PHQ-2单独及联合PHQ-9识别创伤性脑损伤患者重度抑郁的准确性

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Charles H Bombardier, Erin G Mistretta, Rebecca Altschuler, Jason Barber, Jesse R Fann
{"title":"PHQ-2单独及联合PHQ-9识别创伤性脑损伤患者重度抑郁的准确性","authors":"Charles H Bombardier, Erin G Mistretta, Rebecca Altschuler, Jason Barber, Jesse R Fann","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reliability, construct validity, and screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and the combined PHQ-2/PHQ-9 to detect major depressive disorder (MDD) in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were 135 adults within 1 year of sustaining complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI, initially recruited for a depression treatment trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Screening validity study relative to structured diagnostic assessment.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 depression scales, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff for the PHQ-2 alone is a score of 2 or more which results in a sensitivity of .86 and a specificity of .83. When the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 are combined in a 2-step process, the optimal cutoffs are 1 or more on the PHQ-2 and a total of 5 or more of the 9 PHQ-9 symptoms endorsed at least several days in the past 2 weeks. This resulted in a sensitivity of .93 and a specificity of .89 and only 53.6% of patients needed to be administered the entire PHQ-9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2-step PHQ-2/PHQ-9 screening process described here represents an efficient, reliable, and valid means of detecting MDD in people with TBI. Results suggest that the generic PHQ-2/PHQ-9 depression screening parameters adopted within large U.S. federal entities may disadvantage people with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and Combined With the PHQ-9 to Identify Major Depression in Traumatic Brain Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Charles H Bombardier, Erin G Mistretta, Rebecca Altschuler, Jason Barber, Jesse R Fann\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the reliability, construct validity, and screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and the combined PHQ-2/PHQ-9 to detect major depressive disorder (MDD) in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 trauma center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants were 135 adults within 1 year of sustaining complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI, initially recruited for a depression treatment trial.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Screening validity study relative to structured diagnostic assessment.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 depression scales, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal cutoff for the PHQ-2 alone is a score of 2 or more which results in a sensitivity of .86 and a specificity of .83. When the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 are combined in a 2-step process, the optimal cutoffs are 1 or more on the PHQ-2 and a total of 5 or more of the 9 PHQ-9 symptoms endorsed at least several days in the past 2 weeks. This resulted in a sensitivity of .93 and a specificity of .89 and only 53.6% of patients needed to be administered the entire PHQ-9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2-step PHQ-2/PHQ-9 screening process described here represents an efficient, reliable, and valid means of detecting MDD in people with TBI. Results suggest that the generic PHQ-2/PHQ-9 depression screening parameters adopted within large U.S. federal entities may disadvantage people with TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001054\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价《患者健康问卷-2》(PHQ-2)及联合问卷(PHQ-2 /PHQ-9)检测创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者重度抑郁障碍(MDD)的信度、构建效度和筛查准确性。地点:一级创伤中心。参与者:参与者为135名持续1年的成人,患有复杂的轻度、中度或重度TBI,最初招募参加抑郁症治疗试验。设计:与结构化诊断评估相关的筛选效度研究。干预措施:不适用。主要测量方法:PHQ-2和PHQ-9抑郁量表,《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈。结果:单独检测PHQ-2的最佳临界值为2分或2分以上,灵敏度为0.86,特异性为0.83。当PHQ-2和PHQ-9在一个两步的过程中结合时,最佳的截止点是PHQ-2的一个或多个,并且在过去两周内至少有几天出现了9个PHQ-9症状中的5个或更多。这导致敏感性为0.93,特异性为0.89,只有53.6%的患者需要使用整个PHQ-9。结论:本文描述的两步PHQ-2/PHQ-9筛查过程是一种有效、可靠和有效的检测TBI患者MDD的方法。结果表明,在美国大型联邦机构中采用的通用PHQ-2/PHQ-9抑郁症筛查参数可能对TBI患者不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Accuracy of the PHQ-2 Alone and Combined With the PHQ-9 to Identify Major Depression in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Objective: To assess the reliability, construct validity, and screening accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) and the combined PHQ-2/PHQ-9 to detect major depressive disorder (MDD) in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Setting: Level 1 trauma center.

Participants: Participants were 135 adults within 1 year of sustaining complicated mild, moderate, or severe TBI, initially recruited for a depression treatment trial.

Design: Screening validity study relative to structured diagnostic assessment.

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main measures: PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 depression scales, Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition.

Results: The optimal cutoff for the PHQ-2 alone is a score of 2 or more which results in a sensitivity of .86 and a specificity of .83. When the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 are combined in a 2-step process, the optimal cutoffs are 1 or more on the PHQ-2 and a total of 5 or more of the 9 PHQ-9 symptoms endorsed at least several days in the past 2 weeks. This resulted in a sensitivity of .93 and a specificity of .89 and only 53.6% of patients needed to be administered the entire PHQ-9.

Conclusion: The 2-step PHQ-2/PHQ-9 screening process described here represents an efficient, reliable, and valid means of detecting MDD in people with TBI. Results suggest that the generic PHQ-2/PHQ-9 depression screening parameters adopted within large U.S. federal entities may disadvantage people with TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信