CatLet©血管造影评分系统对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天心脏死亡率的预测价值。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-17 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM28198
Chenjie Zhang, Wenhui Liang, Zongliang Yu, Yongming He
{"title":"CatLet©血管造影评分系统对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后30天心脏死亡率的预测价值。","authors":"Chenjie Zhang, Wenhui Liang, Zongliang Yu, Yongming He","doi":"10.31083/RCM28198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet©) angiographic scoring system is a newly developed tool to predict the long-term clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of this novel angiographic scoring system for cardiac mortality in AMI patients within 30 days of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in AMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AMI undergoing pPCI were consecutively enrolled between January 2012 and July 2013. The CatLet© score was calculated for all the lesions in the non-occlusive status and were tertile partitioned into three groups: CatLet-low ≤14 (N = 124), CatLet-mid 14-22 (N = 82), and CatLet-top ≥22 (N = 102). The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality at 30 days after the procedure. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival rates among the CatLet© score tertiles were compared using the Log-rank test. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the associations between the predictors and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 308 patients were included in the final analysis. The included patients were followed up for 30 days, with 19 (6.17%) cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the CatLet-top tertile exhibited a significant increase in the risk of cardiac mortality when compared with the low and mid tertiles (<i>p</i> for trend <0.01); the CatLet© score remained an independent predictor of 30-day cardiac mortality in AMI patients after adjusting for clinical variables (HR (95% CI): 6.13 (1.29-29.17); <i>p</i> < 0.01). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that a per 1 unit increase in CatLet© score was associated with a 1.04 (1.01-1.06)-fold increased risk of cardiac death. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) statistic for the CatLet© score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.91), with a good calibration (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.92; <i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CatLet© score can be used to predict the short-term cardiac death in AMI patients. A CatLet© score ≥22 or ≥11 myocardial segments involved relative to the total 17 segments (the score divided by 2), including culprit or non-culprit vessels, accounting for 65% (11/17) of left ventricle mass involved, is significantly associated with poor prognosis. The current study has extended the application of the CatLet© score in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR-POC-17013536. Registered 25 November, 2017, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=22814.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"28198"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Values of the CatLet© Angiographic Scoring System for 30-Day Cardiac Mortality in Patients after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.\",\"authors\":\"Chenjie Zhang, Wenhui Liang, Zongliang Yu, Yongming He\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM28198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet©) angiographic scoring system is a newly developed tool to predict the long-term clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of this novel angiographic scoring system for cardiac mortality in AMI patients within 30 days of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in AMI patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with AMI undergoing pPCI were consecutively enrolled between January 2012 and July 2013. The CatLet© score was calculated for all the lesions in the non-occlusive status and were tertile partitioned into three groups: CatLet-low ≤14 (N = 124), CatLet-mid 14-22 (N = 82), and CatLet-top ≥22 (N = 102). The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality at 30 days after the procedure. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival rates among the CatLet© score tertiles were compared using the Log-rank test. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the associations between the predictors and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 308 patients were included in the final analysis. The included patients were followed up for 30 days, with 19 (6.17%) cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the CatLet-top tertile exhibited a significant increase in the risk of cardiac mortality when compared with the low and mid tertiles (<i>p</i> for trend <0.01); the CatLet© score remained an independent predictor of 30-day cardiac mortality in AMI patients after adjusting for clinical variables (HR (95% CI): 6.13 (1.29-29.17); <i>p</i> < 0.01). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that a per 1 unit increase in CatLet© score was associated with a 1.04 (1.01-1.06)-fold increased risk of cardiac death. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) statistic for the CatLet© score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.91), with a good calibration (χ<sup>2</sup> = 12.92; <i>p</i> = 0.12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CatLet© score can be used to predict the short-term cardiac death in AMI patients. A CatLet© score ≥22 or ≥11 myocardial segments involved relative to the total 17 segments (the score divided by 2), including culprit or non-culprit vessels, accounting for 65% (11/17) of left ventricle mass involved, is significantly associated with poor prognosis. The current study has extended the application of the CatLet© score in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ChiCTR-POC-17013536. Registered 25 November, 2017, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=22814.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"28198\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11951280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM28198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM28198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉树描述和病变评估(CatLet©)血管造影评分系统是一种新开发的工具,用于预测急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的长期临床预后。本研究旨在评估这种新型血管造影评分系统对AMI患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI)后30天内心脏死亡率的预测价值。方法:2012年1月至2013年7月连续入组AMI患者行pPCI。对所有处于非闭塞状态的病变计算CatLet©评分,并将其分为CatLet-low≤14 (N = 124)、CatLet-mid 14-22 (N = 82)、CatLet-top≥22 (N = 102)三组。主要终点是手术后30天的心脏死亡率。采用Kaplan-Meier法生成生存曲线,采用Log-rank检验比较CatLet©评分分位数的存活率。此外,进行Cox回归分析以确定预测因素与临床结果之间的关联。结果:308例患者纳入最终分析。随访30 d,心源性死亡19例(6.17%)。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,与低、中三分位数相比,CatLet-top三分位数的心脏死亡风险显著增加(p < 0.01)。多变量分析表明,CatLet©评分每增加1个单位,心源性死亡风险增加1.04(1.01-1.06)倍。CatLet©评分的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)统计量为0.80 (95% CI, 0.69 ~ 0.91),具有良好的校准性(χ2 = 12.92;P = 0.12)。结论:CatLet©评分可用于预测AMI患者的短期心源性死亡。CatLet©评分≥22或≥11个心肌节段相对于总17个节段(评分除以2)受累,包括罪魁祸首或非罪魁祸首血管,占受累左心室肿块的65%(11/17),与预后不良显著相关。本研究扩展了CatLet©评分在临床实践中的应用。临床试验注册:ChiCTR-POC-17013536。2017年11月25日注册,https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=22814。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive Values of the CatLet© Angiographic Scoring System for 30-Day Cardiac Mortality in Patients after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Background: The Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet©) angiographic scoring system is a newly developed tool to predict the long-term clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of this novel angiographic scoring system for cardiac mortality in AMI patients within 30 days of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in AMI patients.

Methods: Patients with AMI undergoing pPCI were consecutively enrolled between January 2012 and July 2013. The CatLet© score was calculated for all the lesions in the non-occlusive status and were tertile partitioned into three groups: CatLet-low ≤14 (N = 124), CatLet-mid 14-22 (N = 82), and CatLet-top ≥22 (N = 102). The primary endpoint was cardiac mortality at 30 days after the procedure. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival rates among the CatLet© score tertiles were compared using the Log-rank test. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the associations between the predictors and clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 308 patients were included in the final analysis. The included patients were followed up for 30 days, with 19 (6.17%) cardiac death. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated that the CatLet-top tertile exhibited a significant increase in the risk of cardiac mortality when compared with the low and mid tertiles (p for trend <0.01); the CatLet© score remained an independent predictor of 30-day cardiac mortality in AMI patients after adjusting for clinical variables (HR (95% CI): 6.13 (1.29-29.17); p < 0.01). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that a per 1 unit increase in CatLet© score was associated with a 1.04 (1.01-1.06)-fold increased risk of cardiac death. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) statistic for the CatLet© score was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.91), with a good calibration (χ2 = 12.92; p = 0.12).

Conclusion: The CatLet© score can be used to predict the short-term cardiac death in AMI patients. A CatLet© score ≥22 or ≥11 myocardial segments involved relative to the total 17 segments (the score divided by 2), including culprit or non-culprit vessels, accounting for 65% (11/17) of left ventricle mass involved, is significantly associated with poor prognosis. The current study has extended the application of the CatLet© score in clinical practice.

Clinical trial registration: ChiCTR-POC-17013536. Registered 25 November, 2017, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=22814.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信