优于无风险:准备金溢价和银行贷款

IF 2.6 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Raymond Kim
{"title":"优于无风险:准备金溢价和银行贷款","authors":"Raymond Kim","doi":"10.1111/fire.12421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When the Federal Reserve first paid interest on excess reserves (IOER) in October 2008, banks faced a choice to earn a “better than” risk-free rate, or lend to earn a higher, riskier rate. Evidence suggests the “reserves-lending puzzle” is not driven by endogeneity from reverse causality, flight to safety, or increased Treasury supply, but by the introduction of the “reserve premium” (IOER-3MT), which is associated with a reduction of domestic bank-level lending by -5.1% (-$420.2B). Findings suggest the reserves risk channel can aid in restricting inflation. Additionally, recent Senior Financial Officer Surveys corroborate the conclusions presented in this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":47617,"journal":{"name":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","volume":"60 2","pages":"541-571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fire.12421","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better than risk-free: Reserve premiums and bank lending\",\"authors\":\"Raymond Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/fire.12421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>When the Federal Reserve first paid interest on excess reserves (IOER) in October 2008, banks faced a choice to earn a “better than” risk-free rate, or lend to earn a higher, riskier rate. Evidence suggests the “reserves-lending puzzle” is not driven by endogeneity from reverse causality, flight to safety, or increased Treasury supply, but by the introduction of the “reserve premium” (IOER-3MT), which is associated with a reduction of domestic bank-level lending by -5.1% (-$420.2B). Findings suggest the reserves risk channel can aid in restricting inflation. Additionally, recent Senior Financial Officer Surveys corroborate the conclusions presented in this paper.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"60 2\",\"pages\":\"541-571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/fire.12421\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FINANCIAL REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FINANCIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fire.12421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当美联储在2008年10月首次对超额准备金(IOER)支付利息时,银行面临着一个选择,要么获得“高于”无风险利率,要么放贷以获得更高、风险更高的利率。有证据表明,“准备金贷款难题”不是由反向因果关系、避险或增加国债供应的内生性驱动的,而是由“准备金溢价”(IOER-3MT)的引入驱动的,这与国内银行层面贷款减少5.1%(- 4202亿美元)有关。研究结果表明,储备风险渠道有助于限制通胀。此外,最近的高级财务官调查证实了本文提出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Better than risk-free: Reserve premiums and bank lending

Better than risk-free: Reserve premiums and bank lending

When the Federal Reserve first paid interest on excess reserves (IOER) in October 2008, banks faced a choice to earn a “better than” risk-free rate, or lend to earn a higher, riskier rate. Evidence suggests the “reserves-lending puzzle” is not driven by endogeneity from reverse causality, flight to safety, or increased Treasury supply, but by the introduction of the “reserve premium” (IOER-3MT), which is associated with a reduction of domestic bank-level lending by -5.1% (-$420.2B). Findings suggest the reserves risk channel can aid in restricting inflation. Additionally, recent Senior Financial Officer Surveys corroborate the conclusions presented in this paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FINANCIAL REVIEW
FINANCIAL REVIEW BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
28.10%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信