支持卫生技术评估和付款人决策的真实证据:是现在还是永远?

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Linda A Murphy, Ron Akehurst, David Cunningham, Gérard de Pouvourville, Oriol Solà-Morales
{"title":"支持卫生技术评估和付款人决策的真实证据:是现在还是永远?","authors":"Linda A Murphy, Ron Akehurst, David Cunningham, Gérard de Pouvourville, Oriol Solà-Morales","doi":"10.1017/S0266462325000145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this policy article is twofold: (i) to provide a summary and update of recent important policy developments, in particular relevant guidance on the use of real-world data/real-world evidence (RWD/RWE) by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and (ii) to set out our policy recommendations on how the different elements of an \"RWE framework\" we have previously developed could support, further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies and payers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a targeted review and analysis of recent important policy developments. The aim was to build on our recommendations from previous work on the \"RWE Framework,\" and consider how the relevant tools from our Framework can further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies/payers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We provide eight conditions that we argue would, in combination, constitute the optimal use and acceptance of RWD/RWE for HTA. We believe that, should the eight conditions hold, RWD/RWE would enable more efficient access to medicines and healthcare technologies for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-quality, fit-for-purpose RWD/RWE can and should be used more frequently in HTA. Multi-stakeholder and cross-geography collaborative partnerships are needed to align on best practices to optimize the evidence that needs to be generated to satisfy all stakeholders' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":"41 1","pages":"e20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world evidence to support health technology assessment and payer decision making: is it now or never?\",\"authors\":\"Linda A Murphy, Ron Akehurst, David Cunningham, Gérard de Pouvourville, Oriol Solà-Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462325000145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this policy article is twofold: (i) to provide a summary and update of recent important policy developments, in particular relevant guidance on the use of real-world data/real-world evidence (RWD/RWE) by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and (ii) to set out our policy recommendations on how the different elements of an \\\"RWE framework\\\" we have previously developed could support, further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies and payers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a targeted review and analysis of recent important policy developments. The aim was to build on our recommendations from previous work on the \\\"RWE Framework,\\\" and consider how the relevant tools from our Framework can further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies/payers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We provide eight conditions that we argue would, in combination, constitute the optimal use and acceptance of RWD/RWE for HTA. We believe that, should the eight conditions hold, RWD/RWE would enable more efficient access to medicines and healthcare technologies for patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High-quality, fit-for-purpose RWD/RWE can and should be used more frequently in HTA. Multi-stakeholder and cross-geography collaborative partnerships are needed to align on best practices to optimize the evidence that needs to be generated to satisfy all stakeholders' needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"e20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000145\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462325000145","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本政策条文的目的是双重的:(i)总结和更新最近重要的政策发展,特别是卫生技术评估机构使用真实数据/真实证据(RWD/RWE)的相关指导;(ii)就我们先前制定的“RWE框架”的不同要素如何支持、进一步加强和促进RWE在卫生技术评估目的中的使用,以及卫生技术评估机构和付款人的使用,提出政策建议。方法:我们对近期重要的政策发展进行了有针对性的回顾和分析。目的是在我们之前关于“RWE框架”工作的建议的基础上,考虑我们框架中的相关工具如何进一步加强和促进RWE在HTA目的中的使用以及HTA机构/付款人的使用。结果:我们提供了八个条件,我们认为,这些条件结合起来,构成了RWD/RWE在HTA中的最佳使用和接受度。我们认为,如果满足这八项条件,RWD/RWE将使患者能够更有效地获得药品和医疗保健技术。结论:高质量、符合目的的RWD/RWE可以而且应该在HTA中更频繁地使用。需要建立多利益攸关方和跨地域合作伙伴关系,以协调最佳做法,优化需要产生的证据,以满足所有利益攸关方的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world evidence to support health technology assessment and payer decision making: is it now or never?

Objectives: The aim of this policy article is twofold: (i) to provide a summary and update of recent important policy developments, in particular relevant guidance on the use of real-world data/real-world evidence (RWD/RWE) by health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and (ii) to set out our policy recommendations on how the different elements of an "RWE framework" we have previously developed could support, further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies and payers.

Methods: We undertook a targeted review and analysis of recent important policy developments. The aim was to build on our recommendations from previous work on the "RWE Framework," and consider how the relevant tools from our Framework can further enhance and facilitate the use of RWE for HTA purposes and by HTA bodies/payers.

Results: We provide eight conditions that we argue would, in combination, constitute the optimal use and acceptance of RWD/RWE for HTA. We believe that, should the eight conditions hold, RWD/RWE would enable more efficient access to medicines and healthcare technologies for patients.

Conclusions: High-quality, fit-for-purpose RWD/RWE can and should be used more frequently in HTA. Multi-stakeholder and cross-geography collaborative partnerships are needed to align on best practices to optimize the evidence that needs to be generated to satisfy all stakeholders' needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信