晚期/转移性肾细胞癌随机对照试验的易损性指数。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yingwei Bi, Haotian Wei, Qifeng Ma, Rui Wang, Jiacheng Jin, Kexin Qu, Yuxin Liu, Ziwei Zhai, Liang Zhu, Jianbo Wang
{"title":"晚期/转移性肾细胞癌随机对照试验的易损性指数。","authors":"Yingwei Bi, Haotian Wei, Qifeng Ma, Rui Wang, Jiacheng Jin, Kexin Qu, Yuxin Liu, Ziwei Zhai, Liang Zhu, Jianbo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The fragility index (FI) has been applied as a supplement to the noncomprehensive P-values to assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The objective of this study is to evaluate the statistical robustness of RCTs of advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer (a/mRCC) using the FI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RCTs related to a/mRCC published in the 4 highest-impact general medical journals and the 25 highest-impact urological journals between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023, were identified from PubMed database. The FI was calculated by using Fisher's exact test. Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to assess potential correlates regarding FI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 eligible RCTs were screened with a median total sample size of 654.5 (IQR, 461-847) and a median patients lost to follow-up of 14 (IQR, 3-23). The median FI was 12.5 (IQR, 8.5-27), suggesting that a switch in outcomes in only 13 patients would have reversed the significance of the trials. The number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded or equaled to the FI in 7 (44%) RCTs. P-values were negatively associated with the FI, while the number of patients lost to follow-up and patients enrolled were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Not all RCTs associated with a/mRCC are as statistically robust as previously considered and should therefore be construed carefully. We suggest that additional reporting of FI in urological RCTs as a supplement to the P-value to assist readers in concluding reliably by considering the fragility of the outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yingwei Bi, Haotian Wei, Qifeng Ma, Rui Wang, Jiacheng Jin, Kexin Qu, Yuxin Liu, Ziwei Zhai, Liang Zhu, Jianbo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The fragility index (FI) has been applied as a supplement to the noncomprehensive P-values to assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The objective of this study is to evaluate the statistical robustness of RCTs of advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer (a/mRCC) using the FI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>RCTs related to a/mRCC published in the 4 highest-impact general medical journals and the 25 highest-impact urological journals between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023, were identified from PubMed database. The FI was calculated by using Fisher's exact test. Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to assess potential correlates regarding FI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16 eligible RCTs were screened with a median total sample size of 654.5 (IQR, 461-847) and a median patients lost to follow-up of 14 (IQR, 3-23). The median FI was 12.5 (IQR, 8.5-27), suggesting that a switch in outcomes in only 13 patients would have reversed the significance of the trials. The number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded or equaled to the FI in 7 (44%) RCTs. P-values were negatively associated with the FI, while the number of patients lost to follow-up and patients enrolled were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Not all RCTs associated with a/mRCC are as statistically robust as previously considered and should therefore be construed carefully. We suggest that additional reporting of FI in urological RCTs as a supplement to the P-value to assist readers in concluding reliably by considering the fragility of the outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.03.003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The fragility index of randomized controlled trials in advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer.

Purpose: The fragility index (FI) has been applied as a supplement to the noncomprehensive P-values to assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The objective of this study is to evaluate the statistical robustness of RCTs of advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer (a/mRCC) using the FI.

Materials and methods: RCTs related to a/mRCC published in the 4 highest-impact general medical journals and the 25 highest-impact urological journals between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2023, were identified from PubMed database. The FI was calculated by using Fisher's exact test. Spearman's correlation analysis was conducted to assess potential correlates regarding FI.

Results: 16 eligible RCTs were screened with a median total sample size of 654.5 (IQR, 461-847) and a median patients lost to follow-up of 14 (IQR, 3-23). The median FI was 12.5 (IQR, 8.5-27), suggesting that a switch in outcomes in only 13 patients would have reversed the significance of the trials. The number of patients lost to follow-up exceeded or equaled to the FI in 7 (44%) RCTs. P-values were negatively associated with the FI, while the number of patients lost to follow-up and patients enrolled were not statistically significant.

Conclusion: Not all RCTs associated with a/mRCC are as statistically robust as previously considered and should therefore be construed carefully. We suggest that additional reporting of FI in urological RCTs as a supplement to the P-value to assist readers in concluding reliably by considering the fragility of the outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信