乳房感觉与生活质量:重建乳房皮肤敏感性与Breast - q评分的相关性。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ashley Zhang, Hao Huang, Marcos Lu Wang, Sophia Arbuiso, Grant G Black, Angela Ellison, David M Otterburn
{"title":"乳房感觉与生活质量:重建乳房皮肤敏感性与Breast - q评分的相关性。","authors":"Ashley Zhang, Hao Huang, Marcos Lu Wang, Sophia Arbuiso, Grant G Black, Angela Ellison, David M Otterburn","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired breast sensation can be a devastating consequence of mastectomy and breast reconstruction with significant impacts on quality of life. Few studies have examined the relationship between objective breast sensory results and patient-reported outcomes. Herein, we the relationship between cutaneous sensation of different anatomic regions of the breast and BREAST-Q scores in patients with autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with postmastectomy breast reconstruction completed the BREAST-Q and underwent breast sensory testing with a pressure-specified sensory device. BREAST-Q responses and sensation measurements were paired; any instance without both outcomes was dropped from the analysis. Univariate linear regression models assessed the relationship between sensation of various breast regions and BREAST-Q scores. Breast regions significant on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-four patients were included: 112 had autologous reconstruction and 82 had alloplastic reconstruction. In autologous patients, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensitivity was independently associated with higher Psychosocial Wellbeing [β = -0.20 (-0.36, -0.04); adjusted R2 = 0.09; P = 0.01] and Sexual Wellbeing scores [β = -0.26 (-0.46, -0.06); adjusted R2 = 0.05; P = 0.04]. Sensation in all areas of the breast was associated with higher Satisfaction with Breasts scores; these associations were not significant on multivariate analysis. In alloplastic patients, only NAC sensitivity was associated with Sexual Wellbeing scores [β = -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); R2 = 0.03; P = 0.002]. No other significant associations were observed between Breast Sensitivity and Psychosocial Wellbeing, Physical Wellbeing of the Chest, and Satisfaction with Breasts scores in the alloplastic cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC sensitivity significantly correlates with breast reconstruction patients' psychosocial and Sexual Wellbeing, particularly in patients undergoing neurotized autologous reconstruction, while overall breast sensitivity is associated with breast satisfaction. Weaker correlations in the alloplastic cohort suggest that breast sensitivity may play a more substantial role in patient-reported outcomes for patients receiving autologous reconstruction. These findings underscore the importance of restoring NAC sensation during breast reconstruction. Future research incorporating sensation-specific patient-reported outcome measures and examining additional sensory domains will further enhance our understanding of sensory recovery's impact on postreconstruction quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S276-S282"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast Sensation and Quality of Life: Correlating Cutaneous Sensitivity of the Reconstructed Breast and BREAST-Q Scores.\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Zhang, Hao Huang, Marcos Lu Wang, Sophia Arbuiso, Grant G Black, Angela Ellison, David M Otterburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impaired breast sensation can be a devastating consequence of mastectomy and breast reconstruction with significant impacts on quality of life. Few studies have examined the relationship between objective breast sensory results and patient-reported outcomes. Herein, we the relationship between cutaneous sensation of different anatomic regions of the breast and BREAST-Q scores in patients with autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with postmastectomy breast reconstruction completed the BREAST-Q and underwent breast sensory testing with a pressure-specified sensory device. BREAST-Q responses and sensation measurements were paired; any instance without both outcomes was dropped from the analysis. Univariate linear regression models assessed the relationship between sensation of various breast regions and BREAST-Q scores. Breast regions significant on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-four patients were included: 112 had autologous reconstruction and 82 had alloplastic reconstruction. In autologous patients, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensitivity was independently associated with higher Psychosocial Wellbeing [β = -0.20 (-0.36, -0.04); adjusted R2 = 0.09; P = 0.01] and Sexual Wellbeing scores [β = -0.26 (-0.46, -0.06); adjusted R2 = 0.05; P = 0.04]. Sensation in all areas of the breast was associated with higher Satisfaction with Breasts scores; these associations were not significant on multivariate analysis. In alloplastic patients, only NAC sensitivity was associated with Sexual Wellbeing scores [β = -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); R2 = 0.03; P = 0.002]. No other significant associations were observed between Breast Sensitivity and Psychosocial Wellbeing, Physical Wellbeing of the Chest, and Satisfaction with Breasts scores in the alloplastic cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC sensitivity significantly correlates with breast reconstruction patients' psychosocial and Sexual Wellbeing, particularly in patients undergoing neurotized autologous reconstruction, while overall breast sensitivity is associated with breast satisfaction. Weaker correlations in the alloplastic cohort suggest that breast sensitivity may play a more substantial role in patient-reported outcomes for patients receiving autologous reconstruction. These findings underscore the importance of restoring NAC sensation during breast reconstruction. Future research incorporating sensation-specific patient-reported outcome measures and examining additional sensory domains will further enhance our understanding of sensory recovery's impact on postreconstruction quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 4S Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S276-S282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004258\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004258","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳房感觉受损可能是乳房切除术和乳房重建的破坏性后果,对生活质量有重大影响。很少有研究调查了客观乳房感觉结果和患者报告的结果之间的关系。在此,我们研究了自体和同种异体乳房重建术患者乳腺不同解剖区域的皮肤感觉与breast - q评分的关系。方法:乳房切除术后乳房重建患者完成breast - q,并使用压力感应装置进行乳房感觉测试。BREAST-Q反应与感觉测量配对;任何没有这两个结果的实例都从分析中删除。单变量线性回归模型评估了乳房各区域感觉与breast - q评分之间的关系。在单因素分析中显著的乳房区域被纳入多元线性回归分析。结果:共194例患者,自体重建112例,同种异体重建82例。在自体患者中,乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)敏感性与较高的社会心理幸福感独立相关[β = -0.20 (-0.36, -0.04);调整后R2 = 0.09;P = 0.01]和性幸福感得分[β = -0.26 (-0.46, -0.06);调整后R2 = 0.05;P = 0.04]。乳房所有部位的感觉与乳房满意度得分较高相关;这些关联在多变量分析中不显著。在同种异体患者中,只有NAC敏感性与性健康评分相关[β = -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04);R2 = 0.03;P = 0.002]。在同种异体移植队列中,未观察到乳房敏感性与心理社会健康、胸部生理健康和乳房满意度评分之间的其他显著关联。结论:NAC敏感性与乳房再造术患者的社会心理和性健康显著相关,特别是在接受神经化自体再造术的患者中,而整体乳房敏感性与乳房满意度相关。同种异体移植队列中较弱的相关性表明,乳房敏感性可能在接受自体重建的患者报告的结果中发挥更大的作用。这些发现强调了在乳房重建过程中恢复NAC感觉的重要性。未来的研究将结合患者报告的感觉特异性结果测量和检查其他感觉域,将进一步增强我们对感觉恢复对建筑后生活质量影响的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breast Sensation and Quality of Life: Correlating Cutaneous Sensitivity of the Reconstructed Breast and BREAST-Q Scores.

Background: Impaired breast sensation can be a devastating consequence of mastectomy and breast reconstruction with significant impacts on quality of life. Few studies have examined the relationship between objective breast sensory results and patient-reported outcomes. Herein, we the relationship between cutaneous sensation of different anatomic regions of the breast and BREAST-Q scores in patients with autologous and alloplastic breast reconstruction.

Methods: Patients with postmastectomy breast reconstruction completed the BREAST-Q and underwent breast sensory testing with a pressure-specified sensory device. BREAST-Q responses and sensation measurements were paired; any instance without both outcomes was dropped from the analysis. Univariate linear regression models assessed the relationship between sensation of various breast regions and BREAST-Q scores. Breast regions significant on univariate analysis were included in a multivariate linear regression analysis.

Results: One hundred ninety-four patients were included: 112 had autologous reconstruction and 82 had alloplastic reconstruction. In autologous patients, nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sensitivity was independently associated with higher Psychosocial Wellbeing [β = -0.20 (-0.36, -0.04); adjusted R2 = 0.09; P = 0.01] and Sexual Wellbeing scores [β = -0.26 (-0.46, -0.06); adjusted R2 = 0.05; P = 0.04]. Sensation in all areas of the breast was associated with higher Satisfaction with Breasts scores; these associations were not significant on multivariate analysis. In alloplastic patients, only NAC sensitivity was associated with Sexual Wellbeing scores [β = -0.10 (-0.16, -0.04); R2 = 0.03; P = 0.002]. No other significant associations were observed between Breast Sensitivity and Psychosocial Wellbeing, Physical Wellbeing of the Chest, and Satisfaction with Breasts scores in the alloplastic cohort.

Conclusions: NAC sensitivity significantly correlates with breast reconstruction patients' psychosocial and Sexual Wellbeing, particularly in patients undergoing neurotized autologous reconstruction, while overall breast sensitivity is associated with breast satisfaction. Weaker correlations in the alloplastic cohort suggest that breast sensitivity may play a more substantial role in patient-reported outcomes for patients receiving autologous reconstruction. These findings underscore the importance of restoring NAC sensation during breast reconstruction. Future research incorporating sensation-specific patient-reported outcome measures and examining additional sensory domains will further enhance our understanding of sensory recovery's impact on postreconstruction quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信