IF 1.3 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetology International Pub Date : 2025-02-07 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s13340-025-00803-3
Yuka Suzuki, Aika Miya, Akinobu Nakamura, Takahisa Handa, Hiraku Kameda, Tatsuya Atsumi
{"title":"Perception of hyper-/hypoglycemia and its related factors in type 2 diabetes: a continuous glucose monitoring-based prospective observational study.","authors":"Yuka Suzuki, Aika Miya, Akinobu Nakamura, Takahisa Handa, Hiraku Kameda, Tatsuya Atsumi","doi":"10.1007/s13340-025-00803-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Underestimating hyper-/hypoglycemia or failure to perceive hyperglycemia hinders optimal glucose management in diabetes care. Our study investigated individuals who, while aware of their hyper-/hypoglycemia, may not perceive them as problematic. Also, we clarified the factors contributing to discrepancies between these individuals' perceptions and the objective measurements.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a prospective observational study comprising 284 Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes who underwent ambulatory blinded professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-administered the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Individuals with a time above range (TAR; > 180 mg/dL) ≥ 25% and those who answered 0 (\"never\") or + 1 (\"almost never\") for the frequency of hyperglycemia in the DTSQ were defined as having no-perception of hyperglycemia. Individuals with a time below range (TBR; < 70 mg/dL) ≥ 4% with an answer of 0 or + 1 for the frequency of hypoglycemia were labeled as having no-perception of hypoglycemia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze clinical characteristics associated with the discrepancies between failure to perceive hyper-/hypoglycemia and TAR ≥ 25% or TBR ≥ 4%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insulin-use (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, <i>p</i> < 0.05) and older age (OR = 1.05, <i>p</i> < 0.05) were independent determinants of no-perception of hyperglycemia. Low eGFR was an independent determinant of no-perception of hypoglycemia (OR = 0.94, <i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No-insulin-use, being an older adult, and renal dysfunction are linked to the discrepancy between the perception of hyper-/hypoglycemia and actual blood glucose. These results will help create personalized diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11340,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology International","volume":"16 2","pages":"385-393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11954784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-025-00803-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:低估高血糖/低血糖或未察觉高血糖会阻碍糖尿病护理中的最佳血糖管理。我们的研究调查了这样一些人,他们虽然意识到自己患有高血糖/低血糖,但可能并没有将其视为有问题。此外,我们还阐明了导致这些人的认知与客观测量结果不一致的因素:本研究是一项前瞻性观察研究,共有 284 名日本 2 型糖尿病患者接受了门诊盲法专业连续血糖监测(CGM),并自我填写了糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQ)。在 DTSQ 中对高血糖频率的回答为 0("从不")或 +1("几乎从不")的患者中,超过范围时间(TAR; > 180 mg/dL)≥ 25% 的患者被定义为无高血糖感知。时间低于量程(TBR;结果:胰岛素使用(几率比))的个体被定义为无高血糖症状:胰岛素使用(几率比[OR] = 0.29,p p p p 结论:无胰岛素使用,即无胰岛素使用:不使用胰岛素、老年人和肾功能障碍与高血糖/低血糖感知和实际血糖之间的差异有关。这些结果将有助于创建个性化的糖尿病护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception of hyper-/hypoglycemia and its related factors in type 2 diabetes: a continuous glucose monitoring-based prospective observational study.

Aims: Underestimating hyper-/hypoglycemia or failure to perceive hyperglycemia hinders optimal glucose management in diabetes care. Our study investigated individuals who, while aware of their hyper-/hypoglycemia, may not perceive them as problematic. Also, we clarified the factors contributing to discrepancies between these individuals' perceptions and the objective measurements.

Materials and methods: This study was a prospective observational study comprising 284 Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes who underwent ambulatory blinded professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and self-administered the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Individuals with a time above range (TAR; > 180 mg/dL) ≥ 25% and those who answered 0 ("never") or + 1 ("almost never") for the frequency of hyperglycemia in the DTSQ were defined as having no-perception of hyperglycemia. Individuals with a time below range (TBR; < 70 mg/dL) ≥ 4% with an answer of 0 or + 1 for the frequency of hypoglycemia were labeled as having no-perception of hypoglycemia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze clinical characteristics associated with the discrepancies between failure to perceive hyper-/hypoglycemia and TAR ≥ 25% or TBR ≥ 4%.

Results: Insulin-use (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, p < 0.05) and older age (OR = 1.05, p < 0.05) were independent determinants of no-perception of hyperglycemia. Low eGFR was an independent determinant of no-perception of hypoglycemia (OR = 0.94, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: No-insulin-use, being an older adult, and renal dysfunction are linked to the discrepancy between the perception of hyper-/hypoglycemia and actual blood glucose. These results will help create personalized diabetes care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetology International
Diabetology International ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Diabetology International, the official journal of the Japan Diabetes Society, publishes original research articles about experimental research and clinical studies in diabetes and related areas. The journal also presents editorials, reviews, commentaries, reports of expert committees, and case reports on any aspect of diabetes. Diabetology International welcomes submissions from researchers, clinicians, and health professionals throughout the world who are interested in research, treatment, and care of patients with diabetes. All manuscripts are peer-reviewed to assure that high-quality information in the field of diabetes is made available to readers. Manuscripts are reviewed with due respect for the author''s confidentiality. At the same time, reviewers also have rights to confidentiality, which are respected by the editors. The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信