护理人员i-gel®在院前气道管理中的放置和使用感知。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kelsey Wilhelm, Jake Toy, Jonathan Warren, Ryan DeVivo, Dipesh Patel, Denise Whitfield, Saman Kashani, Nancy Alvarez, Jennifer Nulty, Adrienne Roel, Jenny Van Slyke, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Nichole Bosson
{"title":"护理人员i-gel®在院前气道管理中的放置和使用感知。","authors":"Kelsey Wilhelm, Jake Toy, Jonathan Warren, Ryan DeVivo, Dipesh Patel, Denise Whitfield, Saman Kashani, Nancy Alvarez, Jennifer Nulty, Adrienne Roel, Jenny Van Slyke, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Nichole Bosson","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2479562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Use of supraglottic airways by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians has increased for patients of all ages. However, data are limited on real-world use in the prehospital setting, including success rates, complications, and paramedic experience. The objective of this study was to determine frequency of successful i-gel<sup>®</sup> insertion and associated complications, and to describe paramedic perception of i-gel<sup>®</sup> use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of i-gel<sup>®</sup> use in adult patients at four fire-based EMS Provider Agencies in Los Angeles (LA) County from June to September 2021. All paramedics received asynchronous and hands-on training prior to implementation. The i-gel<sup>®</sup> was indicated for adult patients in respiratory and/or cardiac arrest of any etiology, as directed by LA County protocols. Patients were included if a paramedic attempted i-gel<sup>®</sup> placement at any point. After transition of care, paramedics completed a web-based questionnaire and contacted an on-call EMS physician investigator to discuss the case. Further data were abstracted from the EMS electronic patient care record. The primary outcome was successful placement of i-gel<sup>®</sup> based on adequate ventilation post insertion confirmed with capnography. Secondary outcomes were frequency of complications and paramedic perceived ease of placement and of ventilation with i-gel<sup>®</sup> measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 102 adult patients, 55 (54%) were female and the median age was 69 years (IQR 53-79). The majority 91 (89%) of the patients had a paramedic impression of non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Placement was successful in 90 (88%) patients overall with 85 (83%) i-gel<sup>®</sup> insertions successful on the first attempt. Complications included: 28 (28%) cases with regurgitation/emesis, bleeding (8, 8%), hypoxia (7, 7%), and dislodgement (5, 5%). Among cases of successful i-gel<sup>®</sup> placement, the majority of paramedics rated both ease of placement and ease of ventilation as \"very easy\" (69% and 78%, respectively) or \"somewhat easy\" (23% and 9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paramedics were successful in 88% of i-gel<sup>®</sup> insertion attempts with the most common complication being regurgitation/emesis. Paramedics rated the ease of placement and ease of ventilation of the i-gel<sup>®</sup> device as \"very easy\" or \"somewhat easy\" in the vast majority of cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paramedic i-gel<sup>®</sup> Placement and Perception of Use in Prehospital Airway Management.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey Wilhelm, Jake Toy, Jonathan Warren, Ryan DeVivo, Dipesh Patel, Denise Whitfield, Saman Kashani, Nancy Alvarez, Jennifer Nulty, Adrienne Roel, Jenny Van Slyke, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Nichole Bosson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2479562\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Use of supraglottic airways by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians has increased for patients of all ages. However, data are limited on real-world use in the prehospital setting, including success rates, complications, and paramedic experience. The objective of this study was to determine frequency of successful i-gel<sup>®</sup> insertion and associated complications, and to describe paramedic perception of i-gel<sup>®</sup> use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of i-gel<sup>®</sup> use in adult patients at four fire-based EMS Provider Agencies in Los Angeles (LA) County from June to September 2021. All paramedics received asynchronous and hands-on training prior to implementation. The i-gel<sup>®</sup> was indicated for adult patients in respiratory and/or cardiac arrest of any etiology, as directed by LA County protocols. Patients were included if a paramedic attempted i-gel<sup>®</sup> placement at any point. After transition of care, paramedics completed a web-based questionnaire and contacted an on-call EMS physician investigator to discuss the case. Further data were abstracted from the EMS electronic patient care record. The primary outcome was successful placement of i-gel<sup>®</sup> based on adequate ventilation post insertion confirmed with capnography. Secondary outcomes were frequency of complications and paramedic perceived ease of placement and of ventilation with i-gel<sup>®</sup> measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 102 adult patients, 55 (54%) were female and the median age was 69 years (IQR 53-79). The majority 91 (89%) of the patients had a paramedic impression of non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Placement was successful in 90 (88%) patients overall with 85 (83%) i-gel<sup>®</sup> insertions successful on the first attempt. Complications included: 28 (28%) cases with regurgitation/emesis, bleeding (8, 8%), hypoxia (7, 7%), and dislodgement (5, 5%). Among cases of successful i-gel<sup>®</sup> placement, the majority of paramedics rated both ease of placement and ease of ventilation as \\\"very easy\\\" (69% and 78%, respectively) or \\\"somewhat easy\\\" (23% and 9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Paramedics were successful in 88% of i-gel<sup>®</sup> insertion attempts with the most common complication being regurgitation/emesis. Paramedics rated the ease of placement and ease of ventilation of the i-gel<sup>®</sup> device as \\\"very easy\\\" or \\\"somewhat easy\\\" in the vast majority of cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2479562\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2479562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:急诊医疗服务(EMS)临床医生对声门上气道的使用在所有年龄段的患者中都有所增加。然而,在院前环境中实际使用的数据有限,包括成功率、并发症和护理人员经验。本研究的目的是确定i-gel®成功插入的频率和相关并发症,并描述护理人员对i-gel®使用的看法。方法:这是一项2021年6月至9月在洛杉矶(LA)县四家消防EMS供应商机构对成人患者使用i-gel®的前瞻性研究。在实施之前,所有护理人员都接受了异步和实践培训。i-gel®适用于任何病因的呼吸和/或心脏骤停的成年患者,按照LA县协议的指导。如果护理人员在任何时候尝试放置i-gel®,则纳入患者。在护理转移后,护理人员完成了一份基于网络的问卷调查,并联系了一名随叫随到的EMS医师调查员来讨论该病例。进一步的数据从EMS电子患者护理记录中提取。主要结果是i-gel®的成功放置,基于充分的通气后插入,并经血管造影证实。次要结局是并发症的发生频率和护理人员对i-gel®放置和通气的容易程度的感知,以5分李克特量表测量。进行描述性统计。结果:102例成人患者中,女性55例(54%),中位年龄69岁(IQR 53 ~ 79)。大多数91例(89%)患者有非创伤性心脏骤停的护理印象。总体而言,90例(88%)患者植入成功,85例(83%)i-gel®首次植入成功。并发症包括:28例(28%)反流/呕吐,出血(8.8%),缺氧(7.7%)和脱位(5.5%)。在成功放置i-gel®的病例中,大多数护理人员将放置和通气的易用性评为“非常容易”(分别为69%和78%)或“比较容易”(23%和9%)。结论:护理人员成功的i-gel®插入尝试88%,最常见的并发症是反流/呕吐。在绝大多数情况下,护理人员将i-gel®装置的易于放置和易于通气评为“非常容易”或“有些容易”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paramedic i-gel® Placement and Perception of Use in Prehospital Airway Management.

Objectives: Use of supraglottic airways by emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians has increased for patients of all ages. However, data are limited on real-world use in the prehospital setting, including success rates, complications, and paramedic experience. The objective of this study was to determine frequency of successful i-gel® insertion and associated complications, and to describe paramedic perception of i-gel® use.

Methods: This was a prospective study of i-gel® use in adult patients at four fire-based EMS Provider Agencies in Los Angeles (LA) County from June to September 2021. All paramedics received asynchronous and hands-on training prior to implementation. The i-gel® was indicated for adult patients in respiratory and/or cardiac arrest of any etiology, as directed by LA County protocols. Patients were included if a paramedic attempted i-gel® placement at any point. After transition of care, paramedics completed a web-based questionnaire and contacted an on-call EMS physician investigator to discuss the case. Further data were abstracted from the EMS electronic patient care record. The primary outcome was successful placement of i-gel® based on adequate ventilation post insertion confirmed with capnography. Secondary outcomes were frequency of complications and paramedic perceived ease of placement and of ventilation with i-gel® measured on a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were reported.

Results: Of the 102 adult patients, 55 (54%) were female and the median age was 69 years (IQR 53-79). The majority 91 (89%) of the patients had a paramedic impression of non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Placement was successful in 90 (88%) patients overall with 85 (83%) i-gel® insertions successful on the first attempt. Complications included: 28 (28%) cases with regurgitation/emesis, bleeding (8, 8%), hypoxia (7, 7%), and dislodgement (5, 5%). Among cases of successful i-gel® placement, the majority of paramedics rated both ease of placement and ease of ventilation as "very easy" (69% and 78%, respectively) or "somewhat easy" (23% and 9%).

Conclusions: Paramedics were successful in 88% of i-gel® insertion attempts with the most common complication being regurgitation/emesis. Paramedics rated the ease of placement and ease of ventilation of the i-gel® device as "very easy" or "somewhat easy" in the vast majority of cases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信