性别作为一个生物学变量:当代视角。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Fatima Farrukh MD, Richard C. Becker MD
{"title":"性别作为一个生物学变量:当代视角。","authors":"Fatima Farrukh MD,&nbsp;Richard C. Becker MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) in biomedical research is essential to enhancing the translational relevance of scientific findings and ensuring equitable healthcare for both sexes. Despite policy advancements, disparities persist in the integration of SABV across research domains, particularly in cardiovascular disease, where presentation and treatment responses vary by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review synthesizes current literature and policy frameworks, including the NIH SABV mandate, to evaluate progress in SABV implementation. It also examines the roles of key stakeholders—funding agencies, publishers, and the pharmaceutical industry—in promoting or hindering SABV integration in preclinical and clinical research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis reveals variable adherence to SABV policies, with persistent gaps in both study design and reporting. Case studies in cardiovascular research illustrate the consequences of SABV neglect, such as misdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment strategies. Positive shifts are observed in areas with strong policy enforcement and targeted funding incentives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Effective integration of SABV is critical for scientific rigor and healthcare equity. Strategies such as mandatory researcher training, policy accountability measures, and increased sex-disaggregated data reporting are needed. Emphasizing SABV in clinical trial design and analysis will help foster a more inclusive research environment and improve health outcomes for all.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"287 ","pages":"Pages 10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex as a biological variable: a contemporary perspective\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Farrukh MD,&nbsp;Richard C. Becker MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) in biomedical research is essential to enhancing the translational relevance of scientific findings and ensuring equitable healthcare for both sexes. Despite policy advancements, disparities persist in the integration of SABV across research domains, particularly in cardiovascular disease, where presentation and treatment responses vary by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review synthesizes current literature and policy frameworks, including the NIH SABV mandate, to evaluate progress in SABV implementation. It also examines the roles of key stakeholders—funding agencies, publishers, and the pharmaceutical industry—in promoting or hindering SABV integration in preclinical and clinical research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis reveals variable adherence to SABV policies, with persistent gaps in both study design and reporting. Case studies in cardiovascular research illustrate the consequences of SABV neglect, such as misdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment strategies. Positive shifts are observed in areas with strong policy enforcement and targeted funding incentives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Effective integration of SABV is critical for scientific rigor and healthcare equity. Strategies such as mandatory researcher training, policy accountability measures, and increased sex-disaggregated data reporting are needed. Emphasizing SABV in clinical trial design and analysis will help foster a more inclusive research environment and improve health outcomes for all.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"287 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇综述讨论了将性别作为生物变量(SABV)纳入生物医学研究的重要性,以提高研究结果的转化价值,并改善两性的医疗保健结果。我们回顾了基础政策,如NIH SABV授权,并评估了将SABV整合到临床前和临床研究中的进展。通过强调心血管疾病表现和治疗反应的差异,以及资助机构、出版商和制药行业的关键作用,我们强调了SABV对公平和有效医疗保健的必要性。提出了推进SABV整合的战略,包括强制性培训、政策执行和临床试验参与,以营造一个优先考虑包容性和科学严谨性的研究环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex as a biological variable: a contemporary perspective

Background

Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) in biomedical research is essential to enhancing the translational relevance of scientific findings and ensuring equitable healthcare for both sexes. Despite policy advancements, disparities persist in the integration of SABV across research domains, particularly in cardiovascular disease, where presentation and treatment responses vary by sex.

Methods

This review synthesizes current literature and policy frameworks, including the NIH SABV mandate, to evaluate progress in SABV implementation. It also examines the roles of key stakeholders—funding agencies, publishers, and the pharmaceutical industry—in promoting or hindering SABV integration in preclinical and clinical research.

Results

Analysis reveals variable adherence to SABV policies, with persistent gaps in both study design and reporting. Case studies in cardiovascular research illustrate the consequences of SABV neglect, such as misdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment strategies. Positive shifts are observed in areas with strong policy enforcement and targeted funding incentives.

Conclusions

Effective integration of SABV is critical for scientific rigor and healthcare equity. Strategies such as mandatory researcher training, policy accountability measures, and increased sex-disaggregated data reporting are needed. Emphasizing SABV in clinical trial design and analysis will help foster a more inclusive research environment and improve health outcomes for all.

Trial Registration

Not applicable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信