Elisângela Cristina Ramos Hernandes, Geovanna Maria de Moura, Adriana Lunardi, Luciana Chiavegato, Monica Rodrigues Perracini
{"title":"物理治疗师评估住院老年病人的做法：目前的差距是什么？","authors":"Elisângela Cristina Ramos Hernandes, Geovanna Maria de Moura, Adriana Lunardi, Luciana Chiavegato, Monica Rodrigues Perracini","doi":"10.1002/pri.70051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Incorporating Person-centred Care (PCC) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) practices for hospitalised patients result in positive health outcomes. We aimed to identify the frequency of incorporating PCC and CGA practices among physiotherapists (PTs) working in hospitals and its association with PTs' gender, years of experience, and duration of physiotherapy sessions and to identify the barriers to assessing older patients in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey with physiotherapists working in hospitals using a questionnaire including PTs characteristics, barriers and the frequency of incorporation of PCC and CGA practices, using a Likert scale. An ordinal regression analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Male PTs, compared to females, were less likely to consider the patient's and family's feelings (OR = 0.35; p = < 0.001), use appropriate language (OR = 0.42; p = 0.04), embrace the patient's feelings (OR = 0.28; p = < 0.001), adapts their communication (OR = 0.33; p = 0.006) and used encouragement and negotiation strategies (OR = 0.52; p = 0.02). Less experienced PTs (< 2 years) tended not to value older patients' choices (OR = 0.08; p = 0.03), share assessments with families (OR = 0.39; p < 0.001), define a care plan (OR = 0.61; p = 0.02), and embrace the patient's feelings, compared to more experienced ones. PTs conducting quick assessments (< 10 min) were less likely to provide feedback (OR = 0.26; p = 0.006), share assessments with families (OR = 0.09; p < 0.001), define a care plan (OR = 0.22; p < 0.001), assess social conditions (OR = 0.34; p = 0.009), falls (OR = 0.06; p = 0.007), sarcopenia (OR = 0.18; p = 0.002), frailty (OR = 0.27; p = 0.006), provide prognosis (OR = 0.29; p = 0.002), consider older patients' goals (OR = 0.21; p = 0.04) and plan discharge (OR = 0.23; p < 0.001). The main barriers were related to patients' health conditions and the limitations of time and resources.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Incorporating PCC and CGA practices by PTs in the hospital seems to be linked to the characteristics of PTs and their availability of time. Educational and organizational interventions to foster PCC and CGA are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 2","pages":"e70051"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiotherapists' Practices on Assessing Hospitalised Older Patients: What Are the Current Gaps?\",\"authors\":\"Elisângela Cristina Ramos Hernandes, Geovanna Maria de Moura, Adriana Lunardi, Luciana Chiavegato, Monica Rodrigues Perracini\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pri.70051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Incorporating Person-centred Care (PCC) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) practices for hospitalised patients result in positive health outcomes. We aimed to identify the frequency of incorporating PCC and CGA practices among physiotherapists (PTs) working in hospitals and its association with PTs' gender, years of experience, and duration of physiotherapy sessions and to identify the barriers to assessing older patients in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey with physiotherapists working in hospitals using a questionnaire including PTs characteristics, barriers and the frequency of incorporation of PCC and CGA practices, using a Likert scale. An ordinal regression analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Male PTs, compared to females, were less likely to consider the patient's and family's feelings (OR = 0.35; p = < 0.001), use appropriate language (OR = 0.42; p = 0.04), embrace the patient's feelings (OR = 0.28; p = < 0.001), adapts their communication (OR = 0.33; p = 0.006) and used encouragement and negotiation strategies (OR = 0.52; p = 0.02). Less experienced PTs (< 2 years) tended not to value older patients' choices (OR = 0.08; p = 0.03), share assessments with families (OR = 0.39; p < 0.001), define a care plan (OR = 0.61; p = 0.02), and embrace the patient's feelings, compared to more experienced ones. PTs conducting quick assessments (< 10 min) were less likely to provide feedback (OR = 0.26; p = 0.006), share assessments with families (OR = 0.09; p < 0.001), define a care plan (OR = 0.22; p < 0.001), assess social conditions (OR = 0.34; p = 0.009), falls (OR = 0.06; p = 0.007), sarcopenia (OR = 0.18; p = 0.002), frailty (OR = 0.27; p = 0.006), provide prognosis (OR = 0.29; p = 0.002), consider older patients' goals (OR = 0.21; p = 0.04) and plan discharge (OR = 0.23; p < 0.001). The main barriers were related to patients' health conditions and the limitations of time and resources.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Incorporating PCC and CGA practices by PTs in the hospital seems to be linked to the characteristics of PTs and their availability of time. Educational and organizational interventions to foster PCC and CGA are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"volume\":\"30 2\",\"pages\":\"e70051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Research International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physiotherapists' Practices on Assessing Hospitalised Older Patients: What Are the Current Gaps?
Background and purpose: Incorporating Person-centred Care (PCC) and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) practices for hospitalised patients result in positive health outcomes. We aimed to identify the frequency of incorporating PCC and CGA practices among physiotherapists (PTs) working in hospitals and its association with PTs' gender, years of experience, and duration of physiotherapy sessions and to identify the barriers to assessing older patients in the hospital.
Methods: Cross-sectional survey with physiotherapists working in hospitals using a questionnaire including PTs characteristics, barriers and the frequency of incorporation of PCC and CGA practices, using a Likert scale. An ordinal regression analysis was conducted.
Results: Male PTs, compared to females, were less likely to consider the patient's and family's feelings (OR = 0.35; p = < 0.001), use appropriate language (OR = 0.42; p = 0.04), embrace the patient's feelings (OR = 0.28; p = < 0.001), adapts their communication (OR = 0.33; p = 0.006) and used encouragement and negotiation strategies (OR = 0.52; p = 0.02). Less experienced PTs (< 2 years) tended not to value older patients' choices (OR = 0.08; p = 0.03), share assessments with families (OR = 0.39; p < 0.001), define a care plan (OR = 0.61; p = 0.02), and embrace the patient's feelings, compared to more experienced ones. PTs conducting quick assessments (< 10 min) were less likely to provide feedback (OR = 0.26; p = 0.006), share assessments with families (OR = 0.09; p < 0.001), define a care plan (OR = 0.22; p < 0.001), assess social conditions (OR = 0.34; p = 0.009), falls (OR = 0.06; p = 0.007), sarcopenia (OR = 0.18; p = 0.002), frailty (OR = 0.27; p = 0.006), provide prognosis (OR = 0.29; p = 0.002), consider older patients' goals (OR = 0.21; p = 0.04) and plan discharge (OR = 0.23; p < 0.001). The main barriers were related to patients' health conditions and the limitations of time and resources.
Discussion: Incorporating PCC and CGA practices by PTs in the hospital seems to be linked to the characteristics of PTs and their availability of time. Educational and organizational interventions to foster PCC and CGA are needed.
期刊介绍：
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
