLA between KA and MA in single-leg stance. Secondary outcomes included differences in TJLA between apex distal and neutral JLO knees, the proportion of patients with TJLA within approximately 2° of neutral, and changes in constitutional JLO between alignment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In single-leg stance, the mean TJLA was closer to parallel with KA (-2.0° (SD 2.6°)) than MA (-4.5° (SD 1.9°); p < 0.001). Similar mean differences were observed in patients with apex distal JLO (KA -1.4° (SD 2.1°); MA -4.9° (SD 1.8°); p < 0.001) but not neutral JLO (KA -3.7° (SD 2.8°); MA -3.7° (SD 1.9°); p = 0.776). More patients had a TJLA within 2° of parallel with KA (n = 24; 52.2%) than MA (n = 4; 8.2%; p < 0.001), and KA resulted in significantly less change to constitutional JLO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A TJLA parallel to the floor in single-leg stance is achieved more readily with KA than MA, but is dependent on constitutional JLO. A parallel TJLA during this phase of gait is more likely achieved when alignment is individualized to the patient's native anatomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"volume\":\"107-B 4\",\"pages\":\"413-422\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0204.R3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B4.BJJ-2024-0204.R3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:先前对膝关节运动学的研究表明,在单腿站立步态阶段实现与地板平行的胫骨关节线角(TJLA)可以恢复膝关节的运动学并优化全膝关节置换术(TKA)中的隔室压缩负荷。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种手术对准策略最能达到这一目的。因此,本研究试图确定运动学对齐(KA)或机械对齐(MA) tka是否产生更接近平行的TJLA。方法:95例患者随机分为KA组(n = 46)和MA组(n = 49)。根据术前x线片测量体质关节线倾角(JLO);术后x线片测量TJLA。主要终点是KA和MA在单腿站立时TJLA的平均差异。次要结局包括尖端远端和中性JLO膝关节之间的TJLA差异,TJLA在中性约2°范围内的患者比例,以及对齐组之间构象JLO的变化。结果:单腿站立时,平均TJLA更接近于与KA平行(-2.0°(SD 2.6°)),而MA(-4.5°(SD 1.9°));P < 0.001)。在顶端远端JLO患者中观察到类似的平均差异(KA -1.4°(SD 2.1°);Ma -4.9°(sd 1.8°);p < 0.001),但中性JLO (KA -3.7°(SD 2.8°);Ma -3.7°(sd 1.9°);P = 0.776)。更多的患者在与KA平行2°内发生TJLA (n = 24;52.2%)大于MA (n = 4;8.2%;p < 0.001), KA对体质JLO的改变明显较小。结论:单腿站立时,KA比MA更容易实现与地板平行的TJLA,但这取决于体质JLO。在步态的这一阶段,一个平行的TJLA更有可能实现,当对准个性化的病人的原生解剖结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kinematic alignment achieves a tibial joint line angle that is more parallel to the floor in single-leg stance than mechanical alignment : a radiological analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Aims: Previous research on knee kinematics has demonstrated that achieving a tibial joint line angle (TJLA) parallel to the floor in the single-leg stance phase of gait may restore native knee kinematics and optimize compartmental compressive loads in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it is currently unclear which surgical alignment strategy best achieves this. Therefore, this study sought to determine whether kinematically aligned (KA) or mechanically aligned (MA) TKAs produce a TJLA closer to parallel.

Methods: A total of 95 patients were randomized to KA (n = 46) or MA (n = 49). Constitutional joint line obliquity (JLO) was measured from preoperative radiographs; TJLA was measured from postoperative radiographs. The primary outcome was the mean difference in TJLA between KA and MA in single-leg stance. Secondary outcomes included differences in TJLA between apex distal and neutral JLO knees, the proportion of patients with TJLA within approximately 2° of neutral, and changes in constitutional JLO between alignment groups.

Results: In single-leg stance, the mean TJLA was closer to parallel with KA (-2.0° (SD 2.6°)) than MA (-4.5° (SD 1.9°); p < 0.001). Similar mean differences were observed in patients with apex distal JLO (KA -1.4° (SD 2.1°); MA -4.9° (SD 1.8°); p < 0.001) but not neutral JLO (KA -3.7° (SD 2.8°); MA -3.7° (SD 1.9°); p = 0.776). More patients had a TJLA within 2° of parallel with KA (n = 24; 52.2%) than MA (n = 4; 8.2%; p < 0.001), and KA resulted in significantly less change to constitutional JLO.

Conclusion: A TJLA parallel to the floor in single-leg stance is achieved more readily with KA than MA, but is dependent on constitutional JLO. A parallel TJLA during this phase of gait is more likely achieved when alignment is individualized to the patient's native anatomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信