使用改良明尼苏达解毒量表评估酒精戒断综合征:一项综合评价。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Torri Trojand, Jaclynn Morgan, Charles J Shamoun
{"title":"使用改良明尼苏达解毒量表评估酒精戒断综合征:一项综合评价。","authors":"Torri Trojand, Jaclynn Morgan, Charles J Shamoun","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorder in the United States is increasing. Alcohol is the second most commonly abused drug worldwide, resulting in acute hospitalizations related to alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome relies on screening tools to determine the need for treatment. The most commonly used tool is the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale-Revised (CIWA-Ar), which has not been validated for use in critical care units.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale (mMINDS) is more effective than the CIWA-Ar for evaluating acute withdrawal symptoms in patients in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This integrative review used the framework of Whittemore and Knafl. The literature was searched for studies related to mMINDS, neurocritical care, and critical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles were included in the review. The review revealed 3 outcomes: nurses preferred the mMINDS over the CIWA-Ar, assessments with the mMINDS tool was more accurate for patients with CIWA-Ar scores greater than 10, and patient outcomes were improved with use of the mMINDS. The mMINDS is preferred over the CIWA-Ar for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients in intensive care units because it is associated with shorter stays, less benzodiazepine use, and a decrease in delirium tremens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings regarding mMINDS can apply to both critical care and non-critical care settings. The mMINDS is preferred by nurses and results in more positive patient outcomes. The mMINDS is effective and should be used in critical care areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 2","pages":"60-68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the Modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale to Evaluate Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: An Integrative Review.\",\"authors\":\"Torri Trojand, Jaclynn Morgan, Charles J Shamoun\",\"doi\":\"10.4037/ccn2025568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alcohol use disorder in the United States is increasing. Alcohol is the second most commonly abused drug worldwide, resulting in acute hospitalizations related to alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome relies on screening tools to determine the need for treatment. The most commonly used tool is the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale-Revised (CIWA-Ar), which has not been validated for use in critical care units.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate whether the modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale (mMINDS) is more effective than the CIWA-Ar for evaluating acute withdrawal symptoms in patients in intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This integrative review used the framework of Whittemore and Knafl. The literature was searched for studies related to mMINDS, neurocritical care, and critical care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine articles were included in the review. The review revealed 3 outcomes: nurses preferred the mMINDS over the CIWA-Ar, assessments with the mMINDS tool was more accurate for patients with CIWA-Ar scores greater than 10, and patient outcomes were improved with use of the mMINDS. The mMINDS is preferred over the CIWA-Ar for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients in intensive care units because it is associated with shorter stays, less benzodiazepine use, and a decrease in delirium tremens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings regarding mMINDS can apply to both critical care and non-critical care settings. The mMINDS is preferred by nurses and results in more positive patient outcomes. The mMINDS is effective and should be used in critical care areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"volume\":\"45 2\",\"pages\":\"60-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025568\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:美国的酒精使用障碍正在增加。酒精是世界上第二大最常被滥用的药物,导致与酒精使用和酒精戒断综合症有关的急性住院。酒精戒断综合征的管理依赖于筛查工具来确定是否需要治疗。最常用的工具是临床研究所酒精戒断评估量表修订版(CIWA-Ar),该工具尚未被证实可用于重症监护病房。目的:评价改良明尼苏达戒毒量表(mMINDS)是否比CIWA-Ar更有效地评价重症监护病房患者的急性戒断症状。方法:本综述采用Whittemore和Knafl的框架。文献检索了与心智、神经危重症护理和危重症护理相关的研究。结果:共纳入9篇文章。回顾显示了3个结果:护士更喜欢使用mMINDS而不是CIWA-Ar,使用mMINDS工具对CIWA-Ar评分大于10分的患者的评估更准确,使用mMINDS可以改善患者的预后。对于重症监护病房的酒精戒断综合征患者,mMINDS优于CIWA-Ar,因为它与较短的住院时间、较少的苯二氮卓类药物使用和减少震颤谵妄有关。结论:该研究结果适用于危重病和非危重病护理环境。护士们更喜欢使用mMINDS,并且对患者的治疗效果更积极。mMINDS是有效的,应该在重症监护领域使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the Modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale to Evaluate Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome: An Integrative Review.

Background: Alcohol use disorder in the United States is increasing. Alcohol is the second most commonly abused drug worldwide, resulting in acute hospitalizations related to alcohol use and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome relies on screening tools to determine the need for treatment. The most commonly used tool is the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol Scale-Revised (CIWA-Ar), which has not been validated for use in critical care units.

Objective: To evaluate whether the modified Minnesota Detoxification Scale (mMINDS) is more effective than the CIWA-Ar for evaluating acute withdrawal symptoms in patients in intensive care units.

Methods: This integrative review used the framework of Whittemore and Knafl. The literature was searched for studies related to mMINDS, neurocritical care, and critical care.

Results: Nine articles were included in the review. The review revealed 3 outcomes: nurses preferred the mMINDS over the CIWA-Ar, assessments with the mMINDS tool was more accurate for patients with CIWA-Ar scores greater than 10, and patient outcomes were improved with use of the mMINDS. The mMINDS is preferred over the CIWA-Ar for managing alcohol withdrawal syndrome in patients in intensive care units because it is associated with shorter stays, less benzodiazepine use, and a decrease in delirium tremens.

Conclusion: The findings regarding mMINDS can apply to both critical care and non-critical care settings. The mMINDS is preferred by nurses and results in more positive patient outcomes. The mMINDS is effective and should be used in critical care areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信