肿瘤保乳手术后肿瘤与乳房体积比及预后。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Casey Zhang, Alberto Vera, Kelly Murphy, Michael Calcaterra, Vanessa Mroueh, Hamid Alhmari, Carolyn De La Cruz, Michael L Gimbel, Vu T Nguyen, John Austin Vargo, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Brodie A Parent
{"title":"肿瘤保乳手术后肿瘤与乳房体积比及预后。","authors":"Casey Zhang, Alberto Vera, Kelly Murphy, Michael Calcaterra, Vanessa Mroueh, Hamid Alhmari, Carolyn De La Cruz, Michael L Gimbel, Vu T Nguyen, John Austin Vargo, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Brodie A Parent","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) can offer oncologically safe and cosmetically satisfying results for patients with breast cancer. However, the relative oncologic safety of high tumor-volume oncoplastic resections is largely unknown. This study investigated the association between tumor-to-breast volume ratio, recurrence, and surgical complications in OBCS. The relationship between tumor-to-breast ratio and quality of life was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for all women who underwent OBCS for breast cancer between 2010 and 2023 at a university-based tertiary referral center. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was utilized to assess quality of life outcomes. Tumor-to-breast ratio was calculated by dividing lumpectomy specimen volume by total breast volume. Surgical complications, reexcision, local recurrence, and revision procedures were noted. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association of tumor-to-breast ratio with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 192 patients, of which 65 (34%) completed the BREAST-Q. Median tumor-to-breast volume ratio was 7.3% (IQR, 3.6%-12.5%). Quartiles of tumor-to-breast ratio were not associated with local cancer recurrence rate (P = 0.50), reexcision (P = 0.29), wound-related complications (P = 0.45), complications requiring reoperation (P = 0.34), and elective revision of reconstruction (P = 0.67). BREAST-Q scores for Psychosocial Well-being, Physical Well-being, and Overall Satisfaction were similar across tumor-to-breast ratio. Cancer worry was significantly higher in larger tumor-breast ratio quartiles (P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that OBCS is a reasonable approach for patients with higher tumor-to-breast ratio. Complications and quality of life metrics did not appear to vary significantly with increasing tumor size, except for \"cancer worry,\" which was higher among patients with larger tumor-breast ratio patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S297-S304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor-to-Breast Volume Ratio and Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Casey Zhang, Alberto Vera, Kelly Murphy, Michael Calcaterra, Vanessa Mroueh, Hamid Alhmari, Carolyn De La Cruz, Michael L Gimbel, Vu T Nguyen, John Austin Vargo, Priscilla F McAuliffe, Brodie A Parent\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) can offer oncologically safe and cosmetically satisfying results for patients with breast cancer. However, the relative oncologic safety of high tumor-volume oncoplastic resections is largely unknown. This study investigated the association between tumor-to-breast volume ratio, recurrence, and surgical complications in OBCS. The relationship between tumor-to-breast ratio and quality of life was also assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed for all women who underwent OBCS for breast cancer between 2010 and 2023 at a university-based tertiary referral center. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was utilized to assess quality of life outcomes. Tumor-to-breast ratio was calculated by dividing lumpectomy specimen volume by total breast volume. Surgical complications, reexcision, local recurrence, and revision procedures were noted. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association of tumor-to-breast ratio with outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 192 patients, of which 65 (34%) completed the BREAST-Q. Median tumor-to-breast volume ratio was 7.3% (IQR, 3.6%-12.5%). Quartiles of tumor-to-breast ratio were not associated with local cancer recurrence rate (P = 0.50), reexcision (P = 0.29), wound-related complications (P = 0.45), complications requiring reoperation (P = 0.34), and elective revision of reconstruction (P = 0.67). BREAST-Q scores for Psychosocial Well-being, Physical Well-being, and Overall Satisfaction were similar across tumor-to-breast ratio. Cancer worry was significantly higher in larger tumor-breast ratio quartiles (P = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data suggest that OBCS is a reasonable approach for patients with higher tumor-to-breast ratio. Complications and quality of life metrics did not appear to vary significantly with increasing tumor size, except for \\\"cancer worry,\\\" which was higher among patients with larger tumor-breast ratio patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 4S Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S297-S304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004288\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004288","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肿瘤保乳手术(OBCS)可以为乳腺癌患者提供肿瘤安全且美容满意的结果。然而,高肿瘤体积肿瘤切除术的相对肿瘤学安全性在很大程度上是未知的。本研究探讨了肿瘤与乳腺体积比、复发和手术并发症之间的关系。还评估了肿瘤与乳房比例与生活质量之间的关系。方法:对2010年至2023年间在大学三级转诊中心接受乳腺癌OBCS治疗的所有女性进行回顾性研究。使用BREAST-Q问卷评估生活质量结果。肿瘤与乳房的比值由乳房肿瘤切除标本体积除以乳房总体积计算。记录了手术并发症、再切除、局部复发和翻修手术。采用多变量logistic回归来评估肿瘤与乳房比例与预后的关系。结果:本研究纳入192例患者,其中65例(34%)完成了BREAST-Q检查。中位肿瘤与乳腺体积比为7.3% (IQR, 3.6%-12.5%)。肿瘤与乳房比例的四分位数与局部肿瘤复发率(P = 0.50)、再切除(P = 0.29)、伤口相关并发症(P = 0.45)、需要再手术的并发症(P = 0.34)和选择性重建翻修(P = 0.67)无关。乳房-心理健康、身体健康和总体满意度的BREAST-Q分数在肿瘤-乳房比例中相似。肿瘤与乳房比例越高,对癌症的担忧程度越高(P = 0.03)。结论:这些数据表明,对于肿瘤与乳房比例较高的患者,OBCS是一种合理的方法。并发症和生活质量指标似乎没有随着肿瘤大小的增加而显著变化,除了“癌症担忧”,在肿瘤与乳房比例较大的患者中,这种担忧更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumor-to-Breast Volume Ratio and Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery.

Introduction: Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) can offer oncologically safe and cosmetically satisfying results for patients with breast cancer. However, the relative oncologic safety of high tumor-volume oncoplastic resections is largely unknown. This study investigated the association between tumor-to-breast volume ratio, recurrence, and surgical complications in OBCS. The relationship between tumor-to-breast ratio and quality of life was also assessed.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all women who underwent OBCS for breast cancer between 2010 and 2023 at a university-based tertiary referral center. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was utilized to assess quality of life outcomes. Tumor-to-breast ratio was calculated by dividing lumpectomy specimen volume by total breast volume. Surgical complications, reexcision, local recurrence, and revision procedures were noted. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the association of tumor-to-breast ratio with outcomes.

Results: This study included 192 patients, of which 65 (34%) completed the BREAST-Q. Median tumor-to-breast volume ratio was 7.3% (IQR, 3.6%-12.5%). Quartiles of tumor-to-breast ratio were not associated with local cancer recurrence rate (P = 0.50), reexcision (P = 0.29), wound-related complications (P = 0.45), complications requiring reoperation (P = 0.34), and elective revision of reconstruction (P = 0.67). BREAST-Q scores for Psychosocial Well-being, Physical Well-being, and Overall Satisfaction were similar across tumor-to-breast ratio. Cancer worry was significantly higher in larger tumor-breast ratio quartiles (P = 0.03).

Conclusions: These data suggest that OBCS is a reasonable approach for patients with higher tumor-to-breast ratio. Complications and quality of life metrics did not appear to vary significantly with increasing tumor size, except for "cancer worry," which was higher among patients with larger tumor-breast ratio patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信