腕管综合征分级的多模式深度学习:中国的一项多中心研究。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xiaochen Shi, Tianxiang Yu, Yu Yuan, Dan Wang, Jinhua Cui, Ling Bai, Fang Zheng, Xiaobin Dai, Zhuhuang Zhou
{"title":"腕管综合征分级的多模式深度学习:中国的一项多中心研究。","authors":"Xiaochen Shi, Tianxiang Yu, Yu Yuan, Dan Wang, Jinhua Cui, Ling Bai, Fang Zheng, Xiaobin Dai, Zhuhuang Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Ultrasound (US)-based deep learning (DL) models for grading the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are scarce. We aimed to advance CTS grading by developing a joint-DL model integrating clinical information and multimodal US features.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective dataset of CTS patients from three hospitals was randomly divided into the training (n=680) and internal validation (n=173) sets. An external validation set was prospectively recruited from another hospital (n=174). To further test the model's generalizability, cross-vendor testing was conducted at three additional hospitals utilizing different US systems in the external validation set 2 (n=224). An US-based model was developed to grade CTS severity utilizing multimodal sonographic features, including cross-sectional area [CSA], echogenicity, longitudinal nerve appearance, and intraneural vascularity. A joint-DL model (CTSGrader) was constructed integrating sonographic features and clinical information. Diagnostic performance of both models was verified based on electrophysiological results. In the validation sets, the better-performing model was compared to two junior and two senior radiologists. Additionally, the radiologists' diagnostic performance with artificial intelligence (AI) assistance was evaluated in external validation sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTSGrader achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.951, 0.910, and 0.897 in the validation sets. The accuracies of CTSGrader were 0.849, 0.833, and 0.827, which were higher than those of US-based model (all p<.05). It outperformed two junior and one senior radiologists (all p<.05) and was equivalent to 1 senior radiologist (all p>.05). With its assistance, the accuracies of two junior and one senior radiologists were improved (all p<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The joint-DL model (CTSGrader) developed in our study outperformed the single-modality model. The AI-aided strategy suggested its potential to support clinical decision-making for grading CTS severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multimodal Deep Learning for Grading Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Multicenter Study in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaochen Shi, Tianxiang Yu, Yu Yuan, Dan Wang, Jinhua Cui, Ling Bai, Fang Zheng, Xiaobin Dai, Zhuhuang Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Ultrasound (US)-based deep learning (DL) models for grading the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are scarce. We aimed to advance CTS grading by developing a joint-DL model integrating clinical information and multimodal US features.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective dataset of CTS patients from three hospitals was randomly divided into the training (n=680) and internal validation (n=173) sets. An external validation set was prospectively recruited from another hospital (n=174). To further test the model's generalizability, cross-vendor testing was conducted at three additional hospitals utilizing different US systems in the external validation set 2 (n=224). An US-based model was developed to grade CTS severity utilizing multimodal sonographic features, including cross-sectional area [CSA], echogenicity, longitudinal nerve appearance, and intraneural vascularity. A joint-DL model (CTSGrader) was constructed integrating sonographic features and clinical information. Diagnostic performance of both models was verified based on electrophysiological results. In the validation sets, the better-performing model was compared to two junior and two senior radiologists. Additionally, the radiologists' diagnostic performance with artificial intelligence (AI) assistance was evaluated in external validation sets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CTSGrader achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.951, 0.910, and 0.897 in the validation sets. The accuracies of CTSGrader were 0.849, 0.833, and 0.827, which were higher than those of US-based model (all p<.05). It outperformed two junior and one senior radiologists (all p<.05) and was equivalent to 1 senior radiologist (all p>.05). With its assistance, the accuracies of two junior and one senior radiologists were improved (all p<.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The joint-DL model (CTSGrader) developed in our study outperformed the single-modality model. The AI-aided strategy suggested its potential to support clinical decision-making for grading CTS severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.02.043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基本原理和目的:用于分级腕管综合征(CTS)严重程度的基于超声(US)的深度学习(DL)模型很少。我们的目标是通过开发一个联合dl模型来整合临床信息和多模式US特征来推进CTS分级。材料和方法:回顾性分析来自三家医院的CTS患者数据集,随机分为训练组(n=680)和内部验证组(n=173)。前瞻性地从另一家医院招募外部验证组(n=174)。为了进一步检验模型的通用性,我们在外部验证集2 (n=224)中使用不同的美国系统的另外三家医院进行了跨供应商测试。我们开发了一个基于美国的模型,利用多模态超声特征,包括横断面积(CSA)、回声性、纵神经外观和神经内血管分布,对CTS的严重程度进行分级。结合超声特征和临床信息构建联合dl模型(CTSGrader)。基于电生理结果验证了两种模型的诊断性能。在验证集中,将表现较好的模型与两名初级和两名高级放射科医生进行比较。此外,放射科医生在人工智能(AI)辅助下的诊断表现在外部验证集中进行了评估。结果:CTSGrader在验证集中的曲线下面积(auc)分别为0.951、0.910和0.897。CTSGrader的准确率分别为0.849、0.833和0.827,均高于美国模型(p < 0.05)。在它的帮助下,两名初级放射科医生和一名高级放射科医生的准确率得到了提高(均为)。结论:我们研究开发的联合dl模型(CTSGrader)优于单模态模型。人工智能辅助策略表明,它有潜力支持CTS严重程度分级的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multimodal Deep Learning for Grading Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Multicenter Study in China.

Rationale and objectives: Ultrasound (US)-based deep learning (DL) models for grading the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are scarce. We aimed to advance CTS grading by developing a joint-DL model integrating clinical information and multimodal US features.

Materials and methods: A retrospective dataset of CTS patients from three hospitals was randomly divided into the training (n=680) and internal validation (n=173) sets. An external validation set was prospectively recruited from another hospital (n=174). To further test the model's generalizability, cross-vendor testing was conducted at three additional hospitals utilizing different US systems in the external validation set 2 (n=224). An US-based model was developed to grade CTS severity utilizing multimodal sonographic features, including cross-sectional area [CSA], echogenicity, longitudinal nerve appearance, and intraneural vascularity. A joint-DL model (CTSGrader) was constructed integrating sonographic features and clinical information. Diagnostic performance of both models was verified based on electrophysiological results. In the validation sets, the better-performing model was compared to two junior and two senior radiologists. Additionally, the radiologists' diagnostic performance with artificial intelligence (AI) assistance was evaluated in external validation sets.

Results: CTSGrader achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.951, 0.910, and 0.897 in the validation sets. The accuracies of CTSGrader were 0.849, 0.833, and 0.827, which were higher than those of US-based model (all p<.05). It outperformed two junior and one senior radiologists (all p<.05) and was equivalent to 1 senior radiologist (all p>.05). With its assistance, the accuracies of two junior and one senior radiologists were improved (all p<.05).

Conclusion: The joint-DL model (CTSGrader) developed in our study outperformed the single-modality model. The AI-aided strategy suggested its potential to support clinical decision-making for grading CTS severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信