英国南亚裔母亲产后抑郁症的群体心理干预- ROSHNI-2随机对照试验

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nusrat Husain, Karina Lovell, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Farah Lunat, Penny Bee, Matthias Pierce, Najia Atif, Saadia Aseem, Kamaldeep Bhui, Peter Bower, Traolach Brugha, Nasim Chaudhry, Akbar Ullah, Linda Davies, Nadeem Gire, Deepali Sharma, Jahanara Miah, Waqas Ahmed, Joe Kai, Ilyas Mirza, Jillian Morrison, Naeem Mohmed, Atif Rahman, Shanaya Rathod, Najma Siddiqi, Waquas Waheed, Christopher Williams, Nosheen Zaidi, Richard Emsley, Richard Morriss
{"title":"英国南亚裔母亲产后抑郁症的群体心理干预- ROSHNI-2随机对照试验","authors":"Nusrat Husain, Karina Lovell, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Farah Lunat, Penny Bee, Matthias Pierce, Najia Atif, Saadia Aseem, Kamaldeep Bhui, Peter Bower, Traolach Brugha, Nasim Chaudhry, Akbar Ullah, Linda Davies, Nadeem Gire, Deepali Sharma, Jahanara Miah, Waqas Ahmed, Joe Kai, Ilyas Mirza, Jillian Morrison, Naeem Mohmed, Atif Rahman, Shanaya Rathod, Najma Siddiqi, Waquas Waheed, Christopher Williams, Nosheen Zaidi, Richard Emsley, Richard Morriss","doi":"10.3310/KKDS6622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postnatal depression is more common in British South Asian women than white women in the United Kingdom. Despite empirical evidence suggesting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy as a first line of treatment, little evidence is available regarding its applicability to different minority ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a culturally adapted group psychological intervention (Positive Health Programme) in primary care for British South Asian women with postnatal depression compared with treatment as usual.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General practices and children's centres in the North West, East Midlands, Yorkshire, Glasgow and London.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>British South Asian women meeting the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (Fifth Edition) depression criteria, aged 16 years or above, with infants up to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicentre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot and partially nested design to compare treatment as usual plus the Positive Health Programme with treatment as usual in British South Asian women with postnatal depression, with a qualitative study to examine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The Positive Health Programme, a culturally adapted group intervention based on the principles of cognitive-behavioural therapy delivered by facilitators over 12 sessions.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measures: </strong>The primary outcome was recovery from depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤ 7) at end of intervention (approximately 4-6 months). Analysis of the primary outcome and the long-term follow-up (at 12 months) used a logistic random-effects model to estimate the odds ratio of caseness between treatments, adjusting for centre, severity of depression and education at baseline. Cost data were collected using an Economic Patient Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and thirty-two participants across four study centres were randomised by the Manchester Clinical Trials Unit. At 4 months, almost half of patients in the treatment (Positive Health Programme) group were recovered (138 or 49%), whereas 105 (37%) were recovered in the control (treatment as usual) group. By 12 months, the control (treatment as usual) and treatment (Positive Health Programme) group had over 50% recovery at 140 (54%) and 141 (54%), respectively. For the primary outcome, recovery from postnatal depression at end of intervention, we found a significant effect such that the odds of achieving recovery in the treatment group were almost twice as high compared to the treatment as usual group (odds ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 3.10). Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in the odds of recovery at 12 months (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.66), highlighting a need for more intensive therapies and/or longer-term care plans for this group of patients.</p><p><strong>Qualitative results: </strong>The intervention was considered feasible and acceptable from the perspectives of Positive Health Programme participants, facilitators, and general practitioners. The findings suggest improved emotional and social support and an enhanced sense of well-being.</p><p><strong>Economic evaluation: </strong>Positive Health Programme implementation was estimated to cost an average of £408 per participant. The intention-to-treat analysis shows that the Positive Health Programme intervention costs £22,198 per quality-adjusted life-year gain. Positive Health Programme was cost-effective on average but with a substantial uncertainty: the probability that Positive Health Programme was cost-effective was 44% (65%) at the willingness to pay £20,000 (£30,000) per quality-adjusted life-year. The Positive Health Programme was highly cost-effective for those who attended 5-8 sessions, costing £9040 per quality-adjusted life-year.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study sample limits generalisability with other ethnic minority groups, and the cost-effectiveness analysis did not explore recall bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study provide robust evidence that the culturally adapted psychological intervention for postnatal depression in South Asian women is effective at the primary end point and acceptable to women.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Further development of the Positive Health Programme intervention and evaluation, with longer-term outcome follow-ups and exploration of cost-effectiveness of remote delivery of the Positive Health Programme.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10697380.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/68/08) and is published in full in <i>Health Technology Assessment</i>; Vol. 29, No. 6. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":"29 6","pages":"1-113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A group psychological intervention for postnatal depression in British mothers of South Asian origin - the ROSHNI-2 RCT.\",\"authors\":\"Nusrat Husain, Karina Lovell, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Farah Lunat, Penny Bee, Matthias Pierce, Najia Atif, Saadia Aseem, Kamaldeep Bhui, Peter Bower, Traolach Brugha, Nasim Chaudhry, Akbar Ullah, Linda Davies, Nadeem Gire, Deepali Sharma, Jahanara Miah, Waqas Ahmed, Joe Kai, Ilyas Mirza, Jillian Morrison, Naeem Mohmed, Atif Rahman, Shanaya Rathod, Najma Siddiqi, Waquas Waheed, Christopher Williams, Nosheen Zaidi, Richard Emsley, Richard Morriss\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/KKDS6622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postnatal depression is more common in British South Asian women than white women in the United Kingdom. Despite empirical evidence suggesting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy as a first line of treatment, little evidence is available regarding its applicability to different minority ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a culturally adapted group psychological intervention (Positive Health Programme) in primary care for British South Asian women with postnatal depression compared with treatment as usual.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General practices and children's centres in the North West, East Midlands, Yorkshire, Glasgow and London.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>British South Asian women meeting the <i>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</i> (Fifth Edition) depression criteria, aged 16 years or above, with infants up to 12 months.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A multicentre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot and partially nested design to compare treatment as usual plus the Positive Health Programme with treatment as usual in British South Asian women with postnatal depression, with a qualitative study to examine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The Positive Health Programme, a culturally adapted group intervention based on the principles of cognitive-behavioural therapy delivered by facilitators over 12 sessions.</p><p><strong>Outcomes measures: </strong>The primary outcome was recovery from depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤ 7) at end of intervention (approximately 4-6 months). Analysis of the primary outcome and the long-term follow-up (at 12 months) used a logistic random-effects model to estimate the odds ratio of caseness between treatments, adjusting for centre, severity of depression and education at baseline. Cost data were collected using an Economic Patient Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and thirty-two participants across four study centres were randomised by the Manchester Clinical Trials Unit. At 4 months, almost half of patients in the treatment (Positive Health Programme) group were recovered (138 or 49%), whereas 105 (37%) were recovered in the control (treatment as usual) group. By 12 months, the control (treatment as usual) and treatment (Positive Health Programme) group had over 50% recovery at 140 (54%) and 141 (54%), respectively. For the primary outcome, recovery from postnatal depression at end of intervention, we found a significant effect such that the odds of achieving recovery in the treatment group were almost twice as high compared to the treatment as usual group (odds ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 3.10). Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in the odds of recovery at 12 months (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.66), highlighting a need for more intensive therapies and/or longer-term care plans for this group of patients.</p><p><strong>Qualitative results: </strong>The intervention was considered feasible and acceptable from the perspectives of Positive Health Programme participants, facilitators, and general practitioners. The findings suggest improved emotional and social support and an enhanced sense of well-being.</p><p><strong>Economic evaluation: </strong>Positive Health Programme implementation was estimated to cost an average of £408 per participant. The intention-to-treat analysis shows that the Positive Health Programme intervention costs £22,198 per quality-adjusted life-year gain. Positive Health Programme was cost-effective on average but with a substantial uncertainty: the probability that Positive Health Programme was cost-effective was 44% (65%) at the willingness to pay £20,000 (£30,000) per quality-adjusted life-year. The Positive Health Programme was highly cost-effective for those who attended 5-8 sessions, costing £9040 per quality-adjusted life-year.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study sample limits generalisability with other ethnic minority groups, and the cost-effectiveness analysis did not explore recall bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study provide robust evidence that the culturally adapted psychological intervention for postnatal depression in South Asian women is effective at the primary end point and acceptable to women.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>Further development of the Positive Health Programme intervention and evaluation, with longer-term outcome follow-ups and exploration of cost-effectiveness of remote delivery of the Positive Health Programme.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10697380.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/68/08) and is published in full in <i>Health Technology Assessment</i>; Vol. 29, No. 6. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health technology assessment\",\"volume\":\"29 6\",\"pages\":\"1-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973614/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/KKDS6622\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/KKDS6622","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产后抑郁症在英国南亚女性中比白人女性更常见。尽管经验证据表明认知行为疗法作为一线治疗的有效性,但很少有证据表明它适用于不同的少数民族群体。目的:确定文化适应群体心理干预(积极健康方案)与常规治疗相比在英国南亚产后抑郁症妇女初级保健中的临床和成本效益。环境:在西北,东米德兰兹,约克郡,格拉斯哥和伦敦的一般做法和儿童中心。参与者:符合精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版)抑郁标准的英国南亚女性,年龄16岁或以上,婴儿不超过12个月。设计:一项多中心随机对照试验,采用内部试点和部分嵌套设计,比较英国南亚产后抑郁症妇女的常规治疗加积极健康方案与常规治疗,并进行定性研究,以检查干预的可接受性和可行性。干预措施:积极健康方案,这是一项基于认知行为疗法原则的适应文化的群体干预措施,由调解员在12次会议上提供。结果测量:主要结果是干预结束时(约4-6个月)抑郁恢复(汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表≤7)。对主要结局和长期随访(12个月)的分析使用logistic随机效应模型来估计治疗之间病例的优势比,调整中心、抑郁严重程度和基线教育。使用患者经济问卷收集成本数据。结果:来自四个研究中心的732名参与者被曼彻斯特临床试验单位随机分组。在4个月时,治疗(积极健康方案)组中几乎有一半患者康复(138人或49%),而对照组(照常治疗)组中有105人(37%)康复。到12个月时,对照组(照常治疗)和治疗组(积极健康方案)的康复率超过50%,分别为140(54%)和141(54%)。对于主要结局,干预结束后产后抑郁症的恢复,我们发现了显著的影响,治疗组实现恢复的几率几乎是普通治疗组的两倍(优势比1.97,95%可信区间1.26至3.10)。在两组之间,12个月的康复几率没有显著差异(优势比1.02,95%置信区间0.62至1.66),强调需要对该组患者进行更强化的治疗和/或更长期的护理计划。定性结果:从积极健康方案参与者、促进者和全科医生的角度来看,该干预措施被认为是可行和可接受的。研究结果表明,情绪和社会支持会得到改善,幸福感也会增强。经济评价:据估计,实施积极健康方案的平均费用为每位参与者408英镑。意向治疗分析表明,积极健康方案干预措施每增加一个质量调整生命年花费22 198英镑。积极健康方案平均而言具有成本效益,但存在很大的不确定性:积极健康方案具有成本效益的概率为44%(65%),每个质量调整生命年愿意支付20,000英镑(30,000英镑)。积极健康方案对参加5-8次会议的人具有很高的成本效益,每个质量调整生命年的费用为9040英镑。局限性:研究样本限制了其他少数民族群体的普遍性,成本-效果分析没有探索回忆偏差。结论:本研究的结果提供了强有力的证据,表明南亚妇女产后抑郁症的文化适应性心理干预在主要终点是有效的,并且为妇女所接受。今后的工作:进一步发展积极健康方案的干预和评价,进行长期的结果跟踪,探索积极健康方案远程实施的成本效益。研究注册:当前对照试验ISRCTN10697380。资助:该奖项由美国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生技术评估项目(NIHR奖励编号:14/68/08)资助,全文发表在《卫生技术评估》杂志上;第29卷第6期有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A group psychological intervention for postnatal depression in British mothers of South Asian origin - the ROSHNI-2 RCT.

Background: Postnatal depression is more common in British South Asian women than white women in the United Kingdom. Despite empirical evidence suggesting the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy as a first line of treatment, little evidence is available regarding its applicability to different minority ethnic groups.

Objectives: Determining the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a culturally adapted group psychological intervention (Positive Health Programme) in primary care for British South Asian women with postnatal depression compared with treatment as usual.

Setting: General practices and children's centres in the North West, East Midlands, Yorkshire, Glasgow and London.

Participants: British South Asian women meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) depression criteria, aged 16 years or above, with infants up to 12 months.

Design: A multicentre randomised controlled trial with an internal pilot and partially nested design to compare treatment as usual plus the Positive Health Programme with treatment as usual in British South Asian women with postnatal depression, with a qualitative study to examine the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention.

Intervention: The Positive Health Programme, a culturally adapted group intervention based on the principles of cognitive-behavioural therapy delivered by facilitators over 12 sessions.

Outcomes measures: The primary outcome was recovery from depression (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤ 7) at end of intervention (approximately 4-6 months). Analysis of the primary outcome and the long-term follow-up (at 12 months) used a logistic random-effects model to estimate the odds ratio of caseness between treatments, adjusting for centre, severity of depression and education at baseline. Cost data were collected using an Economic Patient Questionnaire.

Results: Seven hundred and thirty-two participants across four study centres were randomised by the Manchester Clinical Trials Unit. At 4 months, almost half of patients in the treatment (Positive Health Programme) group were recovered (138 or 49%), whereas 105 (37%) were recovered in the control (treatment as usual) group. By 12 months, the control (treatment as usual) and treatment (Positive Health Programme) group had over 50% recovery at 140 (54%) and 141 (54%), respectively. For the primary outcome, recovery from postnatal depression at end of intervention, we found a significant effect such that the odds of achieving recovery in the treatment group were almost twice as high compared to the treatment as usual group (odds ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval 1.26 to 3.10). Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in the odds of recovery at 12 months (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 1.66), highlighting a need for more intensive therapies and/or longer-term care plans for this group of patients.

Qualitative results: The intervention was considered feasible and acceptable from the perspectives of Positive Health Programme participants, facilitators, and general practitioners. The findings suggest improved emotional and social support and an enhanced sense of well-being.

Economic evaluation: Positive Health Programme implementation was estimated to cost an average of £408 per participant. The intention-to-treat analysis shows that the Positive Health Programme intervention costs £22,198 per quality-adjusted life-year gain. Positive Health Programme was cost-effective on average but with a substantial uncertainty: the probability that Positive Health Programme was cost-effective was 44% (65%) at the willingness to pay £20,000 (£30,000) per quality-adjusted life-year. The Positive Health Programme was highly cost-effective for those who attended 5-8 sessions, costing £9040 per quality-adjusted life-year.

Limitations: The study sample limits generalisability with other ethnic minority groups, and the cost-effectiveness analysis did not explore recall bias.

Conclusions: The results of this study provide robust evidence that the culturally adapted psychological intervention for postnatal depression in South Asian women is effective at the primary end point and acceptable to women.

Future work: Further development of the Positive Health Programme intervention and evaluation, with longer-term outcome follow-ups and exploration of cost-effectiveness of remote delivery of the Positive Health Programme.

Study registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN10697380.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 14/68/08) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 29, No. 6. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信