利用沉积古DNA数据检测生态相互作用的挑战

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Fiona Margaret Callahan, Jacky Kaiyuan Li, Rasmus Nielsen
{"title":"利用沉积古DNA数据检测生态相互作用的挑战","authors":"Fiona Margaret Callahan,&nbsp;Jacky Kaiyuan Li,&nbsp;Rasmus Nielsen","doi":"10.1002/edn3.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>With increasing availability of ancient and modern environmental DNA technology, whole-community species occurrence and abundance data over time and space is becoming more available. Sedimentary ancient DNA data can be used to infer associations between species, which can generate hypotheses about biotic interactions, a key part of ecosystem function and biodiversity science. Here, we have developed a realistic simulation to evaluate five common methods from different fields for this type of inference. We find that across all methods tested, false discovery rates of interspecies associations are high under simulation conditions where the assumptions of the methods are violated in a variety of ecologically realistic ways. Additionally, we find that for more realistic simulation scenarios, with sample sizes that are currently realistic for this type of data, models are typically unable to detect interactions better than random assignment of associations. Different methods perform differentially well depending on the number of taxa in the dataset. Some methods (SPIEC-EASI, SparCC) assume that there are large numbers of taxa in the dataset, and we find that SPIEC-EASI is highly sensitive to this assumption while SparCC is not. Additionally, we find that for many methods, default calibration can result in high false discovery rates. We find that for small numbers of species, no method consistently outperforms logistic and linear regression, indicating a need for further testing and methods development.</p>","PeriodicalId":52828,"journal":{"name":"Environmental DNA","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70067","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in Detecting Ecological Interactions Using Sedimentary Ancient DNA Data\",\"authors\":\"Fiona Margaret Callahan,&nbsp;Jacky Kaiyuan Li,&nbsp;Rasmus Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn3.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>With increasing availability of ancient and modern environmental DNA technology, whole-community species occurrence and abundance data over time and space is becoming more available. Sedimentary ancient DNA data can be used to infer associations between species, which can generate hypotheses about biotic interactions, a key part of ecosystem function and biodiversity science. Here, we have developed a realistic simulation to evaluate five common methods from different fields for this type of inference. We find that across all methods tested, false discovery rates of interspecies associations are high under simulation conditions where the assumptions of the methods are violated in a variety of ecologically realistic ways. Additionally, we find that for more realistic simulation scenarios, with sample sizes that are currently realistic for this type of data, models are typically unable to detect interactions better than random assignment of associations. Different methods perform differentially well depending on the number of taxa in the dataset. Some methods (SPIEC-EASI, SparCC) assume that there are large numbers of taxa in the dataset, and we find that SPIEC-EASI is highly sensitive to this assumption while SparCC is not. Additionally, we find that for many methods, default calibration can result in high false discovery rates. We find that for small numbers of species, no method consistently outperforms logistic and linear regression, indicating a need for further testing and methods development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/edn3.70067\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental DNA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental DNA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn3.70067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着古代和现代环境DNA技术的日益可用性,整个群落物种的发生和丰度随时间和空间的变化变得越来越容易获得。沉积的古代DNA数据可以用来推断物种之间的关联,这可以产生关于生物相互作用的假设,这是生态系统功能和生物多样性科学的关键部分。在这里,我们开发了一个现实的模拟来评估来自不同领域的五种常见方法用于这种类型的推理。我们发现,在所有测试的方法中,在模拟条件下,物种间关联的错误发现率很高,其中方法的假设以各种生态现实的方式被违反。此外,我们发现,对于更现实的模拟场景,对于这种类型的数据来说,样本量目前是现实的,模型通常无法比随机分配关联更好地检测相互作用。根据数据集中分类群的数量不同,不同的方法表现也不同。一些方法(SPIEC-EASI, SparCC)假设数据集中有大量的分类群,我们发现SPIEC-EASI对这一假设高度敏感,而SparCC则不然。此外,我们发现对于许多方法,默认校准可能导致高错误发现率。我们发现,对于少数物种,没有任何方法始终优于逻辑和线性回归,这表明需要进一步的测试和方法开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Challenges in Detecting Ecological Interactions Using Sedimentary Ancient DNA Data

Challenges in Detecting Ecological Interactions Using Sedimentary Ancient DNA Data

With increasing availability of ancient and modern environmental DNA technology, whole-community species occurrence and abundance data over time and space is becoming more available. Sedimentary ancient DNA data can be used to infer associations between species, which can generate hypotheses about biotic interactions, a key part of ecosystem function and biodiversity science. Here, we have developed a realistic simulation to evaluate five common methods from different fields for this type of inference. We find that across all methods tested, false discovery rates of interspecies associations are high under simulation conditions where the assumptions of the methods are violated in a variety of ecologically realistic ways. Additionally, we find that for more realistic simulation scenarios, with sample sizes that are currently realistic for this type of data, models are typically unable to detect interactions better than random assignment of associations. Different methods perform differentially well depending on the number of taxa in the dataset. Some methods (SPIEC-EASI, SparCC) assume that there are large numbers of taxa in the dataset, and we find that SPIEC-EASI is highly sensitive to this assumption while SparCC is not. Additionally, we find that for many methods, default calibration can result in high false discovery rates. We find that for small numbers of species, no method consistently outperforms logistic and linear regression, indicating a need for further testing and methods development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信