剖宫产后增强恢复方案(ERAC)依从性的种族差异:2016-2020年纽约市两家医院的回顾性观察研究

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Abbey T Gilman, Jessica Kim, Silis Y Jiang, Sharon E Abramovitz, Robert S White
{"title":"剖宫产后增强恢复方案(ERAC)依从性的种族差异:2016-2020年纽约市两家医院的回顾性观察研究","authors":"Abbey T Gilman, Jessica Kim, Silis Y Jiang, Sharon E Abramovitz, Robert S White","doi":"10.1055/a-2548-0737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery programs for cesarean deliveries (ERAC) aim to optimize the quality of care for all patients. Race is not routinely monitored in ERAC programs. Given the extensive reports of racial disparities in obstetrical care, the goal of this study was to investigate racial differences in adherence rates to individual ERAC protocol elements.A cohort study was performed among cesarean delivery patients enrolled in an ERAC program at two hospitals from October 2016 to September 2020. Compliance with anesthesia-specific ERAC metrics, including ketorolac, ondansetron, and active warming methods, were compared by race. Race was self-reported by all patients. Logistic regression models stratified by pre- and post-ERAC status were used to assess relationships.The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3,172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). There were no racial differences found in overall ERAC protocol adherence, active warming methods, or ondansetron administration in the pre- and post-ERAC groups. The odds of ketorolac administration in Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.020) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.027) pre-ERAC were significantly lower compared with white patients. In the post-ERAC group, this disparity persisted in Black (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.042) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.023).Appropriate implementation and adherence to all elements of the ERAC program may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in outcomes and ensuring equitable treatment for all patients. · No racial differences were found in ondansetron administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · No racial differences were found in active warming methods pre- and post-ERAC.. · Black patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · Asian patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · ERAC metrics must be routinely monitored by race to resolve any observed inequities..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial Disparities in the Adherence to an Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Protocol (ERAC): A Retrospective Observational Study at Two NYC Hospitals, 2016-2020.\",\"authors\":\"Abbey T Gilman, Jessica Kim, Silis Y Jiang, Sharon E Abramovitz, Robert S White\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2548-0737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery programs for cesarean deliveries (ERAC) aim to optimize the quality of care for all patients. Race is not routinely monitored in ERAC programs. Given the extensive reports of racial disparities in obstetrical care, the goal of this study was to investigate racial differences in adherence rates to individual ERAC protocol elements.A cohort study was performed among cesarean delivery patients enrolled in an ERAC program at two hospitals from October 2016 to September 2020. Compliance with anesthesia-specific ERAC metrics, including ketorolac, ondansetron, and active warming methods, were compared by race. Race was self-reported by all patients. Logistic regression models stratified by pre- and post-ERAC status were used to assess relationships.The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3,172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). There were no racial differences found in overall ERAC protocol adherence, active warming methods, or ondansetron administration in the pre- and post-ERAC groups. The odds of ketorolac administration in Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.95; <i>p</i> = 0.020) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.027) pre-ERAC were significantly lower compared with white patients. In the post-ERAC group, this disparity persisted in Black (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-0.99; <i>p</i> = 0.042) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98; <i>p</i> = 0.023).Appropriate implementation and adherence to all elements of the ERAC program may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in outcomes and ensuring equitable treatment for all patients. · No racial differences were found in ondansetron administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · No racial differences were found in active warming methods pre- and post-ERAC.. · Black patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · Asian patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · ERAC metrics must be routinely monitored by race to resolve any observed inequities..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2548-0737\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2548-0737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

剖宫产术后增强恢复项目(ERAC)旨在优化所有患者的护理质量。在ERAC项目中,种族并不是常规监测。鉴于关于产科护理中种族差异的广泛报道,本研究的目的是调查种族差异在个体ERAC协议要素依从率方面的差异。2016年10月至2020年9月,在两家医院参加ERAC项目的剖宫产患者中进行了一项队列研究。对麻醉特定ERAC指标的依从性,包括酮罗拉酸、昂丹司琼和主动升温方法,按种族进行比较。所有患者均自我报告种族。采用erac前后状态分层的逻辑回归模型来评估关系。样本包括7812例剖宫产患者,其中erac前4640例(59.4%),erac后3172例(40.6%)。在ERAC前后两组中,在总体ERAC方案依从性、主动升温方法或昂丹司琼给药方面没有发现种族差异。黑人患者给予酮罗拉酸的几率(校正优势比[aOR]: 0.72;95%置信区间[CI]: 0.55-0.95;p = 0.020)和亚洲患者(aOR: 0.81;95% ci: 0.68-0.98;p = 0.027)前erac显著低于白人患者。在erac后的组中,这种差异在黑人中持续存在(aOR: 0.80;95% ci: 0.65-0.99;p = 0.042)和亚洲患者(aOR: 0.85;95% ci: 0.73-0.98;p = 0.023)。适当地实施和遵守ERAC计划的所有要素,可能为减少结果差异和确保所有患者的公平治疗提供一种实用的方法。·在erac前后,昂丹司琼给药没有发现种族差异。·主动升温方法在erac前后没有发现种族差异。·黑人患者在erac前后服用酮罗拉酸的几率明显较低。·亚洲患者在erac前后服用酮罗拉酸的几率明显较低。·ERAC指标必须按种族进行常规监控,以解决任何观察到的不公平现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Racial Disparities in the Adherence to an Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Protocol (ERAC): A Retrospective Observational Study at Two NYC Hospitals, 2016-2020.

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs for cesarean deliveries (ERAC) aim to optimize the quality of care for all patients. Race is not routinely monitored in ERAC programs. Given the extensive reports of racial disparities in obstetrical care, the goal of this study was to investigate racial differences in adherence rates to individual ERAC protocol elements.A cohort study was performed among cesarean delivery patients enrolled in an ERAC program at two hospitals from October 2016 to September 2020. Compliance with anesthesia-specific ERAC metrics, including ketorolac, ondansetron, and active warming methods, were compared by race. Race was self-reported by all patients. Logistic regression models stratified by pre- and post-ERAC status were used to assess relationships.The sample consisted of 7,812 cesarean delivery patients, of which 4,640 were pre-ERAC (59.4%) and 3,172 were post-ERAC (40.6%). There were no racial differences found in overall ERAC protocol adherence, active warming methods, or ondansetron administration in the pre- and post-ERAC groups. The odds of ketorolac administration in Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.95; p = 0.020) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.68-0.98; p = 0.027) pre-ERAC were significantly lower compared with white patients. In the post-ERAC group, this disparity persisted in Black (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.65-0.99; p = 0.042) and Asian patients (aOR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.98; p = 0.023).Appropriate implementation and adherence to all elements of the ERAC program may provide a practical approach to reducing disparities in outcomes and ensuring equitable treatment for all patients. · No racial differences were found in ondansetron administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · No racial differences were found in active warming methods pre- and post-ERAC.. · Black patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · Asian patients had significantly lower odds of ketorolac administration pre- and post-ERAC.. · ERAC metrics must be routinely monitored by race to resolve any observed inequities..

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信