Roderick P Venekamp, Ben Ainsworth, Tammy Thomas, Beth Stuart, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Fiona Mowbray, Christopher C Butler, Nick Francis, Samantha Richards-Hall, Anthony Harnden, Alastair D Hay, Claire Hopkins, Michael Moore, Lucy Yardley, Theo Jm Verheij, Shihua Zhu, Paul Little
{"title":"盐水鼻冲洗治疗急性鼻窦炎(SNIFS II):一项随机对照试验,嵌套过程评估。","authors":"Roderick P Venekamp, Ben Ainsworth, Tammy Thomas, Beth Stuart, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Fiona Mowbray, Christopher C Butler, Nick Francis, Samantha Richards-Hall, Anthony Harnden, Alastair D Hay, Claire Hopkins, Michael Moore, Lucy Yardley, Theo Jm Verheij, Shihua Zhu, Paul Little","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite having marginal beneficial effects, antibiotics are routinely prescribed in adults with acute sinusitis. Alternative interventions for this common condition are urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation in 24 English general practices between October 2019 and May 2021.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were randomised to advice to high-volume hypertonic saline nasal irrigation with a delayed antibiotic prescription or usual care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, adherence, and acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those invited, <i>n</i> = 81/107 (76%) consented and were randomised (42 intervention, 39 usual care). Two participants were excluded owing to ineligibility. Antibiotic prescribing strategies were recorded at baseline for <i>n</i> = 79/79 (100%), with no or delayed antibiotics prescribed in 60% (<i>n</i> = 24/40) of the saline group versus 38% (<i>n</i> = 15/39) of the usual care group. At follow-up, 80% (<i>n</i> = 63/79) of participants recorded whether they consumed antibiotics or not. Among those from the intervention group who returned a symptom diary, 96% (<i>n</i> = 22/23) and 65% (<i>n</i> = 15/23) reported using saline nasal irrigation during the first and second week, respectively. Semi-structured interviews with 16 participants revealed that most were positive about trial participation and viewed saline nasal irrigation as acceptable, noting it as an alternative to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saline nasal irrigation is deemed acceptable for adults with acute sinusitis and a trial of such intervention is feasible. A large trial is warranted to assess the effectiveness of this intervention for this common condition.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis (SNIFS II): a randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Roderick P Venekamp, Ben Ainsworth, Tammy Thomas, Beth Stuart, Joanna Slodkowska-Barabasz, Fiona Mowbray, Christopher C Butler, Nick Francis, Samantha Richards-Hall, Anthony Harnden, Alastair D Hay, Claire Hopkins, Michael Moore, Lucy Yardley, Theo Jm Verheij, Shihua Zhu, Paul Little\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite having marginal beneficial effects, antibiotics are routinely prescribed in adults with acute sinusitis. Alternative interventions for this common condition are urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the feasibility and acceptability of saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation in 24 English general practices between October 2019 and May 2021.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants were randomised to advice to high-volume hypertonic saline nasal irrigation with a delayed antibiotic prescription or usual care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, adherence, and acceptability of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of those invited, <i>n</i> = 81/107 (76%) consented and were randomised (42 intervention, 39 usual care). Two participants were excluded owing to ineligibility. Antibiotic prescribing strategies were recorded at baseline for <i>n</i> = 79/79 (100%), with no or delayed antibiotics prescribed in 60% (<i>n</i> = 24/40) of the saline group versus 38% (<i>n</i> = 15/39) of the usual care group. At follow-up, 80% (<i>n</i> = 63/79) of participants recorded whether they consumed antibiotics or not. Among those from the intervention group who returned a symptom diary, 96% (<i>n</i> = 22/23) and 65% (<i>n</i> = 15/23) reported using saline nasal irrigation during the first and second week, respectively. Semi-structured interviews with 16 participants revealed that most were positive about trial participation and viewed saline nasal irrigation as acceptable, noting it as an alternative to antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Saline nasal irrigation is deemed acceptable for adults with acute sinusitis and a trial of such intervention is feasible. A large trial is warranted to assess the effectiveness of this intervention for this common condition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis (SNIFS II): a randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation.
Background: Despite having marginal beneficial effects, antibiotics are routinely prescribed in adults with acute sinusitis. Alternative interventions for this common condition are urgently needed.
Aim: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of saline nasal irrigation for acute sinusitis.
Design & setting: Randomised controlled pilot trial with nested process evaluation in 24 English general practices between October 2019 and May 2021.
Method: Participants were randomised to advice to high-volume hypertonic saline nasal irrigation with a delayed antibiotic prescription or usual care. Feasibility outcomes included recruitment and follow-up rates, adherence, and acceptability of the intervention.
Results: Of those invited, n = 81/107 (76%) consented and were randomised (42 intervention, 39 usual care). Two participants were excluded owing to ineligibility. Antibiotic prescribing strategies were recorded at baseline for n = 79/79 (100%), with no or delayed antibiotics prescribed in 60% (n = 24/40) of the saline group versus 38% (n = 15/39) of the usual care group. At follow-up, 80% (n = 63/79) of participants recorded whether they consumed antibiotics or not. Among those from the intervention group who returned a symptom diary, 96% (n = 22/23) and 65% (n = 15/23) reported using saline nasal irrigation during the first and second week, respectively. Semi-structured interviews with 16 participants revealed that most were positive about trial participation and viewed saline nasal irrigation as acceptable, noting it as an alternative to antibiotics.
Conclusion: Saline nasal irrigation is deemed acceptable for adults with acute sinusitis and a trial of such intervention is feasible. A large trial is warranted to assess the effectiveness of this intervention for this common condition.