不同供体神经神经化的上腹部深下穿支皮瓣乳房重建的感觉:T11和T12的比较。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ashley Zhang, Sophia Arbuiso, Marcos Lu Wang, Hao Huang, Grant G Black, Angela Ellison, David M Otterburn
{"title":"不同供体神经神经化的上腹部深下穿支皮瓣乳房重建的感觉:T11和T12的比较。","authors":"Ashley Zhang, Sophia Arbuiso, Marcos Lu Wang, Hao Huang, Grant G Black, Angela Ellison, David M Otterburn","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap can be reliably neurotized for autologous breast reconstruction. In standard fashion, a sensory branch of intercostal nerve T11 or T12 of the DIEP flap is coapted to the anterior cutaneous branch of T3 at the recipient site. In this study, we compare objective sensation recovery and patient-reported sensation, for DIEP flaps innervated by T11 versus T12.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing neurotized DIEP flap reconstruction after mastectomy were prospectively identified. All nerve coaptation was performed with an allograft between T11 or T12 to T3; the donor nerve was selected by the surgeon based on intraoperative viability and appearance. Sensation testing was performed with a pressure-specified sensory device in the superior, medial, inferior, and lateral quadrants of the breast and at the nipple-areolar complex at specified time points. Patients were additionally invited to complete the Sensation Module of the BREAST-Q postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five neurotized DIEP flaps in 42 patients were included; 35 flaps innervated with T11, and 30 flaps innervated with T12. Preoperative breast sensitivity measurements were comparable between the two groups. In the first 6 months after reconstruction, breasts innervated by T12 were more sensitive in the medial quadrant (P = 0.019). Six to 12 months after reconstruction, the T12 cohort had greater sensitivity in most breast regions (P < 0.05). After 12 months, T12 sensation was superior in the inferior and lateral quadrants (P < 0.05). Postoperative patient-reported breast sensation and breast symptoms were similar, but patients with T12-innervated reconstruction had higher quality-of-life impact BREAST-Q scores, trending toward significance (72 [62-100] vs 62 [48.5-70.25], P = 0.309).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIEP flaps innervated with T12 have superior sensation recovery compared to flaps innervated with T11. Moreover, patients receiving flaps innervated with T12 report higher quality-of-life relating to breast sensation. When multiple viable donor nerves are available for coaptation, T12 may be the preferred choice due to its superior sensory outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S271-S275"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensation in Neurotized Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction With Different Donor Nerves: Comparing T11 and T12.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Zhang, Sophia Arbuiso, Marcos Lu Wang, Hao Huang, Grant G Black, Angela Ellison, David M Otterburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap can be reliably neurotized for autologous breast reconstruction. In standard fashion, a sensory branch of intercostal nerve T11 or T12 of the DIEP flap is coapted to the anterior cutaneous branch of T3 at the recipient site. In this study, we compare objective sensation recovery and patient-reported sensation, for DIEP flaps innervated by T11 versus T12.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing neurotized DIEP flap reconstruction after mastectomy were prospectively identified. All nerve coaptation was performed with an allograft between T11 or T12 to T3; the donor nerve was selected by the surgeon based on intraoperative viability and appearance. Sensation testing was performed with a pressure-specified sensory device in the superior, medial, inferior, and lateral quadrants of the breast and at the nipple-areolar complex at specified time points. Patients were additionally invited to complete the Sensation Module of the BREAST-Q postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-five neurotized DIEP flaps in 42 patients were included; 35 flaps innervated with T11, and 30 flaps innervated with T12. Preoperative breast sensitivity measurements were comparable between the two groups. In the first 6 months after reconstruction, breasts innervated by T12 were more sensitive in the medial quadrant (P = 0.019). Six to 12 months after reconstruction, the T12 cohort had greater sensitivity in most breast regions (P < 0.05). After 12 months, T12 sensation was superior in the inferior and lateral quadrants (P < 0.05). Postoperative patient-reported breast sensation and breast symptoms were similar, but patients with T12-innervated reconstruction had higher quality-of-life impact BREAST-Q scores, trending toward significance (72 [62-100] vs 62 [48.5-70.25], P = 0.309).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIEP flaps innervated with T12 have superior sensation recovery compared to flaps innervated with T11. Moreover, patients receiving flaps innervated with T12 report higher quality-of-life relating to breast sensation. When multiple viable donor nerves are available for coaptation, T12 may be the preferred choice due to its superior sensory outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 4S Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S271-S275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004257\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下腹穿孔带(DIEP)皮瓣可以可靠地神经化用于自体乳房重建。按照标准方式,DIEP 皮瓣的肋间神经 T11 或 T12 的感觉分支与受区 T3 的前皮支连接。在这项研究中,我们比较了由 T11 和 T12 神经支配的 DIEP 皮瓣的客观感觉恢复情况和患者报告的感觉情况:我们对乳房切除术后接受神经化 DIEP 皮瓣重建术的患者进行了前瞻性鉴定。所有神经接合都是通过T11或T12至T3之间的异体神经进行的;供体神经由外科医生根据术中的存活率和外观进行选择。在指定的时间点,使用压力指定的感觉装置对乳房的上象限、内象限、下象限和外象限以及乳头乳晕复合体进行感觉测试。此外,还邀请患者在术后完成 BREAST-Q 的感觉模块:42名患者的65个神经化DIEP皮瓣被纳入研究,其中35个皮瓣由T11神经支配,30个皮瓣由T12神经支配。两组患者术前的乳房敏感度测量结果相当。在重建后的头 6 个月,由 T12 神经支配的乳房在内侧象限更敏感(P = 0.019)。重建后 6 到 12 个月,T12 组在大多数乳房区域的敏感度更高(P < 0.05)。12 个月后,T12 在下象限和外象限的敏感度更高(P < 0.05)。术后患者报告的乳房感觉和乳房症状相似,但接受T12神经重建的患者生活质量影响BREAST-Q评分更高,呈显著性趋势(72 [62-100] vs 62 [48.5-70.25],P = 0.309):结论:与接受T11神经支配的皮瓣相比,接受T12神经支配的DIEP皮瓣具有更佳的感觉恢复效果。结论:与使用 T11 神经支配的皮瓣相比,使用 T12 神经支配的 DIEP 皮瓣具有更佳的感觉恢复效果,而且使用 T12 神经支配的皮瓣的患者在乳房感觉方面的生活质量更高。当有多条可行的供体神经可供连接时,T12神经可能是首选,因为它的感觉效果更佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensation in Neurotized Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction With Different Donor Nerves: Comparing T11 and T12.

Background: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap can be reliably neurotized for autologous breast reconstruction. In standard fashion, a sensory branch of intercostal nerve T11 or T12 of the DIEP flap is coapted to the anterior cutaneous branch of T3 at the recipient site. In this study, we compare objective sensation recovery and patient-reported sensation, for DIEP flaps innervated by T11 versus T12.

Methods: Patients undergoing neurotized DIEP flap reconstruction after mastectomy were prospectively identified. All nerve coaptation was performed with an allograft between T11 or T12 to T3; the donor nerve was selected by the surgeon based on intraoperative viability and appearance. Sensation testing was performed with a pressure-specified sensory device in the superior, medial, inferior, and lateral quadrants of the breast and at the nipple-areolar complex at specified time points. Patients were additionally invited to complete the Sensation Module of the BREAST-Q postoperatively.

Results: Sixty-five neurotized DIEP flaps in 42 patients were included; 35 flaps innervated with T11, and 30 flaps innervated with T12. Preoperative breast sensitivity measurements were comparable between the two groups. In the first 6 months after reconstruction, breasts innervated by T12 were more sensitive in the medial quadrant (P = 0.019). Six to 12 months after reconstruction, the T12 cohort had greater sensitivity in most breast regions (P < 0.05). After 12 months, T12 sensation was superior in the inferior and lateral quadrants (P < 0.05). Postoperative patient-reported breast sensation and breast symptoms were similar, but patients with T12-innervated reconstruction had higher quality-of-life impact BREAST-Q scores, trending toward significance (72 [62-100] vs 62 [48.5-70.25], P = 0.309).

Conclusions: DIEP flaps innervated with T12 have superior sensation recovery compared to flaps innervated with T11. Moreover, patients receiving flaps innervated with T12 report higher quality-of-life relating to breast sensation. When multiple viable donor nerves are available for coaptation, T12 may be the preferred choice due to its superior sensory outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信