与ASCEND-eye随机试验中NHS糖尿病眼筛查项目记录的联系经验及改进建议

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Emily Sammons , Louise Bowman , Marion Mafham , Jane Armitage
{"title":"与ASCEND-eye随机试验中NHS糖尿病眼筛查项目记录的联系经验及改进建议","authors":"Emily Sammons ,&nbsp;Louise Bowman ,&nbsp;Marion Mafham ,&nbsp;Jane Armitage","doi":"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37937,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 101474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experience of linking to the NHS diabetic eye screening programme records in the ASCEND-eye randomized trial and recommendations for improvement\",\"authors\":\"Emily Sammons ,&nbsp;Louise Bowman ,&nbsp;Marion Mafham ,&nbsp;Jane Armitage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451865425000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型双盲、2x2因子设计、安慰剂对照ASCEND试验的ASCEND-Eye亚研究比较了阿司匹林和omega-3脂肪酸分别对来自英格兰和威尔士NHS糖尿病眼筛查项目(DESP)的糖尿病视网膜病变结局的影响,这些患者年龄在40岁或以上,患有糖尿病且没有预先存在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病。ASCEND-Eye的目标是前所未有的;在此之前,没有研究成功地在英格兰和威尔士的全国范围内获得了相关的DESP数据。目的介绍我院DESP档案的联机经验,以帮助其他希望使用DESP档案的研究人员。我们解释了应用程序流程、交付时间和所需资源,以及如何管理这些数据。从监管机构和伦理委员会批准ASCEND-Eye到数据采集,整个过程花了四年时间。遇到了几个挑战,包括缺乏定义NHS筛选服务治理的文件,缺乏单一的中央数据存储库,与多个数据控制器联络的固有复杂性,以及英格兰近一半的desp缺乏对合作邀请的响应。结论常规收集的卫生保健数据是临床试验中结局测量信息的重要来源。然而,研究人员经常面临访问这些数据集的障碍,尽管他们已经获得了试验参与者的书面知情同意。我们希望鼓励更多的NHS desp参与研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experience of linking to the NHS diabetic eye screening programme records in the ASCEND-eye randomized trial and recommendations for improvement

Background

The ASCEND-Eye sub-study of the large, double-blind, 2x2 factorial design, placebo-controlled ASCEND trial compared the effects of aspirin and, separately, omega-3 fatty acids on diabetic retinopathy outcomes derived from NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Programmes (DESP) in England and Wales, in adults aged 40 years or older with diabetes and no pre-existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. ASCEND-Eye was unprecedented in what it set out to achieve; no previous studies had successfully obtained linked DESP data for research purposes on a national scale in England and Wales before.

Objective

To describe our experience of linking DESP records to help other researchers wishing to use them. We explain the application process, lead times and resources required, and how these data were governed.

Results

The process of gaining regulatory and ethics committee approval for ASCEND-Eye through to data acquisition took four years. Several challenges were encountered, including a lack of documentation defining the governance of the NHS screening service, the absence of a single central data repository, the inherent complexity of liaising with multiple data controllers, and a lack of responsiveness to invitations to collaborate by nearly half of the DESPs in England.

Conclusion

Routinely collected healthcare data is a valuable source of outcome measure information in clinical trials. However, researchers frequently face barriers to accessing these datasets despite having written informed consent from trial participants to do so. We hope to encourage more NHS DESPs to take part in research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
146
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is an international peer reviewed open access journal that publishes articles pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from a wide range of disciplines including medicine, life science, pharmaceutical science, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioral science, and bioethics. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is unique in that it is outside the confines of disease specifications, and it strives to increase the transparency of medical research and reduce publication bias by publishing scientifically valid original research findings irrespective of their perceived importance, significance or impact. Both randomized and non-randomized trials are within the scope of the Journal. Some common topics include trial design rationale and methods, operational methodologies and challenges, and positive and negative trial results. In addition to original research, the Journal also welcomes other types of communications including, but are not limited to, methodology reviews, perspectives and discussions. Through timely dissemination of advances in clinical trials, the goal of Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications is to serve as a platform to enhance the communication and collaboration within the global clinical trials community that ultimately advances this field of research for the benefit of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信