多中心临床试验中离群相关系数的检测。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lieven Desmet, David Venet, Laura Trotta, Tomasz Burzykowski, Marc Buyse
{"title":"多中心临床试验中离群相关系数的检测。","authors":"Lieven Desmet, David Venet, Laura Trotta, Tomasz Burzykowski, Marc Buyse","doi":"10.1002/pst.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central statistical monitoring aims at finding centers whose data distribution differs significantly from the other centers in multicentric clinical trials. Such differences may point to data quality issues due to negligence, misconduct, or fraud. Data distributions can be compared across centers in many different ways, depending on the type of data (e.g., numerical or categorical), whether a univariate or a multivariate comparison is performed, and so on. In that framework, we present two methods aimed at detecting centers with outlying bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients. One of the methods directly compares the correlations across centers. The other method conditions the test on one of the marginal standard deviations, which makes the test on correlation independent of the centers' standard deviations. Both methods are shown to perform equally well on simulated data. They are also applied on real world data, where they identify centers with outlying correlations. The findings of the two tests are compared, showing that they concord for centers with average standard deviations, but differ for centers with extreme standard deviations. While the focus here is on central statistical monitoring, the methods are general and can be used in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19934,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","volume":"24 3","pages":"e70013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of Outlying Correlation Coefficients in Multicenter Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Lieven Desmet, David Venet, Laura Trotta, Tomasz Burzykowski, Marc Buyse\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pst.70013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Central statistical monitoring aims at finding centers whose data distribution differs significantly from the other centers in multicentric clinical trials. Such differences may point to data quality issues due to negligence, misconduct, or fraud. Data distributions can be compared across centers in many different ways, depending on the type of data (e.g., numerical or categorical), whether a univariate or a multivariate comparison is performed, and so on. In that framework, we present two methods aimed at detecting centers with outlying bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients. One of the methods directly compares the correlations across centers. The other method conditions the test on one of the marginal standard deviations, which makes the test on correlation independent of the centers' standard deviations. Both methods are shown to perform equally well on simulated data. They are also applied on real world data, where they identify centers with outlying correlations. The findings of the two tests are compared, showing that they concord for centers with average standard deviations, but differ for centers with extreme standard deviations. While the focus here is on central statistical monitoring, the methods are general and can be used in other settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"e70013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmaceutical Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中心统计监测的目的是在多中心临床试验中发现数据分布与其他中心有显著差异的中心。这种差异可能指向由于疏忽、不当行为或欺诈而导致的数据质量问题。根据数据类型(例如,数值或分类)、执行单变量比较还是多变量比较,可以用许多不同的方式跨中心比较数据分布,等等。在该框架中,我们提出了两种方法,旨在检测具有离群双变量Pearson相关系数的中心。其中一种方法直接比较各中心之间的相关性。另一种方法将检验条件限定在一个边际标准差上,使相关性检验与中心标准差无关。两种方法在模拟数据上的表现都很好。它们也被应用于现实世界的数据,在那里它们用离群相关性来识别中心。两个测试的结果进行了比较,表明它们与平均标准差的中心一致,但与极端标准差的中心不同。虽然这里的重点是中央统计监测,但这些方法是通用的,可以用于其他设置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of Outlying Correlation Coefficients in Multicenter Clinical Trials.

Central statistical monitoring aims at finding centers whose data distribution differs significantly from the other centers in multicentric clinical trials. Such differences may point to data quality issues due to negligence, misconduct, or fraud. Data distributions can be compared across centers in many different ways, depending on the type of data (e.g., numerical or categorical), whether a univariate or a multivariate comparison is performed, and so on. In that framework, we present two methods aimed at detecting centers with outlying bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients. One of the methods directly compares the correlations across centers. The other method conditions the test on one of the marginal standard deviations, which makes the test on correlation independent of the centers' standard deviations. Both methods are shown to perform equally well on simulated data. They are also applied on real world data, where they identify centers with outlying correlations. The findings of the two tests are compared, showing that they concord for centers with average standard deviations, but differ for centers with extreme standard deviations. While the focus here is on central statistical monitoring, the methods are general and can be used in other settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Statistics
Pharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Statistics is an industry-led initiative, tackling real problems in statistical applications. The Journal publishes papers that share experiences in the practical application of statistics within the pharmaceutical industry. It covers all aspects of pharmaceutical statistical applications from discovery, through pre-clinical development, clinical development, post-marketing surveillance, consumer health, production, epidemiology, and health economics. The Journal is both international and multidisciplinary. It includes high quality practical papers, case studies and review papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信