土耳其成人癌症患者适应性疾病应对量表的心理测量特征

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Cansu Akdag Topal, Reyyan Gurel, Tugce Ucgun, Betul Sahin Kılınc
{"title":"土耳其成人癌症患者适应性疾病应对量表的心理测量特征","authors":"Cansu Akdag Topal, Reyyan Gurel, Tugce Ucgun, Betul Sahin Kılınc","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Adaptive Coping with Disease Scale (ACDS) questionnaire for Turkish patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 175 patients with cancer aged 18 to 65 years were referred to a university hospital in Ankara, Türkiye. The patients, selected by convenience sampling in 2024, completed the Descriptive Form and Turkish versions of the ACDS questionnaire. The construct validity of the scale was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationships between item-total scores and item-subscale total scores. The reliability of the scale was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. In addition, the scale language validity and test-retest reliability were evaluated. The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS 25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale demonstrated high validity (content validity index = 0.97, interclass coefficient = 0.721, P < .001), indicating high stability and consistency of test scores over time. The comparative fit index confirmed the six-factor structure of the ACDS scale, excluding item 13. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.738, and Bartlett's test yielded a value of 2305.623 (P < .001). Fit indices indicated a good model fit (χ²/degrees of freedom = 1.98, root mean square error of approximation = 0.074, comparative fit index = 0.815). The scale exhibited acceptable internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.78. The total explained variance ratio was 57.14%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish version of ACDS in patients with cancer is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used in clinics and research.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>Nurses can use the ACDS to assess the level of disease-related stress experienced by patients with cancer. In addition, they can guide the patients to develop effective coping methods and a better quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"151847"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Adaptive Coping with Disease Scale in Adult Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Cansu Akdag Topal, Reyyan Gurel, Tugce Ucgun, Betul Sahin Kılınc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Adaptive Coping with Disease Scale (ACDS) questionnaire for Turkish patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 175 patients with cancer aged 18 to 65 years were referred to a university hospital in Ankara, Türkiye. The patients, selected by convenience sampling in 2024, completed the Descriptive Form and Turkish versions of the ACDS questionnaire. The construct validity of the scale was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationships between item-total scores and item-subscale total scores. The reliability of the scale was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. In addition, the scale language validity and test-retest reliability were evaluated. The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS 25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The scale demonstrated high validity (content validity index = 0.97, interclass coefficient = 0.721, P < .001), indicating high stability and consistency of test scores over time. The comparative fit index confirmed the six-factor structure of the ACDS scale, excluding item 13. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.738, and Bartlett's test yielded a value of 2305.623 (P < .001). Fit indices indicated a good model fit (χ²/degrees of freedom = 1.98, root mean square error of approximation = 0.074, comparative fit index = 0.815). The scale exhibited acceptable internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.78. The total explained variance ratio was 57.14%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Turkish version of ACDS in patients with cancer is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used in clinics and research.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>Nurses can use the ACDS to assess the level of disease-related stress experienced by patients with cancer. In addition, they can guide the patients to develop effective coping methods and a better quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"151847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151847\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151847","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们评估土耳其版适应性疾病应对量表(ACDS)问卷对土耳其癌症患者的心理测量特性。方法:共175例18至65岁的癌症患者被转介到土耳其安卡拉的一所大学医院。2024年通过方便抽样选择的患者填写了描述性表格和土耳其语版ACDS问卷。通过验证性因子分析和探索性因子分析对量表的构念效度进行评估。采用Pearson相关分析评价项目总分与项目子量表总分之间的关系。量表的信度采用Cronbach’s alpha系数测定。并对量表的语言效度和重测信度进行了评估。采用IBM SPSS Statistics和AMOS 25对数据进行分析。结果:量表具有较高的效度(内容效度指数 = 0.97,类间系数 = 0.721,P < .001),表明测验成绩随时间的变化具有较高的稳定性和一致性。比较拟合指数证实了ACDS量表的六因子结构,不包括项目13。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin系数为0.738,Bartlett检验结果为2305.623 (P < 0.001)。拟合指标表明模型拟合良好(χ²/自由度 = 1.98,近似均方根误差 = 0.074,比较拟合指标 = 0.815)。量表显示出可接受的内部一致性,总体Cronbach's alpha为0.78。总解释方差比为57.14%。结论:土耳其语版癌症患者ACDS问卷是一份可靠有效的问卷,可用于临床和研究。对护理实践的启示:护士可以使用ACDS来评估癌症患者所经历的疾病相关压力水平。此外,他们还可以指导患者制定有效的应对方法,提高生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Adaptive Coping with Disease Scale in Adult Cancer Patients.

Objectives: We evaluated the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Adaptive Coping with Disease Scale (ACDS) questionnaire for Turkish patients with cancer.

Methods: A total of 175 patients with cancer aged 18 to 65 years were referred to a university hospital in Ankara, Türkiye. The patients, selected by convenience sampling in 2024, completed the Descriptive Form and Turkish versions of the ACDS questionnaire. The construct validity of the scale was assessed through confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis. Pearson's correlation analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationships between item-total scores and item-subscale total scores. The reliability of the scale was determined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. In addition, the scale language validity and test-retest reliability were evaluated. The data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS 25.

Results: The scale demonstrated high validity (content validity index = 0.97, interclass coefficient = 0.721, P < .001), indicating high stability and consistency of test scores over time. The comparative fit index confirmed the six-factor structure of the ACDS scale, excluding item 13. The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin coefficient was 0.738, and Bartlett's test yielded a value of 2305.623 (P < .001). Fit indices indicated a good model fit (χ²/degrees of freedom = 1.98, root mean square error of approximation = 0.074, comparative fit index = 0.815). The scale exhibited acceptable internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.78. The total explained variance ratio was 57.14%.

Conclusions: The Turkish version of ACDS in patients with cancer is a reliable and valid questionnaire that can be used in clinics and research.

Implications for nursing practice: Nurses can use the ACDS to assess the level of disease-related stress experienced by patients with cancer. In addition, they can guide the patients to develop effective coping methods and a better quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信