Raiza M Beltran, Anna-Sophia Katomski, Stephen Bonett, Rosina Cianelli, Amy Corneli, Donaldson F Conserve, Joseph P De Santis, Danielle Estes, Susan M Graham, Laura Hoyt D'Anna, Naana Koranteng-Yorke, Kathryn M Nowotny, Tam Phan, Carlos Rodriguez-Diaz, Waimar Tun, Stefan Baral, Sheree Schwartz, Julia L Marcus
{"title":"医疗服务提供者参与艾滋病毒暴露前预防实施研究的经验教训。","authors":"Raiza M Beltran, Anna-Sophia Katomski, Stephen Bonett, Rosina Cianelli, Amy Corneli, Donaldson F Conserve, Joseph P De Santis, Danielle Estes, Susan M Graham, Laura Hoyt D'Anna, Naana Koranteng-Yorke, Kathryn M Nowotny, Tam Phan, Carlos Rodriguez-Diaz, Waimar Tun, Stefan Baral, Sheree Schwartz, Julia L Marcus","doi":"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care providers are critical for successful implementation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but barriers to PrEP provision persist. Researchers must engage with providers to understand how to optimize PrEP delivery across settings. Yet researcher-provider collaborations can be challenging. To offer guidance on engaging providers in PrEP implementation research, we synthesized the experiences of researchers working with different types of providers on studies related to PrEP implementation that were funded as part of the US Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Geographic areas designated as high priority by the EHE initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined providers broadly, including physicians, pharmacists, health educators, and peer navigators. Using thematic analysis from collaborative case reports by EHE study teams, we synthesized strategies, challenges, and successes related to provider engagement, with categorization into three stages of research: study development, recruitment, and data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 17 research teams invited, 9 contributed. Findings suggested that extensive resources (eg, time, professional networks, financial, and nonfinancial incentives) are required to engage clinical and nonclinical providers across all stages of PrEP implementation research, with the most intensive strategies required for recruiting clinical providers who are not yet providing PrEP. However, when effective strategies are deployed, this investment of resources can yield rich insights into PrEP implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lessons learned by the investigators in our study can be applied to future EHE-funded projects, other HIV-prevention studies, and studies in other areas of health research to improve engagement of providers during all stages of the research process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14588,"journal":{"name":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","volume":"98 5S","pages":"e129-e135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned From Engaging Healthcare Providers in Research on Implementation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis.\",\"authors\":\"Raiza M Beltran, Anna-Sophia Katomski, Stephen Bonett, Rosina Cianelli, Amy Corneli, Donaldson F Conserve, Joseph P De Santis, Danielle Estes, Susan M Graham, Laura Hoyt D'Anna, Naana Koranteng-Yorke, Kathryn M Nowotny, Tam Phan, Carlos Rodriguez-Diaz, Waimar Tun, Stefan Baral, Sheree Schwartz, Julia L Marcus\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/QAI.0000000000003612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care providers are critical for successful implementation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but barriers to PrEP provision persist. Researchers must engage with providers to understand how to optimize PrEP delivery across settings. Yet researcher-provider collaborations can be challenging. To offer guidance on engaging providers in PrEP implementation research, we synthesized the experiences of researchers working with different types of providers on studies related to PrEP implementation that were funded as part of the US Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Geographic areas designated as high priority by the EHE initiative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We defined providers broadly, including physicians, pharmacists, health educators, and peer navigators. Using thematic analysis from collaborative case reports by EHE study teams, we synthesized strategies, challenges, and successes related to provider engagement, with categorization into three stages of research: study development, recruitment, and data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 17 research teams invited, 9 contributed. Findings suggested that extensive resources (eg, time, professional networks, financial, and nonfinancial incentives) are required to engage clinical and nonclinical providers across all stages of PrEP implementation research, with the most intensive strategies required for recruiting clinical providers who are not yet providing PrEP. However, when effective strategies are deployed, this investment of resources can yield rich insights into PrEP implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The lessons learned by the investigators in our study can be applied to future EHE-funded projects, other HIV-prevention studies, and studies in other areas of health research to improve engagement of providers during all stages of the research process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"volume\":\"98 5S\",\"pages\":\"e129-e135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12175253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003612\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000003612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lessons Learned From Engaging Healthcare Providers in Research on Implementation of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis.
Background: Health care providers are critical for successful implementation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), but barriers to PrEP provision persist. Researchers must engage with providers to understand how to optimize PrEP delivery across settings. Yet researcher-provider collaborations can be challenging. To offer guidance on engaging providers in PrEP implementation research, we synthesized the experiences of researchers working with different types of providers on studies related to PrEP implementation that were funded as part of the US Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) initiative.
Setting: Geographic areas designated as high priority by the EHE initiative.
Methods: We defined providers broadly, including physicians, pharmacists, health educators, and peer navigators. Using thematic analysis from collaborative case reports by EHE study teams, we synthesized strategies, challenges, and successes related to provider engagement, with categorization into three stages of research: study development, recruitment, and data collection.
Results: Among 17 research teams invited, 9 contributed. Findings suggested that extensive resources (eg, time, professional networks, financial, and nonfinancial incentives) are required to engage clinical and nonclinical providers across all stages of PrEP implementation research, with the most intensive strategies required for recruiting clinical providers who are not yet providing PrEP. However, when effective strategies are deployed, this investment of resources can yield rich insights into PrEP implementation.
Conclusions: The lessons learned by the investigators in our study can be applied to future EHE-funded projects, other HIV-prevention studies, and studies in other areas of health research to improve engagement of providers during all stages of the research process.
期刊介绍:
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes seeks to end the HIV epidemic by presenting important new science across all disciplines that advance our understanding of the biology, treatment and prevention of HIV infection worldwide.
JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes is the trusted, interdisciplinary resource for HIV- and AIDS-related information with a strong focus on basic and translational science, clinical science, and epidemiology and prevention. Co-edited by the foremost leaders in clinical virology, molecular biology, and epidemiology, JAIDS publishes vital information on the advances in diagnosis and treatment of HIV infections, as well as the latest research in the development of therapeutics and vaccine approaches. This ground-breaking journal brings together rigorously peer-reviewed articles, reviews of current research, results of clinical trials, and epidemiologic reports from around the world.