机器人腹膜瓣阴道成形术学习曲线的量化。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kshipra Hemal, Gaines Blasdel, Augustus Parker, Chris Amro, Charlie Dubach-Reinhold, Lee C Zhao, Rachel Bluebond-Langner
{"title":"机器人腹膜瓣阴道成形术学习曲线的量化。","authors":"Kshipra Hemal, Gaines Blasdel, Augustus Parker, Chris Amro, Charlie Dubach-Reinhold, Lee C Zhao, Rachel Bluebond-Langner","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The learning curve (LC) is the process of mastering a new technique. This study assesses the LC for robotic-assisted peritoneal flap gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients undergoing RPGAV between 09/2017 and 02/2023 at a single center was performed. Operative times (OT) were analyzed to describe the LC. A cutoff point was determined after which OT stabilized, and this was used to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred RPGAVs were performed. Median OT was 125 (interquartile range 105-181) minutes and decreased significantly over time. The minimum number of cases required to observe a plateau in OT is 300 patients.After adjusting for the LC, 2 variables significantly affected OT: a 1-point increase in body mass index increased OT by 1.4 minutes [95% confidence interval (1.0, 1.9), P < 0.001] and the single port robot decreased OT by 34 minutes [95% CI 1 (-43.1, -25.0), P < 0.001] as compared to the traditional multiport Xi robot.When comparing the first 300 cases (learning phase) to the last 200 (expert phase), length of stay, blood transfusions, and rates of elective revision surgery were lower in the expert phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LC for RPGAV in this large cohort was 300 cases. Patient body mass index causes a dose-response increase in OT and the single port robot dramatically decreases OT. Although OT is just one facet of overall efficiency, differences between learning and expert phases are evident in decreased length of stay, transfusions, and rates of revision surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S139-S144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the Learning Curve in Robotic Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Kshipra Hemal, Gaines Blasdel, Augustus Parker, Chris Amro, Charlie Dubach-Reinhold, Lee C Zhao, Rachel Bluebond-Langner\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The learning curve (LC) is the process of mastering a new technique. This study assesses the LC for robotic-assisted peritoneal flap gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients undergoing RPGAV between 09/2017 and 02/2023 at a single center was performed. Operative times (OT) were analyzed to describe the LC. A cutoff point was determined after which OT stabilized, and this was used to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred RPGAVs were performed. Median OT was 125 (interquartile range 105-181) minutes and decreased significantly over time. The minimum number of cases required to observe a plateau in OT is 300 patients.After adjusting for the LC, 2 variables significantly affected OT: a 1-point increase in body mass index increased OT by 1.4 minutes [95% confidence interval (1.0, 1.9), P < 0.001] and the single port robot decreased OT by 34 minutes [95% CI 1 (-43.1, -25.0), P < 0.001] as compared to the traditional multiport Xi robot.When comparing the first 300 cases (learning phase) to the last 200 (expert phase), length of stay, blood transfusions, and rates of elective revision surgery were lower in the expert phase.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LC for RPGAV in this large cohort was 300 cases. Patient body mass index causes a dose-response increase in OT and the single port robot dramatically decreases OT. Although OT is just one facet of overall efficiency, differences between learning and expert phases are evident in decreased length of stay, transfusions, and rates of revision surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 4S Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S139-S144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004265\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学习曲线(LC)是掌握一项新技术的过程。本研究评估了机器人辅助腹膜瓣性别确认阴道成形术(RPGAV)的LC。方法:回顾性分析2017年9月至2023年2月在单一中心连续接受RPGAV治疗的所有患者。分析手术时间(OT)来描述LC。确定OT稳定后的截断点,并用于比较围手术期和术后结果。结果:共行RPGAVs 500例。中位OT为125分钟(四分位数范围105-181),随着时间的推移显着下降。在OT中观察平台所需的最少病例数是300例患者。在调整LC后,有两个变量显著影响OT:与传统的多端口Xi机器人相比,体重指数增加1点使OT增加1.4分钟[95%可信区间(1.0,1.9),P < 0.001],单端口机器人减少OT 34分钟[95%可信区间1 (-43.1,-25.0),P < 0.001]。将前300例(学习阶段)与后200例(专家阶段)进行比较,专家阶段的住院时间、输血量和择期翻修手术率均较低。结论:在这个大队列中,RPGAV的LC为300例。患者身体质量指数导致OT的剂量反应增加,单端口机器人显著降低OT。虽然OT只是整体效率的一个方面,但学习阶段和专家阶段之间的差异在住院时间、输血量和翻修手术率的减少方面是明显的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the Learning Curve in Robotic Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty.

Background: The learning curve (LC) is the process of mastering a new technique. This study assesses the LC for robotic-assisted peritoneal flap gender-affirming vaginoplasty (RPGAV).

Methods: A retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients undergoing RPGAV between 09/2017 and 02/2023 at a single center was performed. Operative times (OT) were analyzed to describe the LC. A cutoff point was determined after which OT stabilized, and this was used to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Five hundred RPGAVs were performed. Median OT was 125 (interquartile range 105-181) minutes and decreased significantly over time. The minimum number of cases required to observe a plateau in OT is 300 patients.After adjusting for the LC, 2 variables significantly affected OT: a 1-point increase in body mass index increased OT by 1.4 minutes [95% confidence interval (1.0, 1.9), P < 0.001] and the single port robot decreased OT by 34 minutes [95% CI 1 (-43.1, -25.0), P < 0.001] as compared to the traditional multiport Xi robot.When comparing the first 300 cases (learning phase) to the last 200 (expert phase), length of stay, blood transfusions, and rates of elective revision surgery were lower in the expert phase.

Conclusions: The LC for RPGAV in this large cohort was 300 cases. Patient body mass index causes a dose-response increase in OT and the single port robot dramatically decreases OT. Although OT is just one facet of overall efficiency, differences between learning and expert phases are evident in decreased length of stay, transfusions, and rates of revision surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信