宫腔镜引导下子宫内膜取样诊断子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的效果。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tarek Khalife, Selim Afsar, Amy L Brien, Aakriti R Carrubba, Megan P Griffith, Katie Casper, Kristina A Butler, Sarah L Cohen Rassier
{"title":"宫腔镜引导下子宫内膜取样诊断子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的效果。","authors":"Tarek Khalife, Selim Afsar, Amy L Brien, Aakriti R Carrubba, Megan P Griffith, Katie Casper, Kristina A Butler, Sarah L Cohen Rassier","doi":"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of hysteroscopy-guided versus blind sampling in detecting concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to identify factors associated with missing cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Integrated academic and community healthcare system in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This included 151 patients diagnosed with EIN during endometrial sampling who underwent a hysterectomy within 3 months. Patients with concurrent cancer diagnoses were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients diagnosed with EIN using hysteroscopy-directed biopsy were compared to those diagnosed with blind-sampling methods using the pathology results of the subsequent hysterectomy specimen as the gold standard comparator to analyze rates of missed endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was a reduced risk of unanticipated concurrent EC on the final hysterectomy pathology result for patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia via a hysteroscopy-directed biopsy (odds ratios [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.20-0.95, p = .033). In multivariate analysis, body mass index ≥30 and patient age >60 were associated with an elevated risk of EC on final pathology (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.51-11.51, p = .004; OR = 5.56, 95% CI = 1.22-35.21, p < .001), respectively, and diabetes mellitus was the only independent variable associated with a higher risk of EIN on final hysterectomy pathology (OR = 7.01, 95% CI = 1.40-35.04, p = .018). Age, body mass index, and endometrial thickness on pre-biopsy ultrasound were not associated with an increased risk of overlooking concurrent endometrial carcinoma on final hysterectomy pathology on univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysteroscopy-directed biopsy may reduce the risk of missing a concurrent endometrial malignancy during endometrial sampling in women with EIN. The results affirm the superior diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy-directed endometrial evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hysteroscopy-Guided Endometrial Sampling Diagnostic Performance in Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Tarek Khalife, Selim Afsar, Amy L Brien, Aakriti R Carrubba, Megan P Griffith, Katie Casper, Kristina A Butler, Sarah L Cohen Rassier\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the diagnostic performance of hysteroscopy-guided versus blind sampling in detecting concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to identify factors associated with missing cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Integrated academic and community healthcare system in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>This included 151 patients diagnosed with EIN during endometrial sampling who underwent a hysterectomy within 3 months. Patients with concurrent cancer diagnoses were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients diagnosed with EIN using hysteroscopy-directed biopsy were compared to those diagnosed with blind-sampling methods using the pathology results of the subsequent hysterectomy specimen as the gold standard comparator to analyze rates of missed endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was a reduced risk of unanticipated concurrent EC on the final hysterectomy pathology result for patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia via a hysteroscopy-directed biopsy (odds ratios [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.20-0.95, p = .033). In multivariate analysis, body mass index ≥30 and patient age >60 were associated with an elevated risk of EC on final pathology (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.51-11.51, p = .004; OR = 5.56, 95% CI = 1.22-35.21, p < .001), respectively, and diabetes mellitus was the only independent variable associated with a higher risk of EIN on final hysterectomy pathology (OR = 7.01, 95% CI = 1.40-35.04, p = .018). Age, body mass index, and endometrial thickness on pre-biopsy ultrasound were not associated with an increased risk of overlooking concurrent endometrial carcinoma on final hysterectomy pathology on univariate and multivariate analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hysteroscopy-directed biopsy may reduce the risk of missing a concurrent endometrial malignancy during endometrial sampling in women with EIN. The results affirm the superior diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy-directed endometrial evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.021\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of minimally invasive gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.03.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较宫腔镜引导下与盲检对子宫内膜上皮内瘤变并发性子宫内膜癌的诊断效果,并探讨与漏诊相关的因素。设计:这是一项回顾性队列研究。背景:2018年1月1日和2023年1月1日,美国明尼苏达州和威斯康星州的综合学术和社区医疗保健系统参与者:包括151名在子宫内膜取样期间诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的患者,这些患者在三个月内接受了子宫切除术。同时患有癌症的患者被排除在外。干预措施:将宫腔镜下活检诊断为子宫内膜上皮内瘤变的患者与盲法取样诊断的患者进行比较,以随后子宫切除术标本的病理结果作为金标准比较物,分析子宫内膜癌的漏诊率。测量结果和主要结果:主要结果是通过宫腔镜活检诊断为子宫内膜上皮内增生的患者在最终子宫切除术病理结果中发生意外并发子宫内膜癌的风险降低(OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.20-0.95, p = 0.033)。在多因素分析中,体重指数≥30和患者年龄≥60与最终病理结果中子宫内膜癌的风险升高相关(OR=4.17, 95% CI=1.51-11.51, p = 0.004;OR=5.56, 95% CI=1.22-35.21,结论:子宫内膜上皮内瘤变患者在子宫内膜取样时,宫腔镜指导下活检可降低遗漏并发子宫内膜恶性肿瘤的风险。结果证实了宫腔镜指导下子宫内膜评估的优越诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hysteroscopy-Guided Endometrial Sampling Diagnostic Performance in Endometrial Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients.

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of hysteroscopy-guided versus blind sampling in detecting concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) and to identify factors associated with missing cancer diagnosis.

Design: This is a retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Integrated academic and community healthcare system in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, January 1, 2018, and January 1, 2023.

Participants: This included 151 patients diagnosed with EIN during endometrial sampling who underwent a hysterectomy within 3 months. Patients with concurrent cancer diagnoses were excluded.

Interventions: Patients diagnosed with EIN using hysteroscopy-directed biopsy were compared to those diagnosed with blind-sampling methods using the pathology results of the subsequent hysterectomy specimen as the gold standard comparator to analyze rates of missed endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was a reduced risk of unanticipated concurrent EC on the final hysterectomy pathology result for patients diagnosed with endometrial intraepithelial hyperplasia via a hysteroscopy-directed biopsy (odds ratios [OR] = 0.44, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.20-0.95, p = .033). In multivariate analysis, body mass index ≥30 and patient age >60 were associated with an elevated risk of EC on final pathology (OR = 4.17, 95% CI = 1.51-11.51, p = .004; OR = 5.56, 95% CI = 1.22-35.21, p < .001), respectively, and diabetes mellitus was the only independent variable associated with a higher risk of EIN on final hysterectomy pathology (OR = 7.01, 95% CI = 1.40-35.04, p = .018). Age, body mass index, and endometrial thickness on pre-biopsy ultrasound were not associated with an increased risk of overlooking concurrent endometrial carcinoma on final hysterectomy pathology on univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusion: Hysteroscopy-directed biopsy may reduce the risk of missing a concurrent endometrial malignancy during endometrial sampling in women with EIN. The results affirm the superior diagnostic accuracy of hysteroscopy-directed endometrial evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
272
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, formerly titled The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, is an international clinical forum for the exchange and dissemination of ideas, findings and techniques relevant to gynecologic endoscopy and other minimally invasive procedures. The Journal, which presents research, clinical opinions and case reports from the brightest minds in gynecologic surgery, is an authoritative source informing practicing physicians of the latest, cutting-edge developments occurring in this emerging field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信