对成人急性肱骨远端不可重建骨折全肘关节置换术和半肘关节置换术后疼痛结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Adam C Watts, Zaid Hamoodi, Andrew C Wright, Catriona M McDaid, Catherine E Hewitt
{"title":"对成人急性肱骨远端不可重建骨折全肘关节置换术和半肘关节置换术后疼痛结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Adam C Watts, Zaid Hamoodi, Andrew C Wright, Catriona M McDaid, Catherine E Hewitt","doi":"10.1177/17585732251328594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unreconstructible distal humerus fractures have been managed with total elbow replacement (TER), but there is increasing use of hemi-replacement (DHH). Pain has been identified as the most important outcome by patients. This study aims to systematically review the literature on reported pain outcomes in adult distal humerus fractures treated with TER or DHH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase and Central were searched using OVID, from January 2000 to September 2023, for studies in adults undergoing DHH or TER for acute closed distal humerus fractures. The primary outcome was patient-rated pain measured on a numerical rating scale. A quantitative summary of reported outcomes was stratified by intervention type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, including one published randomised controlled trial. Meta-analysis found a pooled average NRS pain for TER of 1.7/10 (95% CI: 0.44-2.99) and 1.5/10 for DHH (95% CI: 0.001-3.56). On a 4-point Likert scale the pooled probability of no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain for TER was 0.75, 0.21, 0.02, 0.00 and for DHH was 0.76, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.00.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The available evidence does not enable comparison of pain outcomes between the interventions, which should be assessed in an appropriately powered randomised trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251328594"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review, and meta-analysis of pain outcomes following total elbow replacement and hemi-replacement for unreconstructible acute distal humerus fractures in adults.\",\"authors\":\"Adam C Watts, Zaid Hamoodi, Andrew C Wright, Catriona M McDaid, Catherine E Hewitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732251328594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unreconstructible distal humerus fractures have been managed with total elbow replacement (TER), but there is increasing use of hemi-replacement (DHH). Pain has been identified as the most important outcome by patients. This study aims to systematically review the literature on reported pain outcomes in adult distal humerus fractures treated with TER or DHH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline, Embase and Central were searched using OVID, from January 2000 to September 2023, for studies in adults undergoing DHH or TER for acute closed distal humerus fractures. The primary outcome was patient-rated pain measured on a numerical rating scale. A quantitative summary of reported outcomes was stratified by intervention type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, including one published randomised controlled trial. Meta-analysis found a pooled average NRS pain for TER of 1.7/10 (95% CI: 0.44-2.99) and 1.5/10 for DHH (95% CI: 0.001-3.56). On a 4-point Likert scale the pooled probability of no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain for TER was 0.75, 0.21, 0.02, 0.00 and for DHH was 0.76, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.00.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The available evidence does not enable comparison of pain outcomes between the interventions, which should be assessed in an appropriately powered randomised trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732251328594\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11948238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251328594\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251328594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无法重建的肱骨远端骨折已采用全肘关节置换术(TER)治疗,但半置换术(DHH)的使用越来越多。疼痛已被确定为患者最重要的结果。本研究旨在系统地回顾文献报道的成人肱骨远端骨折经TER或DHH治疗后疼痛的结果。方法:从2000年1月至2023年9月,通过OVID检索Medline、Embase和Central,检索成人急性闭合性肱骨远端骨折行DHH或TER治疗的研究。主要结果是用数字评定量表测量患者对疼痛的评分。对报告结果的定量总结按干预类型分层。结果:23项研究符合纳入标准,包括1项已发表的随机对照试验。荟萃分析发现,TER患者的平均NRS疼痛为1.7/10 (95% CI: 0.44-2.99), DHH患者的平均NRS疼痛为1.5/10 (95% CI: 0.001-3.56)。在4点李克特量表上,TER患者无疼痛、轻度疼痛、中度疼痛和重度疼痛的总概率分别为0.75、0.21、0.02、0.00,DHH患者无疼痛、轻度疼痛、中度疼痛和重度疼痛的总概率分别为0.76、0.11、0.12和0.00。讨论:现有的证据不能比较干预措施之间的疼痛结果,这应该在适当的随机试验中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review, and meta-analysis of pain outcomes following total elbow replacement and hemi-replacement for unreconstructible acute distal humerus fractures in adults.

Background: Unreconstructible distal humerus fractures have been managed with total elbow replacement (TER), but there is increasing use of hemi-replacement (DHH). Pain has been identified as the most important outcome by patients. This study aims to systematically review the literature on reported pain outcomes in adult distal humerus fractures treated with TER or DHH.

Methods: Medline, Embase and Central were searched using OVID, from January 2000 to September 2023, for studies in adults undergoing DHH or TER for acute closed distal humerus fractures. The primary outcome was patient-rated pain measured on a numerical rating scale. A quantitative summary of reported outcomes was stratified by intervention type.

Results: Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria, including one published randomised controlled trial. Meta-analysis found a pooled average NRS pain for TER of 1.7/10 (95% CI: 0.44-2.99) and 1.5/10 for DHH (95% CI: 0.001-3.56). On a 4-point Likert scale the pooled probability of no pain, mild pain, moderate pain, severe pain for TER was 0.75, 0.21, 0.02, 0.00 and for DHH was 0.76, 0.11, 0.12, and 0.00.

Discussion: The available evidence does not enable comparison of pain outcomes between the interventions, which should be assessed in an appropriately powered randomised trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信