Sylvester Kyei-Gyamfi, Frank Kyei-Arthur, Fred Amankwah-Sarfo, Johnson Kagya Owusu, Margaret Appiah, Deborah Atobrah
{"title":"加纳家庭环境中儿童的体罚和其他纠正措施:儿童和父母的观点","authors":"Sylvester Kyei-Gyamfi, Frank Kyei-Arthur, Fred Amankwah-Sarfo, Johnson Kagya Owusu, Margaret Appiah, Deborah Atobrah","doi":"10.1007/s10560-025-01011-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Correcting children is a crucial component of their growth. In Ghana, there is limited research on corrective measures for children in domestic settings and from the perspectives of children and parents using nationally representative data. This study examined the prevalence and type of corrective measures for children, sex differentials in corrective measures, the perpetrators of corrective measures, the reasons for carrying out corrective measures, and children’s and parents’ opinions on corrective measures and their appropriateness. Secondary mixed-method data from the Ministry of Gender, Children, and Social Protection was used for this study. The quantitative data involved 5,024 children aged 8 to 17, while the qualitative data involved 10 focus group discussions and 50 key informant interviews. Respondents were from 48 districts selected from all regions of Ghana. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square were used to analyze the quantitative data, while the qualitative data were thematically analyzed. About 88% of children experienced corrective measures for their misbehavior at home in the last six months. Corporal punishment was the most common corrective measure used for children, and more mothers disciplined children than fathers. However, mothers disciplined children for minor misbehaviors, while fathers disciplined children for major misbehaviors. Generally, children and parents agreed on the need to discipline children for their misbehavior. However, children are of the view that the corrective measure should be non-violent. Corporal punishment was the most common discipline measure used for children. Parents should be educated to use non-violent corrective measures that do not endanger children when disciplining them.</p>","PeriodicalId":51512,"journal":{"name":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporal Punishment and Other Corrective Measures for Children in Domestic Settings in Ghana: Perspectives of Children and Parents\",\"authors\":\"Sylvester Kyei-Gyamfi, Frank Kyei-Arthur, Fred Amankwah-Sarfo, Johnson Kagya Owusu, Margaret Appiah, Deborah Atobrah\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10560-025-01011-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Correcting children is a crucial component of their growth. In Ghana, there is limited research on corrective measures for children in domestic settings and from the perspectives of children and parents using nationally representative data. This study examined the prevalence and type of corrective measures for children, sex differentials in corrective measures, the perpetrators of corrective measures, the reasons for carrying out corrective measures, and children’s and parents’ opinions on corrective measures and their appropriateness. Secondary mixed-method data from the Ministry of Gender, Children, and Social Protection was used for this study. The quantitative data involved 5,024 children aged 8 to 17, while the qualitative data involved 10 focus group discussions and 50 key informant interviews. Respondents were from 48 districts selected from all regions of Ghana. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square were used to analyze the quantitative data, while the qualitative data were thematically analyzed. About 88% of children experienced corrective measures for their misbehavior at home in the last six months. Corporal punishment was the most common corrective measure used for children, and more mothers disciplined children than fathers. However, mothers disciplined children for minor misbehaviors, while fathers disciplined children for major misbehaviors. Generally, children and parents agreed on the need to discipline children for their misbehavior. However, children are of the view that the corrective measure should be non-violent. Corporal punishment was the most common discipline measure used for children. Parents should be educated to use non-violent corrective measures that do not endanger children when disciplining them.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-025-01011-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10560-025-01011-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
Corporal Punishment and Other Corrective Measures for Children in Domestic Settings in Ghana: Perspectives of Children and Parents
Correcting children is a crucial component of their growth. In Ghana, there is limited research on corrective measures for children in domestic settings and from the perspectives of children and parents using nationally representative data. This study examined the prevalence and type of corrective measures for children, sex differentials in corrective measures, the perpetrators of corrective measures, the reasons for carrying out corrective measures, and children’s and parents’ opinions on corrective measures and their appropriateness. Secondary mixed-method data from the Ministry of Gender, Children, and Social Protection was used for this study. The quantitative data involved 5,024 children aged 8 to 17, while the qualitative data involved 10 focus group discussions and 50 key informant interviews. Respondents were from 48 districts selected from all regions of Ghana. Descriptive statistics and Pearson’s chi-square were used to analyze the quantitative data, while the qualitative data were thematically analyzed. About 88% of children experienced corrective measures for their misbehavior at home in the last six months. Corporal punishment was the most common corrective measure used for children, and more mothers disciplined children than fathers. However, mothers disciplined children for minor misbehaviors, while fathers disciplined children for major misbehaviors. Generally, children and parents agreed on the need to discipline children for their misbehavior. However, children are of the view that the corrective measure should be non-violent. Corporal punishment was the most common discipline measure used for children. Parents should be educated to use non-violent corrective measures that do not endanger children when disciplining them.
期刊介绍:
The Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal (CASW) features original articles that focus on social work practice with children, adolescents, and their families. Topics include issues affecting a variety of specific populations in special settings. CASW welcomes a range of scholarly contributions focused on children and adolescents, including theoretical papers, narrative case studies, historical analyses, traditional reviews of the literature, descriptive studies, single-system research designs, correlational investigations, methodological works, pre-experimental, quasi-experimental and experimental evaluations, meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Manuscripts involving qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods are welcome to be submitted, as are papers grounded in one or more theoretical orientations, or those that are not based on any formal theory. CASW values different disciplines and interdisciplinary work that informs social work practice and policy. Authors from public health, nursing, psychology, sociology, and other disciplines are encouraged to submit manuscripts. All manuscripts should include specific implications for social work policy and practice with children and adolescents. Appropriate fields of practice include interpersonal practice, small groups, families, organizations, communities, policy practice, nationally-oriented work, and international studies. Authors considering publication in CASW should review the following editorial: Schelbe, L., & Thyer, B. A. (2019). Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Editorial Policy: Guidelines for Authors. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 36, 75-80.