分期假体乳房重建后辅助手术的发展趋势。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annie B McVeigh, Matthew J Heron, Zachary H Zamore, Carisa M Cooney, Kristen P Broderick
{"title":"分期假体乳房重建后辅助手术的发展趋势。","authors":"Annie B McVeigh, Matthew J Heron, Zachary H Zamore, Carisa M Cooney, Kristen P Broderick","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shift from submuscular to prepectoral breast reconstruction has contributed to anecdotal changes in practices around ancillary procedures, such as autologous fat grafting and nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. Although prepectoral reconstruction carries a lesser risk for muscular injury, postoperative pain and animation deformity, it is associated with decreased soft-tissue coverage and may necessitate ancillary procedures. This study examines operative trends following staged implant-based breast reconstruction to determine if tissue expander (TE) plane is associated with changes in the utilization of supplemental procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review using the TriNetX research database of deidentified patient data. Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, we identified adult female patients who underwent (1) mastectomy, (2) TE placement between 2013 and 2020, and (3) implant exchange. We grouped patients by year of TE placement and collected postimplant procedure characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10,984 patients who underwent TE placement between 2013 and 2020 and subsequent implant exchange. There were 854 patients in the 2013 cohort and 1634 in the 2020 cohort. Fat grafting was 2.76-fold more prevalent in the 2020 cohort compared to the 2013 cohort (43.0% vs 15.6%, P < 0.001). Notably, the percentage of patients undergoing more than one round of fat grafting increased from 4.1% in the 2013 cohort to 11.9% in the 2020 cohort (P < 0.001). Fat grafting at the time of implant exchange was also more common in later cohorts, increasing from 6.6% of patients in the 2013 cohort to 32.0% in the 2020 cohort (P < 0.001). Over the study period, rates of NAC reconstruction were observed to decrease. A total of 10.3% of patients in the 2020 cohort underwent NAC reconstruction compared to 24.6% in the 2013 cohort (P < 0.001). Nipple tattooing procedures were also performed less frequently in recent cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In more recent cohorts, procedures aimed at correcting contour irregularities and rippling, specifically autologous fat grafting, have become more common. In contrast, the rates of NAC reconstruction and nipple tattooing have decreased, possibly because of challenges related to thin mastectomy skin flaps and limited soft-tissue coverage, which are more common in prepectoral reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"94 4S Suppl 2","pages":"S168-S172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Ancillary Procedures Following Staged Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Annie B McVeigh, Matthew J Heron, Zachary H Zamore, Carisa M Cooney, Kristen P Broderick\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shift from submuscular to prepectoral breast reconstruction has contributed to anecdotal changes in practices around ancillary procedures, such as autologous fat grafting and nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. Although prepectoral reconstruction carries a lesser risk for muscular injury, postoperative pain and animation deformity, it is associated with decreased soft-tissue coverage and may necessitate ancillary procedures. This study examines operative trends following staged implant-based breast reconstruction to determine if tissue expander (TE) plane is associated with changes in the utilization of supplemental procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review using the TriNetX research database of deidentified patient data. Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, we identified adult female patients who underwent (1) mastectomy, (2) TE placement between 2013 and 2020, and (3) implant exchange. We grouped patients by year of TE placement and collected postimplant procedure characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 10,984 patients who underwent TE placement between 2013 and 2020 and subsequent implant exchange. There were 854 patients in the 2013 cohort and 1634 in the 2020 cohort. Fat grafting was 2.76-fold more prevalent in the 2020 cohort compared to the 2013 cohort (43.0% vs 15.6%, P < 0.001). Notably, the percentage of patients undergoing more than one round of fat grafting increased from 4.1% in the 2013 cohort to 11.9% in the 2020 cohort (P < 0.001). Fat grafting at the time of implant exchange was also more common in later cohorts, increasing from 6.6% of patients in the 2013 cohort to 32.0% in the 2020 cohort (P < 0.001). Over the study period, rates of NAC reconstruction were observed to decrease. A total of 10.3% of patients in the 2020 cohort underwent NAC reconstruction compared to 24.6% in the 2013 cohort (P < 0.001). Nipple tattooing procedures were also performed less frequently in recent cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In more recent cohorts, procedures aimed at correcting contour irregularities and rippling, specifically autologous fat grafting, have become more common. In contrast, the rates of NAC reconstruction and nipple tattooing have decreased, possibly because of challenges related to thin mastectomy skin flaps and limited soft-tissue coverage, which are more common in prepectoral reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"94 4S Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"S168-S172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004313\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从肌下乳房重建到乳前乳房重建的转变导致了辅助手术实践的轶事变化,如自体脂肪移植和乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)重建。尽管胸前重建的肌肉损伤、术后疼痛和运动畸形的风险较小,但它与软组织覆盖减少有关,可能需要辅助手术。本研究探讨了分期假体乳房重建后的手术趋势,以确定组织扩张器(TE)平面是否与补充手术的使用变化有关。方法:我们使用TriNetX研究数据库对未识别的患者数据进行回顾性分析。使用现行程序术语代码,我们确定了接受(1)乳房切除术,(2)2013年至2020年之间TE放置和(3)植入物置换的成年女性患者。我们按TE放置年份对患者进行分组,并收集植入后的手术特征。结果:我们确定了10,984例在2013年至2020年期间接受TE放置和随后的植入物置换的患者。2013年队列中有854名患者,2020年队列中有1634名患者。与2013年队列相比,2020年队列中脂肪移植的患病率为2.76倍(43.0% vs 15.6%, P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,接受一轮以上脂肪移植的患者比例从2013年队列的4.1%增加到2020年队列的11.9% (P < 0.001)。在之后的队列中,植入物置换时进行脂肪移植的患者也更为常见,从2013年队列的6.6%增加到2020年队列的32.0% (P < 0.001)。在研究期间,观察到NAC重建率下降。在2020年队列中,10.3%的患者接受了NAC重建,而2013年队列中这一比例为24.6% (P < 0.001)。在最近的队列中,乳头纹身手术也较少进行。结论:在最近的队列中,旨在纠正轮廓不规则和波纹的手术,特别是自体脂肪移植,已经变得越来越普遍。相比之下,NAC重建和乳头纹身的比例有所下降,可能是因为乳房切除术皮瓣薄和软组织覆盖有限的挑战,这在乳房前重建中更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Ancillary Procedures Following Staged Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Background: The shift from submuscular to prepectoral breast reconstruction has contributed to anecdotal changes in practices around ancillary procedures, such as autologous fat grafting and nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. Although prepectoral reconstruction carries a lesser risk for muscular injury, postoperative pain and animation deformity, it is associated with decreased soft-tissue coverage and may necessitate ancillary procedures. This study examines operative trends following staged implant-based breast reconstruction to determine if tissue expander (TE) plane is associated with changes in the utilization of supplemental procedures.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review using the TriNetX research database of deidentified patient data. Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, we identified adult female patients who underwent (1) mastectomy, (2) TE placement between 2013 and 2020, and (3) implant exchange. We grouped patients by year of TE placement and collected postimplant procedure characteristics.

Results: We identified 10,984 patients who underwent TE placement between 2013 and 2020 and subsequent implant exchange. There were 854 patients in the 2013 cohort and 1634 in the 2020 cohort. Fat grafting was 2.76-fold more prevalent in the 2020 cohort compared to the 2013 cohort (43.0% vs 15.6%, P < 0.001). Notably, the percentage of patients undergoing more than one round of fat grafting increased from 4.1% in the 2013 cohort to 11.9% in the 2020 cohort (P < 0.001). Fat grafting at the time of implant exchange was also more common in later cohorts, increasing from 6.6% of patients in the 2013 cohort to 32.0% in the 2020 cohort (P < 0.001). Over the study period, rates of NAC reconstruction were observed to decrease. A total of 10.3% of patients in the 2020 cohort underwent NAC reconstruction compared to 24.6% in the 2013 cohort (P < 0.001). Nipple tattooing procedures were also performed less frequently in recent cohorts.

Conclusions: In more recent cohorts, procedures aimed at correcting contour irregularities and rippling, specifically autologous fat grafting, have become more common. In contrast, the rates of NAC reconstruction and nipple tattooing have decreased, possibly because of challenges related to thin mastectomy skin flaps and limited soft-tissue coverage, which are more common in prepectoral reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信