以人为中心的协同设计方法,用于人工智能检测放射治疗中计划剂量和交付剂量之间的差异。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Luca M Heising, Frank Verhaegen, Stefan G Scheib, Maria J G Jacobs, Carol X J Ou, Viola Mottarella, Yin-Ho Chong, Mariangela Zamburlini, Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten, Ans Swinnen, Michel Öllers, Cecile J A Wolfs
{"title":"以人为中心的协同设计方法,用于人工智能检测放射治疗中计划剂量和交付剂量之间的差异。","authors":"Luca M Heising, Frank Verhaegen, Stefan G Scheib, Maria J G Jacobs, Carol X J Ou, Viola Mottarella, Yin-Ho Chong, Mariangela Zamburlini, Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten, Ans Swinnen, Michel Öllers, Cecile J A Wolfs","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many artificial intelligence (AI) solutions have been proposed to enhance the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, but limited applications have been implemented to date, suggesting an implementation gap. One contributing factor to this gap is a misalignment between AI systems and their users. To address the AI implementation gap, we propose a human-centric methodology, novel in RT, for an interface design of an AI-driven RT treatment error detection system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-day design sprint was set up with a multi-disciplinary team of clinical and research staff and a commercial company. In the design sprint, an interface was prototyped to aid medical physicists in catching treatment errors during daily treatment fractions using dose-guided RT (DGRT) with a portal imager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The design sprint resulted in a simulated prototype of an interface supported by all stakeholders. Important features of an interface include the AI certainty metric, explainable AI features, feedback options, and decision aid. The prototype was well-received by expert users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/discussion: </strong>Using a co-creation strategy, which is a novel approach in RT, we were able to prototype a novel human-interpretable interface to detect RT treatment errors and aid the DGRT workflow. Users showed confidence that the overall design method and the proposed prototype could lead to a viable clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a human-centric co-design methodology for AI detection of differences between planned and delivered dose in radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Luca M Heising, Frank Verhaegen, Stefan G Scheib, Maria J G Jacobs, Carol X J Ou, Viola Mottarella, Yin-Ho Chong, Mariangela Zamburlini, Sebastiaan M J J G Nijsten, Ans Swinnen, Michel Öllers, Cecile J A Wolfs\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many artificial intelligence (AI) solutions have been proposed to enhance the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, but limited applications have been implemented to date, suggesting an implementation gap. One contributing factor to this gap is a misalignment between AI systems and their users. To address the AI implementation gap, we propose a human-centric methodology, novel in RT, for an interface design of an AI-driven RT treatment error detection system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 5-day design sprint was set up with a multi-disciplinary team of clinical and research staff and a commercial company. In the design sprint, an interface was prototyped to aid medical physicists in catching treatment errors during daily treatment fractions using dose-guided RT (DGRT) with a portal imager.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The design sprint resulted in a simulated prototype of an interface supported by all stakeholders. Important features of an interface include the AI certainty metric, explainable AI features, feedback options, and decision aid. The prototype was well-received by expert users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/discussion: </strong>Using a co-creation strategy, which is a novel approach in RT, we were able to prototype a novel human-interpretable interface to detect RT treatment errors and aid the DGRT workflow. Users showed confidence that the overall design method and the proposed prototype could lead to a viable clinical implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

已经提出了许多人工智能(AI)解决方案来增强放射治疗(RT)工作流程,但迄今为止实施的应用有限,表明实施差距。造成这种差距的一个因素是人工智能系统与其用户之间的不一致。为了解决人工智能实现的差距,我们提出了一种在人工智能驱动的人工智能治疗错误检测系统的界面设计中以人为中心的方法,这在人工智能中是新颖的。方法:由临床和研究人员组成的多学科团队与一家商业公司建立为期5天的设计冲刺。在设计冲刺中,设计了一个界面原型,以帮助医学物理学家使用带有传送门成像仪的剂量引导RT (DGRT)捕捉日常治疗过程中的治疗错误。结果:设计冲刺产生了所有利益相关者支持的界面模拟原型。界面的重要功能包括AI确定性度量、可解释的AI功能、反馈选项和决策辅助。原型机受到了专家用户的好评。结论/讨论:使用共同创建策略,这是RT中的一种新方法,我们能够原型化一种新的人类可解释界面,以检测RT治疗错误并帮助DGRT工作流程。用户对整体设计方法和提出的原型可以导致可行的临床实施表现出信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a human-centric co-design methodology for AI detection of differences between planned and delivered dose in radiotherapy.

Introduction: Many artificial intelligence (AI) solutions have been proposed to enhance the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, but limited applications have been implemented to date, suggesting an implementation gap. One contributing factor to this gap is a misalignment between AI systems and their users. To address the AI implementation gap, we propose a human-centric methodology, novel in RT, for an interface design of an AI-driven RT treatment error detection system.

Methods: A 5-day design sprint was set up with a multi-disciplinary team of clinical and research staff and a commercial company. In the design sprint, an interface was prototyped to aid medical physicists in catching treatment errors during daily treatment fractions using dose-guided RT (DGRT) with a portal imager.

Results: The design sprint resulted in a simulated prototype of an interface supported by all stakeholders. Important features of an interface include the AI certainty metric, explainable AI features, feedback options, and decision aid. The prototype was well-received by expert users.

Conclusion/discussion: Using a co-creation strategy, which is a novel approach in RT, we were able to prototype a novel human-interpretable interface to detect RT treatment errors and aid the DGRT workflow. Users showed confidence that the overall design method and the proposed prototype could lead to a viable clinical implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信