亚太地区外科植入物消毒:当前做法调查。

Wing Hong Seto, Patricia Tai Yin Ching
{"title":"亚太地区外科植入物消毒:当前做法调查。","authors":"Wing Hong Seto, Patricia Tai Yin Ching","doi":"10.1016/j.idh.2025.02.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-acquired infections are frequently linked to contaminated medical devices such as inadequately sterilized surgical devices, especially surgical implants. To prevent inadequate medical equipment sterilization, various health organizations (eg, World Health Organization) have provided guidance on best practices related to the sterilization monitoring practices of implant-containing loads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of sterilization practices, including practices related to monitoring implant-containing loads, at facilities from seven countries in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) and three countries in the Southeast Asia Region (SEAR) was conducted to assess alignment with health organization guidelines and to elucidate factors impacting sterilization practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workload distribution was selected by 47 % of respondents when asked what had changed over the past year. Overall, 21 % of respondents were not monitoring each implant-containing load with a PCD (Process Challenge Device) containing a BI (Biological Indicator) with a Type-5 Chemical Indicator (CI), and 27 % of respondents had seen an implant load released prior to receiving BI results. Twenty-nine percent (29 %) of respondents had no placement guide for CIs when used in multi-level trays. Lastly, 43 % of respondents routinely performed immediate use system sterilization (IUSS), which commonly involved loaner instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this survey study indicate that inappropriate PCD usage in implant loads and frequent IUSS are challenges for some facilities in SEAR and WPR countries. Regional collaboration to produce consensus documents and educational programs may help develop strategies to standardize practice of implant load monitoring and loaner instruments. Thus, a consortium to initiate education programs for SEAR and WPR countries would be worthwhile.</p>","PeriodicalId":94040,"journal":{"name":"Infection, disease & health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical implant sterilization in the Asia-Pacific region: A survey of current practices.\",\"authors\":\"Wing Hong Seto, Patricia Tai Yin Ching\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idh.2025.02.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-acquired infections are frequently linked to contaminated medical devices such as inadequately sterilized surgical devices, especially surgical implants. To prevent inadequate medical equipment sterilization, various health organizations (eg, World Health Organization) have provided guidance on best practices related to the sterilization monitoring practices of implant-containing loads.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of sterilization practices, including practices related to monitoring implant-containing loads, at facilities from seven countries in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) and three countries in the Southeast Asia Region (SEAR) was conducted to assess alignment with health organization guidelines and to elucidate factors impacting sterilization practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Workload distribution was selected by 47 % of respondents when asked what had changed over the past year. Overall, 21 % of respondents were not monitoring each implant-containing load with a PCD (Process Challenge Device) containing a BI (Biological Indicator) with a Type-5 Chemical Indicator (CI), and 27 % of respondents had seen an implant load released prior to receiving BI results. Twenty-nine percent (29 %) of respondents had no placement guide for CIs when used in multi-level trays. Lastly, 43 % of respondents routinely performed immediate use system sterilization (IUSS), which commonly involved loaner instruments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this survey study indicate that inappropriate PCD usage in implant loads and frequent IUSS are challenges for some facilities in SEAR and WPR countries. Regional collaboration to produce consensus documents and educational programs may help develop strategies to standardize practice of implant load monitoring and loaner instruments. Thus, a consortium to initiate education programs for SEAR and WPR countries would be worthwhile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection, disease & health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection, disease & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.02.006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection, disease & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.02.006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical implant sterilization in the Asia-Pacific region: A survey of current practices.

Background: Healthcare-acquired infections are frequently linked to contaminated medical devices such as inadequately sterilized surgical devices, especially surgical implants. To prevent inadequate medical equipment sterilization, various health organizations (eg, World Health Organization) have provided guidance on best practices related to the sterilization monitoring practices of implant-containing loads.

Methods: A survey of sterilization practices, including practices related to monitoring implant-containing loads, at facilities from seven countries in the Western Pacific Region (WPR) and three countries in the Southeast Asia Region (SEAR) was conducted to assess alignment with health organization guidelines and to elucidate factors impacting sterilization practices.

Results: Workload distribution was selected by 47 % of respondents when asked what had changed over the past year. Overall, 21 % of respondents were not monitoring each implant-containing load with a PCD (Process Challenge Device) containing a BI (Biological Indicator) with a Type-5 Chemical Indicator (CI), and 27 % of respondents had seen an implant load released prior to receiving BI results. Twenty-nine percent (29 %) of respondents had no placement guide for CIs when used in multi-level trays. Lastly, 43 % of respondents routinely performed immediate use system sterilization (IUSS), which commonly involved loaner instruments.

Conclusions: The results of this survey study indicate that inappropriate PCD usage in implant loads and frequent IUSS are challenges for some facilities in SEAR and WPR countries. Regional collaboration to produce consensus documents and educational programs may help develop strategies to standardize practice of implant load monitoring and loaner instruments. Thus, a consortium to initiate education programs for SEAR and WPR countries would be worthwhile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信