Emily Sammons , Louise Bowman , Marion Mafham , Jane Armitage
{"title":"与ASCEND-eye随机试验中NHS糖尿病眼筛查项目记录的联系经验及改进建议","authors":"Emily Sammons , Louise Bowman , Marion Mafham , Jane Armitage","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of linking to the NHS diabetic eye screening programme records in the ASCEND-eye randomized trial and recommendations for improvement\",\"authors\":\"Emily Sammons , Louise Bowman , Marion Mafham , Jane Armitage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experience of linking to the NHS diabetic eye screening programme records in the ASCEND-eye randomized trial and recommendations for improvement
Background
The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.
Objective
To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.
Results
The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.
Conclusion
Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.