颅内刺激治疗儿童难治性癫痫:使用不断发展的疗法的单一机构经验。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70006
Rohin Singh, Megan M J Bauman, Karimul Islam, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Sanjeet S Grewal, Jonathon J Parker, Jamie J Van Gompel, Kai J Miller, Brian N Lundstrom, Keith Starnes
{"title":"颅内刺激治疗儿童难治性癫痫:使用不断发展的疗法的单一机构经验。","authors":"Rohin Singh, Megan M J Bauman, Karimul Islam, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Sanjeet S Grewal, Jonathon J Parker, Jamie J Van Gompel, Kai J Miller, Brian N Lundstrom, Keith Starnes","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuromodulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) is preferred when the seizure onset zone is not amenable to surgical resection, due to multifocal onset or involvement of eloquent cortex. Given its rapidly evolving landscape, we describe our institutional experience with neurostimulation therapies including deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus (DBS-ANT), the centromedian nucleus (DBS-CM), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS) to treat PRE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) who presented to our institution with PRE. Patients were included who had at least 1 year of follow-up after neurostimulation was started. Patients with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction at last follow-up compared to baseline were classified as responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients (21 females) were included in the series. Nine patients underwent DBS-ANT, 9 underwent DBS-CM (+ ANT in 7 patients), 5 underwent RNS, and 12 underwent CSS. The median age at seizure onset and surgery was 8 and 16 years, respectively. Structural lesions were the most common etiology of epilepsy (54%). Eighteen patients had prior interventions and 13 received invasive EEG. Post-operative complications following neurostimulation implantation were noted in three patients (9%). However, no permanent deficits were noted. Median follow-up time was 46 months (range 13-162 months). Twenty-three patients (59%) were responders (3/9 DBS-ANT; 7/9 DBS-CM; 4/5 RNS; 9/12 CSS). Further, median seizure reduction was 25% (DBS-ANT), 89% (DBS-CM), 87% (RNS), and 88% (CSS) across the cohort. Six patients (17%) had improved subjective neurocognitive outcomes while the other 29 had stable neurocognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>DBS, RNS, and CSS are safe and effective options for PRE. An understanding of treatment approaches can optimize results by tailoring therapy to individual patients.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study investigates the use of various neurostimulation therapies for treating pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS). Overall, neuromodulation was found to be effective in reducing seizures in most patients, with 59% of patients showing at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Additionally, the treatments were generally safe, with few complications and no instances of permanent deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracranial stimulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy: A single institutional experience using evolving therapies.\",\"authors\":\"Rohin Singh, Megan M J Bauman, Karimul Islam, Panagiotis Kerezoudis, Sanjeet S Grewal, Jonathon J Parker, Jamie J Van Gompel, Kai J Miller, Brian N Lundstrom, Keith Starnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/epi4.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neuromodulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) is preferred when the seizure onset zone is not amenable to surgical resection, due to multifocal onset or involvement of eloquent cortex. Given its rapidly evolving landscape, we describe our institutional experience with neurostimulation therapies including deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus (DBS-ANT), the centromedian nucleus (DBS-CM), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS) to treat PRE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) who presented to our institution with PRE. Patients were included who had at least 1 year of follow-up after neurostimulation was started. Patients with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction at last follow-up compared to baseline were classified as responders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 35 patients (21 females) were included in the series. Nine patients underwent DBS-ANT, 9 underwent DBS-CM (+ ANT in 7 patients), 5 underwent RNS, and 12 underwent CSS. The median age at seizure onset and surgery was 8 and 16 years, respectively. Structural lesions were the most common etiology of epilepsy (54%). Eighteen patients had prior interventions and 13 received invasive EEG. Post-operative complications following neurostimulation implantation were noted in three patients (9%). However, no permanent deficits were noted. Median follow-up time was 46 months (range 13-162 months). Twenty-three patients (59%) were responders (3/9 DBS-ANT; 7/9 DBS-CM; 4/5 RNS; 9/12 CSS). Further, median seizure reduction was 25% (DBS-ANT), 89% (DBS-CM), 87% (RNS), and 88% (CSS) across the cohort. Six patients (17%) had improved subjective neurocognitive outcomes while the other 29 had stable neurocognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>DBS, RNS, and CSS are safe and effective options for PRE. An understanding of treatment approaches can optimize results by tailoring therapy to individual patients.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>This study investigates the use of various neurostimulation therapies for treating pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS). Overall, neuromodulation was found to be effective in reducing seizures in most patients, with 59% of patients showing at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Additionally, the treatments were generally safe, with few complications and no instances of permanent deficits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70006\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:小儿难治性癫痫(PRE)的神经调节是首选的,当癫痫发作区不适合手术切除,由于多灶性发作或累及大脑皮层。鉴于其快速发展的前景,我们描述了我们在神经刺激疗法方面的机构经验,包括前核深部脑刺激(DBS) (DBS- ant)、中核(DBS- cm)、反应性神经刺激(RNS)和慢性阈下刺激(CSS)治疗PRE。方法:采用回顾性图表分析,确定以PRE就诊的儿科患者(≤18岁)。纳入的患者在神经刺激开始后至少有1年的随访。与基线相比,最后一次随访时癫痫发作频率降低≥50%的患者被归类为应答者。结果:共纳入35例患者,其中21例为女性。9例患者行DBS-ANT, 9例患者行DBS-CM(7例+ ANT), 5例患者行RNS, 12例患者行CSS。癫痫发作和手术的中位年龄分别为8岁和16岁。结构病变是癫痫最常见的病因(54%)。18例患者事先接受干预,13例接受有创脑电图。3例患者(9%)出现神经刺激植入术后并发症。然而,没有发现永久性赤字。中位随访时间为46个月(13-162个月)。23例(59%)患者有反应(3/9 DBS-ANT;7/9 DBS-CM;4/5 RNS;9/12的CSS)。此外,整个队列中癫痫发作减少的中位数分别为25% (DBS-ANT)、89% (DBS-CM)、87% (RNS)和88% (CSS)。6名患者(17%)的主观神经认知结果有所改善,而其他29名患者的神经认知结果稳定。意义:DBS、RNS和CSS是PRE安全有效的选择。对治疗方法的了解可以通过针对个别患者的定制治疗来优化结果。摘要:本研究探讨了各种神经刺激疗法在治疗儿童难治性癫痫(PRE)中的应用,包括深部脑刺激(DBS)、反应性神经刺激(RNS)和慢性阈下刺激(CSS)。总的来说,神经调节被发现对减少大多数患者的癫痫发作有效,59%的患者显示癫痫发作频率至少减少50%。此外,治疗通常是安全的,几乎没有并发症,也没有永久性缺陷的例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intracranial stimulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy: A single institutional experience using evolving therapies.

Objective: Neuromodulation for pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) is preferred when the seizure onset zone is not amenable to surgical resection, due to multifocal onset or involvement of eloquent cortex. Given its rapidly evolving landscape, we describe our institutional experience with neurostimulation therapies including deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus (DBS-ANT), the centromedian nucleus (DBS-CM), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS) to treat PRE.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify pediatric patients (≤18 years of age) who presented to our institution with PRE. Patients were included who had at least 1 year of follow-up after neurostimulation was started. Patients with ≥50% seizure frequency reduction at last follow-up compared to baseline were classified as responders.

Results: A total of 35 patients (21 females) were included in the series. Nine patients underwent DBS-ANT, 9 underwent DBS-CM (+ ANT in 7 patients), 5 underwent RNS, and 12 underwent CSS. The median age at seizure onset and surgery was 8 and 16 years, respectively. Structural lesions were the most common etiology of epilepsy (54%). Eighteen patients had prior interventions and 13 received invasive EEG. Post-operative complications following neurostimulation implantation were noted in three patients (9%). However, no permanent deficits were noted. Median follow-up time was 46 months (range 13-162 months). Twenty-three patients (59%) were responders (3/9 DBS-ANT; 7/9 DBS-CM; 4/5 RNS; 9/12 CSS). Further, median seizure reduction was 25% (DBS-ANT), 89% (DBS-CM), 87% (RNS), and 88% (CSS) across the cohort. Six patients (17%) had improved subjective neurocognitive outcomes while the other 29 had stable neurocognitive outcomes.

Significance: DBS, RNS, and CSS are safe and effective options for PRE. An understanding of treatment approaches can optimize results by tailoring therapy to individual patients.

Plain language summary: This study investigates the use of various neurostimulation therapies for treating pediatric refractory epilepsy (PRE) including deep brain stimulation (DBS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS), and chronic subthreshold stimulation (CSS). Overall, neuromodulation was found to be effective in reducing seizures in most patients, with 59% of patients showing at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Additionally, the treatments were generally safe, with few complications and no instances of permanent deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信