{"title":"性别作为一个生物学变量:当代视角。","authors":"Fatima Farrukh MD, Richard C. Becker MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) in biomedical research is essential to enhancing the translational relevance of scientific findings and ensuring equitable healthcare for both sexes. Despite policy advancements, disparities persist in the integration of SABV across research domains, particularly in cardiovascular disease, where presentation and treatment responses vary by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review synthesizes current literature and policy frameworks, including the NIH SABV mandate, to evaluate progress in SABV implementation. It also examines the roles of key stakeholders—funding agencies, publishers, and the pharmaceutical industry—in promoting or hindering SABV integration in preclinical and clinical research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis reveals variable adherence to SABV policies, with persistent gaps in both study design and reporting. Case studies in cardiovascular research illustrate the consequences of SABV neglect, such as misdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment strategies. Positive shifts are observed in areas with strong policy enforcement and targeted funding incentives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Effective integration of SABV is critical for scientific rigor and healthcare equity. Strategies such as mandatory researcher training, policy accountability measures, and increased sex-disaggregated data reporting are needed. Emphasizing SABV in clinical trial design and analysis will help foster a more inclusive research environment and improve health outcomes for all.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"287 ","pages":"Pages 10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex as a biological variable: a contemporary perspective\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Farrukh MD, Richard C. Becker MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2025.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) in biomedical research is essential to enhancing the translational relevance of scientific findings and ensuring equitable healthcare for both sexes. Despite policy advancements, disparities persist in the integration of SABV across research domains, particularly in cardiovascular disease, where presentation and treatment responses vary by sex.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review synthesizes current literature and policy frameworks, including the NIH SABV mandate, to evaluate progress in SABV implementation. It also examines the roles of key stakeholders—funding agencies, publishers, and the pharmaceutical industry—in promoting or hindering SABV integration in preclinical and clinical research.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis reveals variable adherence to SABV policies, with persistent gaps in both study design and reporting. Case studies in cardiovascular research illustrate the consequences of SABV neglect, such as misdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment strategies. Positive shifts are observed in areas with strong policy enforcement and targeted funding incentives.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Effective integration of SABV is critical for scientific rigor and healthcare equity. Strategies such as mandatory researcher training, policy accountability measures, and increased sex-disaggregated data reporting are needed. Emphasizing SABV in clinical trial design and analysis will help foster a more inclusive research environment and improve health outcomes for all.</div></div><div><h3>Trial Registration</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"287 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000948\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870325000948","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sex as a biological variable: a contemporary perspective
Background
Incorporating sex as a biological variable (SABV) in biomedical research is essential to enhancing the translational relevance of scientific findings and ensuring equitable healthcare for both sexes. Despite policy advancements, disparities persist in the integration of SABV across research domains, particularly in cardiovascular disease, where presentation and treatment responses vary by sex.
Methods
This review synthesizes current literature and policy frameworks, including the NIH SABV mandate, to evaluate progress in SABV implementation. It also examines the roles of key stakeholders—funding agencies, publishers, and the pharmaceutical industry—in promoting or hindering SABV integration in preclinical and clinical research.
Results
Analysis reveals variable adherence to SABV policies, with persistent gaps in both study design and reporting. Case studies in cardiovascular research illustrate the consequences of SABV neglect, such as misdiagnosis and suboptimal treatment strategies. Positive shifts are observed in areas with strong policy enforcement and targeted funding incentives.
Conclusions
Effective integration of SABV is critical for scientific rigor and healthcare equity. Strategies such as mandatory researcher training, policy accountability measures, and increased sex-disaggregated data reporting are needed. Emphasizing SABV in clinical trial design and analysis will help foster a more inclusive research environment and improve health outcomes for all.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.