毒理学研究中的微采样-最大化科学,商业和3r优势。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicology Research Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/toxres/tfaf045
Helen Prior, Adeyemi O Adedeji, Romalie Allen, Derek Angus, Daniel Baker, Hollie Blunt, David Coleman, Helen-Marie Dunmore, Elisa Passini, Tara Putnam, Marie-Luce Rosseels, Neil Spooner, Jane Stewart, Carol Strepka, Alan Stokes, Tom Verhaeghe, Amanda Wilson, Fiona Sewell
{"title":"毒理学研究中的微采样-最大化科学,商业和3r优势。","authors":"Helen Prior, Adeyemi O Adedeji, Romalie Allen, Derek Angus, Daniel Baker, Hollie Blunt, David Coleman, Helen-Marie Dunmore, Elisa Passini, Tara Putnam, Marie-Luce Rosseels, Neil Spooner, Jane Stewart, Carol Strepka, Alan Stokes, Tom Verhaeghe, Amanda Wilson, Fiona Sewell","doi":"10.1093/toxres/tfaf045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adoption of a blood microsampling technique can reduce or avoid the use of satellite animals (rodents) for toxicokinetics or other purposes in discovery and toxicology studies and provides refinements applicable for both rodents and larger animals. Microsampling can increase the scientific value of data obtained from rodent studies during drug and (agro)chemical development, enabling multiple endpoints to be investigated and compared in an individual animal in the same way as non-rodents. A cross-sector survey was developed to understand the current use of microsampling in toxicology studies, with the aim of identifying the specific studies in which microsampling was employed and the barriers to wider uptake. A high proportion of the survey responses indicated that microsampling was used, however, the extent varied widely. Some organisations use the technique only in non-GLP studies. Microsampling was used most for pharmacokinetics or toxicokinetics, commonly within small molecule and agrochemical toxicity studies, but less frequently within large molecule, cell/gene therapies or industrial chemical studies. A wide variety of barriers to wider use of microsampling were provided, typically around reticence to change from using larger samples, or not wishing to validate another bioanalytical method given the resources and challenges associated with the validation of a new technology. Despite these barriers, some organisations have adopted microsampling routinely across many/all rodent toxicity studies and there are opportunities to further reduce and refine animal use across all sectors by wider adoption of microsampling.</p>","PeriodicalId":105,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Research","volume":"14 2","pages":"tfaf045"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microsampling in toxicology studies - maximising the scientific, business and 3Rs advantages.\",\"authors\":\"Helen Prior, Adeyemi O Adedeji, Romalie Allen, Derek Angus, Daniel Baker, Hollie Blunt, David Coleman, Helen-Marie Dunmore, Elisa Passini, Tara Putnam, Marie-Luce Rosseels, Neil Spooner, Jane Stewart, Carol Strepka, Alan Stokes, Tom Verhaeghe, Amanda Wilson, Fiona Sewell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/toxres/tfaf045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adoption of a blood microsampling technique can reduce or avoid the use of satellite animals (rodents) for toxicokinetics or other purposes in discovery and toxicology studies and provides refinements applicable for both rodents and larger animals. Microsampling can increase the scientific value of data obtained from rodent studies during drug and (agro)chemical development, enabling multiple endpoints to be investigated and compared in an individual animal in the same way as non-rodents. A cross-sector survey was developed to understand the current use of microsampling in toxicology studies, with the aim of identifying the specific studies in which microsampling was employed and the barriers to wider uptake. A high proportion of the survey responses indicated that microsampling was used, however, the extent varied widely. Some organisations use the technique only in non-GLP studies. Microsampling was used most for pharmacokinetics or toxicokinetics, commonly within small molecule and agrochemical toxicity studies, but less frequently within large molecule, cell/gene therapies or industrial chemical studies. A wide variety of barriers to wider use of microsampling were provided, typically around reticence to change from using larger samples, or not wishing to validate another bioanalytical method given the resources and challenges associated with the validation of a new technology. Despite these barriers, some organisations have adopted microsampling routinely across many/all rodent toxicity studies and there are opportunities to further reduce and refine animal use across all sectors by wider adoption of microsampling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology Research\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"tfaf045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfaf045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfaf045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用血液微采样技术可以减少或避免在发现和毒理学研究中使用卫星动物(啮齿动物)进行毒性动力学或其他目的,并提供适用于啮齿动物和大型动物的改进。微采样可以增加在药物和(农业)化学开发期间从啮齿动物研究中获得的数据的科学价值,使单个动物的多个端点能够以与非啮齿动物相同的方式进行调查和比较。开展了一项跨部门调查,以了解目前在毒理学研究中使用微采样的情况,目的是确定采用微采样的具体研究以及广泛采用微采样的障碍。很高比例的调查答复表明使用了微抽样,但是,其程度差别很大。一些组织只在非glp研究中使用该技术。微采样主要用于药代动力学或毒性动力学,通常用于小分子和农用化学品毒性研究,但较少用于大分子、细胞/基因治疗或工业化学研究。广泛使用微采样存在各种各样的障碍,通常是围绕使用更大样本的沉默,或者考虑到与新技术验证相关的资源和挑战,不希望验证另一种生物分析方法。尽管存在这些障碍,一些组织已经在许多/所有啮齿动物毒性研究中常规采用了微采样,并且通过更广泛地采用微采样,有机会进一步减少和改进所有部门的动物使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microsampling in toxicology studies - maximising the scientific, business and 3Rs advantages.

Adoption of a blood microsampling technique can reduce or avoid the use of satellite animals (rodents) for toxicokinetics or other purposes in discovery and toxicology studies and provides refinements applicable for both rodents and larger animals. Microsampling can increase the scientific value of data obtained from rodent studies during drug and (agro)chemical development, enabling multiple endpoints to be investigated and compared in an individual animal in the same way as non-rodents. A cross-sector survey was developed to understand the current use of microsampling in toxicology studies, with the aim of identifying the specific studies in which microsampling was employed and the barriers to wider uptake. A high proportion of the survey responses indicated that microsampling was used, however, the extent varied widely. Some organisations use the technique only in non-GLP studies. Microsampling was used most for pharmacokinetics or toxicokinetics, commonly within small molecule and agrochemical toxicity studies, but less frequently within large molecule, cell/gene therapies or industrial chemical studies. A wide variety of barriers to wider use of microsampling were provided, typically around reticence to change from using larger samples, or not wishing to validate another bioanalytical method given the resources and challenges associated with the validation of a new technology. Despite these barriers, some organisations have adopted microsampling routinely across many/all rodent toxicity studies and there are opportunities to further reduce and refine animal use across all sectors by wider adoption of microsampling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology Research
Toxicology Research TOXICOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: A multi-disciplinary journal covering the best research in both fundamental and applied aspects of toxicology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信