桥接动作执行与动作意象脑机接口范例:一种任务间迁移学习方法

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sergio Pérez-Velasco, Diego Marcos-Martínez, Eduardo Santamaría-Vázquez, Víctor Martínez-Cagigal, Roberto Hornero
{"title":"桥接动作执行与动作意象脑机接口范例:一种任务间迁移学习方法","authors":"Sergio Pérez-Velasco,&nbsp;Diego Marcos-Martínez,&nbsp;Eduardo Santamaría-Vázquez,&nbsp;Víctor Martínez-Cagigal,&nbsp;Roberto Hornero","doi":"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Motor imagery (MI)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) decode movement imagination from brain activity, but improving decoding accuracy from electroencephalography (EEG) remains challenging. MI-based BCIs require calibration runs to train models; however, participant engagement cannot be externally verified. Motor execution (ME) is more straightforward and can be supervised. Deep learning (DL) leverages transfer learning (TL) to bypass calibration. This is the first work to explore wether a ME-trained DL model can reliably classify MI without finetuning to the MI task, thereby achieving direct TL between ME and MI tasks. We employed EEGSym, a DL network for inter-subject TL of EEG decoding, evaluating three scenarios: ME to MI, ME to ME, and MI to MI classification. We analyzed performance correlation between scenarios, and used shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to elucidate model focus patterns learned from ME or MI data. Results show that DL models trained on ME data and tested on MI perform comparably to those trained on MI data. A significant positive correlation was found between performance in ME and MI tasks for models trained on ME data. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques revealed robust correlation between patterns in ME and MI tasks. However, between 0.5 to 1 s, the ME-trained model focused on the contralateral central region, while the MI-trained model also targeted the ipsilateral fronto-central region. Our findings demonstrate the viability of inter-task TL between ME and MI using DL models in BCI applications. This supports using ME-trained models for MI tasks to enhance targeted learning of brain activation patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55362,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 107834"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging motor execution and motor imagery BCI paradigms: An inter-task transfer learning approach\",\"authors\":\"Sergio Pérez-Velasco,&nbsp;Diego Marcos-Martínez,&nbsp;Eduardo Santamaría-Vázquez,&nbsp;Víctor Martínez-Cagigal,&nbsp;Roberto Hornero\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bspc.2025.107834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Motor imagery (MI)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) decode movement imagination from brain activity, but improving decoding accuracy from electroencephalography (EEG) remains challenging. MI-based BCIs require calibration runs to train models; however, participant engagement cannot be externally verified. Motor execution (ME) is more straightforward and can be supervised. Deep learning (DL) leverages transfer learning (TL) to bypass calibration. This is the first work to explore wether a ME-trained DL model can reliably classify MI without finetuning to the MI task, thereby achieving direct TL between ME and MI tasks. We employed EEGSym, a DL network for inter-subject TL of EEG decoding, evaluating three scenarios: ME to MI, ME to ME, and MI to MI classification. We analyzed performance correlation between scenarios, and used shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to elucidate model focus patterns learned from ME or MI data. Results show that DL models trained on ME data and tested on MI perform comparably to those trained on MI data. A significant positive correlation was found between performance in ME and MI tasks for models trained on ME data. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques revealed robust correlation between patterns in ME and MI tasks. However, between 0.5 to 1 s, the ME-trained model focused on the contralateral central region, while the MI-trained model also targeted the ipsilateral fronto-central region. Our findings demonstrate the viability of inter-task TL between ME and MI using DL models in BCI applications. This supports using ME-trained models for MI tasks to enhance targeted learning of brain activation patterns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"volume\":\"107 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425003453\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Signal Processing and Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746809425003453","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于运动图像(MI)的脑机接口(bci)从大脑活动中解码运动想象,但提高从脑电图(EEG)解码的准确性仍然具有挑战性。基于mi的脑机接口需要校准运行来训练模型;然而,参与者的参与度无法从外部验证。运动执行(ME)更直接,可以监督。深度学习(DL)利用迁移学习(TL)绕过校准。这是第一个探索ME训练的深度学习模型是否可以在不微调MI任务的情况下可靠地对MI进行分类,从而实现ME和MI任务之间的直接TL的工作。我们采用EEG - sym深度学习网络进行脑电解码的主体间TL,评估了三种场景:ME到MI、ME到ME和MI到MI分类。我们分析了场景之间的性能相关性,并使用shapley加性解释(SHAP)来阐明从ME或MI数据中学习到的模型焦点模式。结果表明,在ME数据上训练和在MI数据上测试的深度学习模型的性能与在MI数据上训练的模型相当。在ME数据上训练的模型在ME和MI任务中的表现之间发现了显著的正相关。可解释的人工智能(XAI)技术揭示了ME和MI任务模式之间的强大相关性。然而,在0.5 ~ 1s之间,me训练的模型集中在对侧中央区域,而mi训练的模型也针对同侧额中央区域。我们的研究结果证明了在脑机接口应用中使用DL模型在ME和MI之间进行任务间TL的可行性。这支持使用me训练的模型进行MI任务,以增强对大脑激活模式的有针对性的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging motor execution and motor imagery BCI paradigms: An inter-task transfer learning approach
Motor imagery (MI)-based brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) decode movement imagination from brain activity, but improving decoding accuracy from electroencephalography (EEG) remains challenging. MI-based BCIs require calibration runs to train models; however, participant engagement cannot be externally verified. Motor execution (ME) is more straightforward and can be supervised. Deep learning (DL) leverages transfer learning (TL) to bypass calibration. This is the first work to explore wether a ME-trained DL model can reliably classify MI without finetuning to the MI task, thereby achieving direct TL between ME and MI tasks. We employed EEGSym, a DL network for inter-subject TL of EEG decoding, evaluating three scenarios: ME to MI, ME to ME, and MI to MI classification. We analyzed performance correlation between scenarios, and used shapley additive explanations (SHAP) to elucidate model focus patterns learned from ME or MI data. Results show that DL models trained on ME data and tested on MI perform comparably to those trained on MI data. A significant positive correlation was found between performance in ME and MI tasks for models trained on ME data. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques revealed robust correlation between patterns in ME and MI tasks. However, between 0.5 to 1 s, the ME-trained model focused on the contralateral central region, while the MI-trained model also targeted the ipsilateral fronto-central region. Our findings demonstrate the viability of inter-task TL between ME and MI using DL models in BCI applications. This supports using ME-trained models for MI tasks to enhance targeted learning of brain activation patterns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
13.70%
发文量
822
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biomedical Signal Processing and Control aims to provide a cross-disciplinary international forum for the interchange of information on research in the measurement and analysis of signals and images in clinical medicine and the biological sciences. Emphasis is placed on contributions dealing with the practical, applications-led research on the use of methods and devices in clinical diagnosis, patient monitoring and management. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control reflects the main areas in which these methods are being used and developed at the interface of both engineering and clinical science. The scope of the journal is defined to include relevant review papers, technical notes, short communications and letters. Tutorial papers and special issues will also be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信