社会风险与参保成人急性医疗保健利用。

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Morgan Clennin, Mario Schootman, Emma L Tucher, Liza M Reifler, Suma Vupputuri, Meagan Brown, John Adams, Stacie L Daugherty
{"title":"社会风险与参保成人急性医疗保健利用。","authors":"Morgan Clennin, Mario Schootman, Emma L Tucher, Liza M Reifler, Suma Vupputuri, Meagan Brown, John Adams, Stacie L Daugherty","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Millions of Americans are impacted by adverse social risk factors such as financial strain, housing instability, and food insecurity. A better understanding of if and how these factors are associated with acute care utilization is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between exposure to social risk factors and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among a sample of insured adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used US health data from a national initiative that employed a multistage, stratified sampling framework across 8 regional markets of an integrated health care delivery system. Eligible participants were insured adults who responded to health surveys. Population-based samples were taken proportionate to the sex and age distribution of each market.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Validated survey questions captured social risk exposure (positive screening for financial strain, housing instability, and/or food insecurity) during the past year; across 2 survey waves (2020, 2022). Self-reported social risk was categorized into mutually exclusive risk levels, social risk vs no social risk.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was acute health care utilization defined as time to the first event (ED visit, hospitalization) observed following the first survey completion (January 2020 to July 2023). Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression examined the association between social risk and subsequent care utilization, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort included 9785 survey respondents. The weighted cohort data (mean age, 48.4 years [95% CI, 47.9-48.9 years]) included 54.1% female respondents (95% CI, 52.3%-55.9%); 14.6% of the sample were Asian (95% CI, 13.3%-16.0%), 8.1% Black (95% CI, 7.3%-9.1%), 27.1% Hispanic (95% CI, 25.5%-28.8%), and 43.6% non-Hispanic White (95% CI, 41.2%-44.7%); and 50.3% reported exposure to 1 or more social risk factor. During the follow-up period (median [IQR], 3.48 [3.01-3.50] years), 25.4% (95% CI, 22.9%-28.1%) and 10.3% (95% CI, 8.9%-11.9%) of the cohort experienced an ED visit and hospitalization, respectively. Utilization rates varied by level of social risk exposure. Respondents who reported any social risk had a 21% higher risk of an ED visit compared with those with no social risk exposure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03-1.41]). Social risk was not associated with hospitalizations (adjusted HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.32]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort of 9785 adults, the significant association between social risk and time to first ED event warrants future study to determine if improved social risk are associated with lower ED utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e254253"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Risk and Acute Health Care Utilization Among Insured Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Morgan Clennin, Mario Schootman, Emma L Tucher, Liza M Reifler, Suma Vupputuri, Meagan Brown, John Adams, Stacie L Daugherty\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Millions of Americans are impacted by adverse social risk factors such as financial strain, housing instability, and food insecurity. A better understanding of if and how these factors are associated with acute care utilization is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between exposure to social risk factors and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among a sample of insured adults.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study used US health data from a national initiative that employed a multistage, stratified sampling framework across 8 regional markets of an integrated health care delivery system. Eligible participants were insured adults who responded to health surveys. Population-based samples were taken proportionate to the sex and age distribution of each market.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Validated survey questions captured social risk exposure (positive screening for financial strain, housing instability, and/or food insecurity) during the past year; across 2 survey waves (2020, 2022). Self-reported social risk was categorized into mutually exclusive risk levels, social risk vs no social risk.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was acute health care utilization defined as time to the first event (ED visit, hospitalization) observed following the first survey completion (January 2020 to July 2023). Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression examined the association between social risk and subsequent care utilization, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analytic cohort included 9785 survey respondents. The weighted cohort data (mean age, 48.4 years [95% CI, 47.9-48.9 years]) included 54.1% female respondents (95% CI, 52.3%-55.9%); 14.6% of the sample were Asian (95% CI, 13.3%-16.0%), 8.1% Black (95% CI, 7.3%-9.1%), 27.1% Hispanic (95% CI, 25.5%-28.8%), and 43.6% non-Hispanic White (95% CI, 41.2%-44.7%); and 50.3% reported exposure to 1 or more social risk factor. During the follow-up period (median [IQR], 3.48 [3.01-3.50] years), 25.4% (95% CI, 22.9%-28.1%) and 10.3% (95% CI, 8.9%-11.9%) of the cohort experienced an ED visit and hospitalization, respectively. Utilization rates varied by level of social risk exposure. Respondents who reported any social risk had a 21% higher risk of an ED visit compared with those with no social risk exposure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03-1.41]). Social risk was not associated with hospitalizations (adjusted HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.32]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort of 9785 adults, the significant association between social risk and time to first ED event warrants future study to determine if improved social risk are associated with lower ED utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"e254253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11962667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Network Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4253\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.4253","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:数以百万计的美国人受到不利的社会风险因素的影响,如财政紧张、住房不稳定和粮食不安全。需要更好地了解这些因素是否以及如何与急性护理利用相关。目的:探讨社会危险因素暴露与参保成人急诊科(ED)就诊和住院的关系。设计、环境和参与者:本队列研究使用了来自美国一项国家倡议的健康数据,该倡议采用了跨8个综合医疗保健提供系统区域市场的多阶段分层抽样框架。合格的参与者是参加健康调查的有保险的成年人。以人口为基础的样本与每个市场的性别和年龄分布成比例。暴露:在过去一年中,经过验证的调查问题捕获了社会风险暴露(积极筛选财政紧张、住房不稳定和/或粮食不安全);跨越两波调查(2020年、2022年)。自我报告的社会风险分为相互排斥的风险水平,社会风险和无社会风险。主要结局和措施:主要结局是急性医疗保健利用,定义为第一次调查完成后(2020年1月至2023年7月)观察到的第一次事件(急诊室就诊、住院)的时间。加权Cox比例风险回归检验了社会风险与后续护理利用之间的关系,调整了人口统计学和临床协变量。结果:分析队列包括9785名调查对象。加权队列数据(平均年龄48.4岁[95% CI, 47.9-48.9岁])包括54.1%的女性受访者(95% CI, 52.3%-55.9%);14.6%的样本为亚洲人(95% CI, 13.3%-16.0%), 8.1%为黑人(95% CI, 7.3%-9.1%), 27.1%为西班牙裔(95% CI, 25.5%-28.8%), 43.6%为非西班牙裔白人(95% CI, 41.2%-44.7%);50.3%的人报告暴露于一种或多种社会风险因素。在随访期间(中位[IQR], 3.48[3.01-3.50]年),25.4% (95% CI, 22.9%-28.1%)和10.3% (95% CI, 8.9%-11.9%)的队列患者分别有急诊科就诊和住院经历。利用率因社会风险暴露程度而异。与没有社会风险暴露的受访者相比,报告有任何社会风险的受访者ED就诊的风险高21%(调整后的风险比[HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03-1.41])。社会风险与住院治疗无关(调整后HR为1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.32])。结论和相关性:在9785名成年人的队列中,社会风险与首次ED事件发生时间之间的显著关联值得进一步研究,以确定社会风险的改善是否与ED使用率的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Risk and Acute Health Care Utilization Among Insured Adults.

Importance: Millions of Americans are impacted by adverse social risk factors such as financial strain, housing instability, and food insecurity. A better understanding of if and how these factors are associated with acute care utilization is needed.

Objective: To examine the association between exposure to social risk factors and emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations among a sample of insured adults.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study used US health data from a national initiative that employed a multistage, stratified sampling framework across 8 regional markets of an integrated health care delivery system. Eligible participants were insured adults who responded to health surveys. Population-based samples were taken proportionate to the sex and age distribution of each market.

Exposures: Validated survey questions captured social risk exposure (positive screening for financial strain, housing instability, and/or food insecurity) during the past year; across 2 survey waves (2020, 2022). Self-reported social risk was categorized into mutually exclusive risk levels, social risk vs no social risk.

Main outcomes and measures: Primary outcome was acute health care utilization defined as time to the first event (ED visit, hospitalization) observed following the first survey completion (January 2020 to July 2023). Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression examined the association between social risk and subsequent care utilization, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates.

Results: The analytic cohort included 9785 survey respondents. The weighted cohort data (mean age, 48.4 years [95% CI, 47.9-48.9 years]) included 54.1% female respondents (95% CI, 52.3%-55.9%); 14.6% of the sample were Asian (95% CI, 13.3%-16.0%), 8.1% Black (95% CI, 7.3%-9.1%), 27.1% Hispanic (95% CI, 25.5%-28.8%), and 43.6% non-Hispanic White (95% CI, 41.2%-44.7%); and 50.3% reported exposure to 1 or more social risk factor. During the follow-up period (median [IQR], 3.48 [3.01-3.50] years), 25.4% (95% CI, 22.9%-28.1%) and 10.3% (95% CI, 8.9%-11.9%) of the cohort experienced an ED visit and hospitalization, respectively. Utilization rates varied by level of social risk exposure. Respondents who reported any social risk had a 21% higher risk of an ED visit compared with those with no social risk exposure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03-1.41]). Social risk was not associated with hospitalizations (adjusted HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.32]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort of 9785 adults, the significant association between social risk and time to first ED event warrants future study to determine if improved social risk are associated with lower ED utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信