{"title":"乳腺癌治疗期间与新型抗肿瘤药物相关的间质性肺疾病的不相称性分析:一项药物警戒研究","authors":"Zijun Zhu, Yongxin Li, Chaoyong Zhu, Qiuxia Dong, Yixiao Zhang, Zhilin Liu, Dengfeng Ren, Fuxing Zhao, Jiuda Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that some antineoplastic agents may be associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), but large-scale real-world data are lacking. This study aimed to detect signals of disproportionate reporting for ILD associated with novel antineoplastic agents used in breast cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pharmacovigilance study, we collected data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS; Jan 01, 2004-Dec 31, 2023) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER; Jan 01, 2004-Mar 31, 2024) databases. Data retrieval involved direct download of structured datasets from the FDA and PMDA portals. Participant selection included reports of FDA-approved novel antineoplastic agents for breast cancer with documented ILD as a preferred term, excluding duplicates, non-breast cancer indications, unapproved drugs, and cases where drugs were classified as concomitant or interacting. Signals of disproportionate reporting were assessed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), with statistical significance defined as a lower 95% confidence interval >1 and ≥3 ILD cases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 2913 patients with ILD from FAERS and 1868 from JADER were analysed. We identified 9 agents with reporting signals for ILD in FAERS: ROR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for trastuzumab deruxtecan was 12.17 (95% CI 11.04-13.41), atezolizumab 6.04 (5.02-7.28), everolimus 3.21 (2.95-3.50), abemaciclib 2.87 (2.52-3.27), pertuzumab 2.84 (2.49-3.25), olaparib 2.29 (1.65-3.19), trastuzumab emtansine 2.27 (1.91-2.69), pembrolizumab 2.06 (1.65-2.58), and trastuzumab 1.36 (1.25-1.49). 7 drugs associated with ILD in JADER are also captured in FAERS. Fatal cases presented with a shorter median onset time compared to nonfatal cases (56 vs. 71 days in FAERS, <i>P</i> = 0.015; 59 vs. 76.5 days in JADER, <i>P</i> = 0.046). Analyses indicated stronger reporting associations between novel antineoplastic agents and ILD compared to chemotherapeutics (FAERS: OR 2.47, 2.16-2.81; JADER: OR 1.61, 1.37-1.88; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). ILD reports were more frequent among older patients (FAERS: HR 1.0097, 1.0036-1.0159, <i>P</i> = 0.0020; JADER: HR 1.0183, 1.0094-1.0270, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), while higher weight correlated with fewer reports (FAERS: HR 0.9783, 0.9729-0.9836; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our study detected signals of disproportionate reporting for ILD with some novel antineoplastic agents in breast cancer, fatal cases had a shorter median onset time than nonfatal ones. Novel antineoplastic agents showed stronger signal of disproportionate reporting associations with ILD than chemotherapeutics. Older age and lower weight were associated with more frequent ILD reports. The limitations-including incomplete data, inherent pharmacovigilance biases, and coprescription bias-preclude causal interpretation of the observed associations and may lead to overestimation or underestimation of reporting signals. These findings highlight the need for vigilant ILD monitoring but require validation through prospective studies to clarify true clinical risks.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"82 ","pages":"103160"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957809/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disproportionality analysis of interstitial lung disease associated with novel antineoplastic agents during breast cancer treatment: a pharmacovigilance study.\",\"authors\":\"Zijun Zhu, Yongxin Li, Chaoyong Zhu, Qiuxia Dong, Yixiao Zhang, Zhilin Liu, Dengfeng Ren, Fuxing Zhao, Jiuda Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that some antineoplastic agents may be associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), but large-scale real-world data are lacking. This study aimed to detect signals of disproportionate reporting for ILD associated with novel antineoplastic agents used in breast cancer treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pharmacovigilance study, we collected data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS; Jan 01, 2004-Dec 31, 2023) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER; Jan 01, 2004-Mar 31, 2024) databases. Data retrieval involved direct download of structured datasets from the FDA and PMDA portals. Participant selection included reports of FDA-approved novel antineoplastic agents for breast cancer with documented ILD as a preferred term, excluding duplicates, non-breast cancer indications, unapproved drugs, and cases where drugs were classified as concomitant or interacting. Signals of disproportionate reporting were assessed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), with statistical significance defined as a lower 95% confidence interval >1 and ≥3 ILD cases.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 2913 patients with ILD from FAERS and 1868 from JADER were analysed. We identified 9 agents with reporting signals for ILD in FAERS: ROR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for trastuzumab deruxtecan was 12.17 (95% CI 11.04-13.41), atezolizumab 6.04 (5.02-7.28), everolimus 3.21 (2.95-3.50), abemaciclib 2.87 (2.52-3.27), pertuzumab 2.84 (2.49-3.25), olaparib 2.29 (1.65-3.19), trastuzumab emtansine 2.27 (1.91-2.69), pembrolizumab 2.06 (1.65-2.58), and trastuzumab 1.36 (1.25-1.49). 7 drugs associated with ILD in JADER are also captured in FAERS. Fatal cases presented with a shorter median onset time compared to nonfatal cases (56 vs. 71 days in FAERS, <i>P</i> = 0.015; 59 vs. 76.5 days in JADER, <i>P</i> = 0.046). Analyses indicated stronger reporting associations between novel antineoplastic agents and ILD compared to chemotherapeutics (FAERS: OR 2.47, 2.16-2.81; JADER: OR 1.61, 1.37-1.88; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). ILD reports were more frequent among older patients (FAERS: HR 1.0097, 1.0036-1.0159, <i>P</i> = 0.0020; JADER: HR 1.0183, 1.0094-1.0270, <i>P</i> < 0.0001), while higher weight correlated with fewer reports (FAERS: HR 0.9783, 0.9729-0.9836; <i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our study detected signals of disproportionate reporting for ILD with some novel antineoplastic agents in breast cancer, fatal cases had a shorter median onset time than nonfatal ones. Novel antineoplastic agents showed stronger signal of disproportionate reporting associations with ILD than chemotherapeutics. Older age and lower weight were associated with more frequent ILD reports. The limitations-including incomplete data, inherent pharmacovigilance biases, and coprescription bias-preclude causal interpretation of the observed associations and may lead to overestimation or underestimation of reporting signals. These findings highlight the need for vigilant ILD monitoring but require validation through prospective studies to clarify true clinical risks.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"103160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957809/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103160\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:研究表明,一些抗肿瘤药物可能与间质性肺疾病(ILD)有关,但缺乏大规模的真实数据。本研究旨在检测与乳腺癌治疗中使用的新型抗肿瘤药物相关的ILD的不成比例的报告信号。方法:在这项药物警戒研究中,我们从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS;2004年1月1日- 2023年12月31日)和日本不良药物事件报告(JADER;(2004年1月1日- 2024年3月31日)数据库。数据检索包括从FDA和PMDA门户网站直接下载结构化数据集。参与者选择包括fda批准的用于乳腺癌的新型抗肿瘤药物的报告,并将记录的ILD作为首选术语,排除重复,非乳腺癌适应症,未批准的药物以及药物被分类为伴随或相互作用的病例。使用报告优势比(ROR)评估不成比例报告的信号,统计显著性定义为95%置信区间较低bbb1和≥3例ILD病例。结果:共分析了来自FAERS的2913例ILD患者和来自JADER的1868例ILD患者。我们在FAERS中确定了9种具有ILD报告信号的药物:曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康的ROR和95%置信区间(CI)为12.17 (95% CI 11.04-13.41),阿特唑单抗为6.04(5.02-7.28),依维莫司为3.21(2.95-3.50),阿贝马昔利布为2.87(2.52-3.27),帕妥珠单抗为2.84(2.49-3.25),奥拉帕尼为2.29(1.65-3.19),曲妥珠单抗为emtansine 2.27(1.91-2.69),派姆单抗为2.06(1.65-2.58),曲妥珠单抗为1.36(1.25-1.49)。与JADER中ILD相关的7种药物也在FAERS中被捕获。与非致死性病例相比,致死性病例的中位发病时间更短(FAERS中56天和71天,P = 0.015;JADER组为76.5天,P = 0.046)。分析表明,与化疗药物相比,新型抗肿瘤药物与ILD之间的相关性更强(FAERS: OR 2.47, 2.16-2.81;Jader:或1.61,1.37-1.88;p = 0.0020;JADER: HR 1.0183, 1.0094-1.0270, P P解释:我们的研究发现,在乳腺癌中,一些新型抗肿瘤药物对ILD的报道不成比例,致死性病例的中位发病时间比非致死性病例短。新型抗肿瘤药物与ILD的不成比例的相关性比化疗药物更强。年龄越大,体重越轻,ILD报告越频繁。这些局限性——包括数据不完整、固有的药物警戒偏差和处方偏差——排除了对观察到的关联的因果解释,并可能导致对报告信号的高估或低估。这些发现强调了警惕ILD监测的必要性,但需要通过前瞻性研究验证,以澄清真正的临床风险。资金:没有。
Disproportionality analysis of interstitial lung disease associated with novel antineoplastic agents during breast cancer treatment: a pharmacovigilance study.
Background: Studies have shown that some antineoplastic agents may be associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD), but large-scale real-world data are lacking. This study aimed to detect signals of disproportionate reporting for ILD associated with novel antineoplastic agents used in breast cancer treatment.
Methods: In this pharmacovigilance study, we collected data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS; Jan 01, 2004-Dec 31, 2023) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER; Jan 01, 2004-Mar 31, 2024) databases. Data retrieval involved direct download of structured datasets from the FDA and PMDA portals. Participant selection included reports of FDA-approved novel antineoplastic agents for breast cancer with documented ILD as a preferred term, excluding duplicates, non-breast cancer indications, unapproved drugs, and cases where drugs were classified as concomitant or interacting. Signals of disproportionate reporting were assessed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), with statistical significance defined as a lower 95% confidence interval >1 and ≥3 ILD cases.
Findings: A total of 2913 patients with ILD from FAERS and 1868 from JADER were analysed. We identified 9 agents with reporting signals for ILD in FAERS: ROR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for trastuzumab deruxtecan was 12.17 (95% CI 11.04-13.41), atezolizumab 6.04 (5.02-7.28), everolimus 3.21 (2.95-3.50), abemaciclib 2.87 (2.52-3.27), pertuzumab 2.84 (2.49-3.25), olaparib 2.29 (1.65-3.19), trastuzumab emtansine 2.27 (1.91-2.69), pembrolizumab 2.06 (1.65-2.58), and trastuzumab 1.36 (1.25-1.49). 7 drugs associated with ILD in JADER are also captured in FAERS. Fatal cases presented with a shorter median onset time compared to nonfatal cases (56 vs. 71 days in FAERS, P = 0.015; 59 vs. 76.5 days in JADER, P = 0.046). Analyses indicated stronger reporting associations between novel antineoplastic agents and ILD compared to chemotherapeutics (FAERS: OR 2.47, 2.16-2.81; JADER: OR 1.61, 1.37-1.88; P < 0.0001). ILD reports were more frequent among older patients (FAERS: HR 1.0097, 1.0036-1.0159, P = 0.0020; JADER: HR 1.0183, 1.0094-1.0270, P < 0.0001), while higher weight correlated with fewer reports (FAERS: HR 0.9783, 0.9729-0.9836; P < 0.0001).
Interpretation: Our study detected signals of disproportionate reporting for ILD with some novel antineoplastic agents in breast cancer, fatal cases had a shorter median onset time than nonfatal ones. Novel antineoplastic agents showed stronger signal of disproportionate reporting associations with ILD than chemotherapeutics. Older age and lower weight were associated with more frequent ILD reports. The limitations-including incomplete data, inherent pharmacovigilance biases, and coprescription bias-preclude causal interpretation of the observed associations and may lead to overestimation or underestimation of reporting signals. These findings highlight the need for vigilant ILD monitoring but require validation through prospective studies to clarify true clinical risks.
期刊介绍:
eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.