老年糖尿病患者脂蛋白(a)与冠状动脉钙化之间的关系:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-20 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM26114
Lijun Qiu, Hongwei Qiao
{"title":"老年糖尿病患者脂蛋白(a)与冠状动脉钙化之间的关系:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Lijun Qiu, Hongwei Qiao","doi":"10.31083/RCM26114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with the development of coronary artery calcification (CAC), yet its exact function is not fully understood. This study sought to assess the relationship between Lp(a) levels and the risk of CAC in elderly diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 486 elderly diabetic patients. The exposure factor was Lp(a) levels, categorized into three groups (T1, T2, T3). The outcome was the presence of CAC. The relationship between Lp(a) levels and CAC was evaluated using several statistical methods, including univariate and multivariate logistic regression, multivariable stratified analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest Lp(a) group (T3) showed significantly higher prevalence of CAC compared to the T1 and T2 groups. Univariate logistic regression indicated a significant link between Lp(a) and CAC. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression supported the finding that elevated Lp(a) levels correlated with a heightened risk of CAC in all models. Specifically, each unit rise in Lp(a) was associated with a notable increase in CAC risk, and Log<sub>10</sub>Lp(a) and each 1 standard deviation increase in Lp(a) also significantly elevated CAC risk. Multivariable stratified analysis demonstrated significant differences in CAC risk across various subgroups, including age ≤70 years, males, females, smokers, hypertensive, non-hypertensive, hyperlipidemic, non-hyperlipidemic, non-stroke, and non-chronic kidney disease patients. ROC curve analysis showed that adding Lp(a) to the baseline model improved the area under the curve from 0.741 to 0.755. RCS analysis indicated a significant, approximately linear association between Log<sub>10</sub>Lp(a) and CAC risk (<i>p</i> nonlinear = 0.115).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an elderly diabetic population, elevated levels of Lp(a) were strongly linked to a greater risk of CAC. Integrating Lp(a) measurements with conventional risk factors improves the predictive accuracy for CAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"26114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association between Lipoprotein(a) and Coronary Artery Calcification in Elderly Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lijun Qiu, Hongwei Qiao\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM26114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with the development of coronary artery calcification (CAC), yet its exact function is not fully understood. This study sought to assess the relationship between Lp(a) levels and the risk of CAC in elderly diabetic patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 486 elderly diabetic patients. The exposure factor was Lp(a) levels, categorized into three groups (T1, T2, T3). The outcome was the presence of CAC. The relationship between Lp(a) levels and CAC was evaluated using several statistical methods, including univariate and multivariate logistic regression, multivariable stratified analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The highest Lp(a) group (T3) showed significantly higher prevalence of CAC compared to the T1 and T2 groups. Univariate logistic regression indicated a significant link between Lp(a) and CAC. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression supported the finding that elevated Lp(a) levels correlated with a heightened risk of CAC in all models. Specifically, each unit rise in Lp(a) was associated with a notable increase in CAC risk, and Log<sub>10</sub>Lp(a) and each 1 standard deviation increase in Lp(a) also significantly elevated CAC risk. Multivariable stratified analysis demonstrated significant differences in CAC risk across various subgroups, including age ≤70 years, males, females, smokers, hypertensive, non-hypertensive, hyperlipidemic, non-hyperlipidemic, non-stroke, and non-chronic kidney disease patients. ROC curve analysis showed that adding Lp(a) to the baseline model improved the area under the curve from 0.741 to 0.755. RCS analysis indicated a significant, approximately linear association between Log<sub>10</sub>Lp(a) and CAC risk (<i>p</i> nonlinear = 0.115).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In an elderly diabetic population, elevated levels of Lp(a) were strongly linked to a greater risk of CAC. Integrating Lp(a) measurements with conventional risk factors improves the predictive accuracy for CAC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"26114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951277/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26114\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM26114","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]与冠状动脉钙化(CAC)的发展有关,但其确切功能尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在评估老年糖尿病患者Lp(a)水平与CAC风险之间的关系。方法:对486例老年糖尿病患者进行横断面研究。暴露因子为Lp(a)水平,分为T1、T2、T3三组。结果是CAC的出现。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归、多变量分层分析、受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和限制性三次样条(RCS)分析等统计方法评价Lp(a)水平与CAC之间的关系。结果:最高Lp(a)组(T3) CAC患病率明显高于T1和T2组。单因素logistic回归表明Lp(a)与CAC之间存在显著相关性。此外,多变量逻辑回归支持所有模型中Lp(a)水平升高与CAC风险升高相关的发现。具体而言,Lp(a)每增加一个单位与CAC风险显著增加相关,Log10Lp(a)和Lp(a)每增加1个标准差也显著增加CAC风险。多变量分层分析显示,不同亚组(包括年龄≤70岁、男性、女性、吸烟者、高血压、非高血压、高脂血症、非高脂血症、非卒中和非慢性肾病患者)的CAC风险存在显著差异。ROC曲线分析表明,在基线模型中加入Lp(a)后,曲线下面积由0.741提高到0.755。RCS分析显示,Log10Lp(a)与CAC风险之间存在显著的近似线性关联(p非线性= 0.115)。结论:在老年糖尿病人群中,Lp(a)水平升高与CAC的高风险密切相关。将Lp(a)测量值与常规风险因素相结合可以提高CAC的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association between Lipoprotein(a) and Coronary Artery Calcification in Elderly Patients with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with the development of coronary artery calcification (CAC), yet its exact function is not fully understood. This study sought to assess the relationship between Lp(a) levels and the risk of CAC in elderly diabetic patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 486 elderly diabetic patients. The exposure factor was Lp(a) levels, categorized into three groups (T1, T2, T3). The outcome was the presence of CAC. The relationship between Lp(a) levels and CAC was evaluated using several statistical methods, including univariate and multivariate logistic regression, multivariable stratified analysis, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis.

Results: The highest Lp(a) group (T3) showed significantly higher prevalence of CAC compared to the T1 and T2 groups. Univariate logistic regression indicated a significant link between Lp(a) and CAC. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression supported the finding that elevated Lp(a) levels correlated with a heightened risk of CAC in all models. Specifically, each unit rise in Lp(a) was associated with a notable increase in CAC risk, and Log10Lp(a) and each 1 standard deviation increase in Lp(a) also significantly elevated CAC risk. Multivariable stratified analysis demonstrated significant differences in CAC risk across various subgroups, including age ≤70 years, males, females, smokers, hypertensive, non-hypertensive, hyperlipidemic, non-hyperlipidemic, non-stroke, and non-chronic kidney disease patients. ROC curve analysis showed that adding Lp(a) to the baseline model improved the area under the curve from 0.741 to 0.755. RCS analysis indicated a significant, approximately linear association between Log10Lp(a) and CAC risk (p nonlinear = 0.115).

Conclusions: In an elderly diabetic population, elevated levels of Lp(a) were strongly linked to a greater risk of CAC. Integrating Lp(a) measurements with conventional risk factors improves the predictive accuracy for CAC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信