罗库溴铵给药与中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者临床结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mayuko Tonai, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideaki Watanabe, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"罗库溴铵给药与中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者临床结局的关系:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Mayuko Tonai, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideaki Watanabe, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1177/10600280251329195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are commonly used to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the efficacy of continuous NMBA administration other than cisatracurium remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between continuous rocuronium administration and clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a Japanese national inpatient database (April 2018-March 2022). Adult patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), with respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥3 were included. The patients were divided into those receiving continuous rocuronium (exposure group) and those not receiving any continuous NMBAs (comparison group). The association between continuous rocuronium administration and outcomes was analyzed using multivariable regression analyses fitted with generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1992 eligible patients, 124 received rocuronium. In-hospital mortality were 30.8% and 25.8% in the comparison and exposure groups, respectively. No significant differences observed in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 1.19), ICU mortality (9.0% vs 8.9%, OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.87), median length of hospital stay (26 vs 28 days, %change 10.5; 95% CI: -8.9 to 34.1), ICU stay (8 vs 10 days, %change 9.0; 95% CI: -4.3 to 24.2), or mechanical ventilation (7 vs 10 days, %change 10.3; 95% CI: -5.3 to 28.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Continuous rocuronium administration for moderate-to-severe ARDS, specifically in patients with pneumonia, was not associated with either improved or worsened clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that rocuronium may be a feasible option as a supportive therapy for ventilator management in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, providing a basis for further research in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280251329195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Rocuronium Administration and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Mayuko Tonai, Yusuke Sasabuchi, Hideaki Watanabe, Hiroki Matsui, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280251329195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are commonly used to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the efficacy of continuous NMBA administration other than cisatracurium remains understudied.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the association between continuous rocuronium administration and clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a Japanese national inpatient database (April 2018-March 2022). Adult patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), with respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥3 were included. The patients were divided into those receiving continuous rocuronium (exposure group) and those not receiving any continuous NMBAs (comparison group). The association between continuous rocuronium administration and outcomes was analyzed using multivariable regression analyses fitted with generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1992 eligible patients, 124 received rocuronium. In-hospital mortality were 30.8% and 25.8% in the comparison and exposure groups, respectively. No significant differences observed in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 1.19), ICU mortality (9.0% vs 8.9%, OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.87), median length of hospital stay (26 vs 28 days, %change 10.5; 95% CI: -8.9 to 34.1), ICU stay (8 vs 10 days, %change 9.0; 95% CI: -4.3 to 24.2), or mechanical ventilation (7 vs 10 days, %change 10.3; 95% CI: -5.3 to 28.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Continuous rocuronium administration for moderate-to-severe ARDS, specifically in patients with pneumonia, was not associated with either improved or worsened clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that rocuronium may be a feasible option as a supportive therapy for ventilator management in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, providing a basis for further research in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280251329195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251329195\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251329195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经肌肉阻滞剂(nmba)通常用于治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)。然而,除顺阿曲库铵外,连续服用NMBA的疗效仍未得到充分研究。目的:探讨持续给予罗库溴铵与中重度ARDS患者临床结局的关系。方法:使用日本国家住院患者数据库(2018年4月至2022年3月)的数据进行回顾性队列研究。纳入重症监护病房(ICU)需要机械通气且呼吸序贯器官衰竭评分≥3分的成年肺炎患者。患者分为连续接受罗库溴铵治疗组(暴露组)和未连续接受nmba治疗组(对照组)。采用广义估计方程拟合的多变量回归分析分析持续罗库溴铵给药与预后之间的关系。结果:在1992例符合条件的患者中,124例接受了罗库溴铵治疗。对比组和暴露组的住院死亡率分别为30.8%和25.8%。住院死亡率无显著差异(优势比[OR] 0.70;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.42 ~ 1.19), ICU死亡率(9.0% vs 8.9%, OR 0.87;95% CI: 0.41 ~ 1.87),中位住院时间(26天vs 28天,%变化10.5;95% CI: -8.9 ~ 34.1), ICU住院时间(8天vs 10天,%变化9.0;95% CI: -4.3至24.2),或机械通气(7天vs 10天,%变化10.3;95% CI: -5.3 ~ 28.5)。结论及相关性:持续给予罗库溴铵治疗中重度ARDS,特别是肺炎患者,与临床结果的改善或恶化无关。这些结果提示,罗库溴铵可能是中重度ARDS患者呼吸机管理的一种可行的支持治疗选择,为进一步的临床研究提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Rocuronium Administration and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are commonly used to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, the efficacy of continuous NMBA administration other than cisatracurium remains understudied.

Objective: To examine the association between continuous rocuronium administration and clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using data from a Japanese national inpatient database (April 2018-March 2022). Adult patients with pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), with respiratory Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of ≥3 were included. The patients were divided into those receiving continuous rocuronium (exposure group) and those not receiving any continuous NMBAs (comparison group). The association between continuous rocuronium administration and outcomes was analyzed using multivariable regression analyses fitted with generalized estimating equations.

Results: Among 1992 eligible patients, 124 received rocuronium. In-hospital mortality were 30.8% and 25.8% in the comparison and exposure groups, respectively. No significant differences observed in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42 to 1.19), ICU mortality (9.0% vs 8.9%, OR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.41 to 1.87), median length of hospital stay (26 vs 28 days, %change 10.5; 95% CI: -8.9 to 34.1), ICU stay (8 vs 10 days, %change 9.0; 95% CI: -4.3 to 24.2), or mechanical ventilation (7 vs 10 days, %change 10.3; 95% CI: -5.3 to 28.5).

Conclusion and relevance: Continuous rocuronium administration for moderate-to-severe ARDS, specifically in patients with pneumonia, was not associated with either improved or worsened clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that rocuronium may be a feasible option as a supportive therapy for ventilator management in patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, providing a basis for further research in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信