Gloria D Coronado, Amanda F Petrik, Jamie H Thompson, Michael C Leo, Matthew Slaughter, Priyanka Gautom, Syed A Hussain, Leslie Mosso, Jeffrey Gibbs, Neha Yadav, Rajasekhara R Mummadi, Eric S Johnson, Ricardo Jimenez
{"title":"患者导航改善异常大便检查结果后结肠镜检查完成：一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Gloria D Coronado, Amanda F Petrik, Jamie H Thompson, Michael C Leo, Matthew Slaughter, Priyanka Gautom, Syed A Hussain, Leslie Mosso, Jeffrey Gibbs, Neha Yadav, Rajasekhara R Mummadi, Eric S Johnson, Ricardo Jimenez","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-01885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient navigation is a recommended practice of the Guide to Community Preventive Services; little is known about whether it improves colonoscopy completion for adults who have received an abnormal stool test result.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether patient navigation delivered to persons with an abnormal stool test result increased follow-up colonoscopy completion (primary) at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03925883).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A federally qualified health center (<i>n</i> = 32 clinics) in Washington state.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Persons aged 50 to 75 years with an abnormal fecal test result in the prior month.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A 6-topic, telephone-based patient navigation program delivered by bilingual (English and Spanish) clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Receipt of follow-up colonoscopy at 1 year (primary); time to colonoscopy receipt (secondary); and program effectiveness by patient characteristics, including patients' probability of obtaining a colonoscopy without navigation, derived using health record data (secondary).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 985 participants enrolled (mean age, 61 years [SD, 6.8]; 170 [18%] had a Spanish-language preference listed in the medical record), 967 were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis (479 in patient navigation, 488 in usual care). Receipt of follow-up colonoscopy was higher in the patient navigation group than in the usual care group (55.1% vs. 42.1%; risk difference, 13.0 percentage points [95% CI, 6.5 to 19.4 percentage points]). The intervention effect was not moderated by patients' probability of obtaining a colonoscopy without navigation.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The study was primarily done during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, which created additional barriers to colonoscopy at the health system and patient levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the effectiveness of patient navigation for follow-up colonoscopy completion.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Cancer Institute.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"645-654"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Navigation to Improve Colonoscopy Completion After an Abnormal Stool Test Result : A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Gloria D Coronado, Amanda F Petrik, Jamie H Thompson, Michael C Leo, Matthew Slaughter, Priyanka Gautom, Syed A Hussain, Leslie Mosso, Jeffrey Gibbs, Neha Yadav, Rajasekhara R Mummadi, Eric S Johnson, Ricardo Jimenez\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-01885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient navigation is a recommended practice of the Guide to Community Preventive Services; little is known about whether it improves colonoscopy completion for adults who have received an abnormal stool test result.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether patient navigation delivered to persons with an abnormal stool test result increased follow-up colonoscopy completion (primary) at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03925883).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A federally qualified health center (<i>n</i> = 32 clinics) in Washington state.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Persons aged 50 to 75 years with an abnormal fecal test result in the prior month.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>A 6-topic, telephone-based patient navigation program delivered by bilingual (English and Spanish) clinical staff.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Receipt of follow-up colonoscopy at 1 year (primary); time to colonoscopy receipt (secondary); and program effectiveness by patient characteristics, including patients' probability of obtaining a colonoscopy without navigation, derived using health record data (secondary).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 985 participants enrolled (mean age, 61 years [SD, 6.8]; 170 [18%] had a Spanish-language preference listed in the medical record), 967 were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis (479 in patient navigation, 488 in usual care). Receipt of follow-up colonoscopy was higher in the patient navigation group than in the usual care group (55.1% vs. 42.1%; risk difference, 13.0 percentage points [95% CI, 6.5 to 19.4 percentage points]). The intervention effect was not moderated by patients' probability of obtaining a colonoscopy without navigation.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>The study was primarily done during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, which created additional barriers to colonoscopy at the health system and patient levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings support the effectiveness of patient navigation for follow-up colonoscopy completion.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Cancer Institute.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"645-654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01885\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-01885","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Navigation to Improve Colonoscopy Completion After an Abnormal Stool Test Result : A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Background: Patient navigation is a recommended practice of the Guide to Community Preventive Services; little is known about whether it improves colonoscopy completion for adults who have received an abnormal stool test result.
Objective: To determine whether patient navigation delivered to persons with an abnormal stool test result increased follow-up colonoscopy completion (primary) at 1 year.
Setting: A federally qualified health center (n = 32 clinics) in Washington state.
Patients: Persons aged 50 to 75 years with an abnormal fecal test result in the prior month.
Intervention: A 6-topic, telephone-based patient navigation program delivered by bilingual (English and Spanish) clinical staff.
Measurements: Receipt of follow-up colonoscopy at 1 year (primary); time to colonoscopy receipt (secondary); and program effectiveness by patient characteristics, including patients' probability of obtaining a colonoscopy without navigation, derived using health record data (secondary).
Results: Of 985 participants enrolled (mean age, 61 years [SD, 6.8]; 170 [18%] had a Spanish-language preference listed in the medical record), 967 were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis (479 in patient navigation, 488 in usual care). Receipt of follow-up colonoscopy was higher in the patient navigation group than in the usual care group (55.1% vs. 42.1%; risk difference, 13.0 percentage points [95% CI, 6.5 to 19.4 percentage points]). The intervention effect was not moderated by patients' probability of obtaining a colonoscopy without navigation.
Limitation: The study was primarily done during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, which created additional barriers to colonoscopy at the health system and patient levels.
Conclusion: These findings support the effectiveness of patient navigation for follow-up colonoscopy completion.
Primary funding source: National Cancer Institute.
期刊介绍：
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
